vinmunoz Cream of the Crop  More info Post edited over 5 years ago by vinmunoz. | Jun 21, 2018 23:44 | #17761 Meanwhile.. another of Rachelle. 
 Image hosted by forum (919264) © vinmunoz [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. | SONY A7SIII(2) | A73 | A6000 | Sony A7IV | Sigma105 | FE1635F4 | Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 | Tamron 17-28 Tamron 28-75 | FE50F1.8 | Sony 16035F4PZ | SEL30mm F3.5 Macro | Canon 24mm TSE | Laowa 15mm Shift
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!"  More info Post edited over 5 years ago by KenjiS. | Jun 22, 2018 01:29 | #17762 Ive always wanted one of these.. lol   Dahlia 1 by Trevor H, on Flickr Dahlia 2 by Trevor H, on Flickr Raindrops on Dahlia by Trevor H, on Flickr Pink Growing by Trevor H, on Flickr Yellow Flower by Trevor H, on Flickr Cosmos by Trevor H, on Flickr Wet Luna on Sofa by Trevor H, on FlickrMan it feels like im relearning photography with it though... I was getting the A7III's quirks down by the end of the day though. Definitely love how a bunch of the images came out... Still have another dozen or so to go through and process... I was teaching myself the focus modes and just having to learn roughly where i need to be when it comes to capturing my dogs.. Autofocus is fantastic and really my hit rate was on par with my 7D II which is a pretty high bar. Sadly todays light was kinda hit or miss, worked well for the flowers, less so for the dogs... Tomorrow will be better hopefully Love the look on the 90mm f/2.8 Macro too.. The 55 is great too but i did not get the best light when i was shooting it so i didnt get to show off how gorgeous the images look with it The sensor is spectacular, For only having another 4 megapixels the images have so much more crispness and sharpness to them.. Its almost unreal... Plus the difference in isolation ability is huge.. that little Sonnar is reminding me what it was like shooting film Downside? Eye and face detect AF do not seem to work well with the corgis, but it still seems to get the AF in about the right spot most of the time. The RAW files take up almost twice the space of my 7DII and the viewfinder tends to make objects look brighter than they actually are. Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidArbogast Cream of the Crop  More info | Jun 22, 2018 02:08 | #17763 KenjiS wrote in post #18649297 Ive always wanted one of these.. lol ANYWAYS! Guess who got his A7III today  First 7 photos from it Dahlia 1 by Trevor H, on Flickr Dahlia 2 by Trevor H, on Flickr Raindrops on Dahlia by Trevor H, on Flickr Pink Growing by Trevor H, on Flickrhttps://flic.kr/p/27kCPgu Yellow Flower by Trevor H, on Flickrhttps://flic.kr/p/27kCPdJ Cosmos by Trevor H, on Flickrhttps://flic.kr/p/27kCPhw Wet Luna on Sofa by Trevor H, on FlickrMan it feels like im relearning photography with it though... I was getting the A7III's quirks down by the end of the day though. Definitely love how a bunch of the images came out... Still have another dozen or so to go through and process... I was teaching myself the focus modes and just having to learn roughly where i need to be when it comes to capturing my dogs.. Autofocus is fantastic and really my hit rate was on par with my 7D II which is a pretty high bar. Sadly todays light was kinda hit or miss, worked well for the flowers, less so for the dogs... Tomorrow will be better hopefully Love the look on the 90mm f/2.8 Macro too.. The 55 is great too but i did not get the best light when i was shooting it so i didnt get to show off how gorgeous the images look with it The sensor is spectacular, For only having another 4 megapixels the images have so much more crispness and sharpness to them.. Its almost unreal... Plus the difference in isolation ability is huge.. that little Sonnar is reminding me what it was like shooting film Downside? Eye and face detect AF do not seem to work well with the corgis, but it still seems to get the AF in about the right spot most of the time. The RAW files take up almost twice the space of my 7DII and the viewfinder tends to make objects look brighter than they actually are. Congrats on the new camera! Great first shots. Eye AF doesn’t work on Yorkies either, a bummer for me. David | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
navydoc Cream of the Crop  More info | Jun 22, 2018 06:29 | #17764 Congrats Trevor. Gene - My Photo Gallery ||
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MedicineMan4040 The Magic Johnson of Cameras  More info | Jun 22, 2018 06:35 | #17765 KenjiS wrote in post #18649297 Ive always wanted one of these.. lol ANYWAYS! Guess who got his A7III today First 7 photos from it Dahlia 1 by Trevor H, on Flickr Dahlia 2 by Trevor H, on Flickr Raindrops on Dahlia by Trevor H, on Flickr Pink Growing by Trevor H, on Flickrhttps://flic.kr/p/27kCPgu Yellow Flower by Trevor H, on Flickrhttps://flic.kr/p/27kCPdJ Cosmos by Trevor H, on Flickrhttps://flic.kr/p/27kCPhw Wet Luna on Sofa by Trevor H, on FlickrMan it feels like im relearning photography with it though... I was getting the A7III's quirks down by the end of the day though. Definitely love how a bunch of the images came out... Still have another dozen or so to go through and process... I was teaching myself the focus modes and just having to learn roughly where i need to be when it comes to capturing my dogs.. Autofocus is fantastic and really my hit rate was on par with my 7D II which is a pretty high bar. Sadly todays light was kinda hit or miss, worked well for the flowers, less so for the dogs... Tomorrow will be better hopefully Love the look on the 90mm f/2.8 Macro too.. The 55 is great too but i did not get the best light when i was shooting it so i didnt get to show off how gorgeous the images look with it The sensor is spectacular, For only having another 4 megapixels the images have so much more crispness and sharpness to them.. Its almost unreal... Plus the difference in isolation ability is huge.. that little Sonnar is reminding me what it was like shooting film Downside? Eye and face detect AF do not seem to work well with the corgis, but it still seems to get the AF in about the right spot most of the time. The RAW files take up almost twice the space of my 7DII and the viewfinder tends to make objects look brighter than they actually are. Woot on your new machine! Love your hound. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MedicineMan4040 The Magic Johnson of Cameras More info | Jun 22, 2018 06:36 | #17766 navydoc wrote in post #18649360 Congrats Trevor. Maybe there will be a future firmware update for PET auto eye AF.  I'd take intervalometer in an update slightly over eye AF. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vinmunoz Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 22, 2018 07:13 | #17767 Yah. me too. intervalometer and SR app that's all we need. | SONY A7SIII(2) | A73 | A6000 | Sony A7IV | Sigma105 | FE1635F4 | Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 | Tamron 17-28 Tamron 28-75 | FE50F1.8 | Sony 16035F4PZ | SEL30mm F3.5 Macro | Canon 24mm TSE | Laowa 15mm Shift
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 22, 2018 08:52 | #17768 David Arbogast wrote in post #18648455 Well, after nearly a month of foot-dragging, I finally got my FE 35mm 1.4 ZA up for sale on FM . Needing the funds to offset some unforseen medical costs. Since I'm mainly a landscape guy (at this point) I don't need the lens as my Loxia 35mm is my preferred landscape/cityscape lens at that focal length. Regardless, selling this wonderful lens is painful. Honestly though, my next lens - when/if I get an opportunity to buy one - will likely be a practical zoom, like perhaps a FE 24-105mm. I don't prefer zooms, but they absolutely have their place and general-purpose one would certainly be useful to me. David, I hope your medical situation isn't serious. Sad to see you sell your FE 35 f1.4 lens. I too would love to have another zoom lens for travel. I have been impressed with the images I've seen from the FE 24-105mm. I am also interested in the FE 100-400 as a landscape/occasional wildlife lens. - Alfredo -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 22, 2018 08:56 | #17769 TRhoads wrote in post #18649205 I have been on the annual family vacation at the beach...the weather has not cooperated much for sunrise and sunset or Milky Way this year...but I kept the a9 out tonight, I had been shooting shore birds...some nice color and reflections...I have not used the a9 much for landscape work, it holds up well... 
 Hosted photo: posted by TRhoads in ./showthread.php?p=18649205&i=i16768424 forum: Sony Digital Cameras Another beautiful shot Travis. Love that cloud. - Alfredo -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 22, 2018 08:58 | #17770 David Arbogast wrote in post #18649262 16-35mm would be great for RE. Alfredo’s doing amazing work with his 16-35mm GM. makes me want one.  Thanks David! I am so happy I purchased one. So versatile and a sold performer across the board. - Alfredo -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TRhoads Cream of the Crop  More info | Jun 22, 2018 09:44 | #17771 digital_AM wrote in post #18649403 David, I hope your medical situation isn't serious. Sad to see you sell your FE 35 f1.4 lens. I too would love to have another zoom lens for travel. I have been impressed with the images I've seen from the FE 24-105mm. I am also interested in the FE 100-400 as a landscape/occasional wildlife lens. I need to win the lotto to satisfy all of my lens wants...17/24 TSE are probably high on the list...FE35ZA...100-400...the list goes on... digital_AM wrote in post #18649405 Another beautiful shot Travis. Love that cloud. Thanks. Gotta love big clouds like that. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ccp900 Goldmember 1,569 posts Likes: 144 Joined Jun 2006 More info | Jun 22, 2018 10:46 | #17772 vinmunoz wrote in post #18649248 I'm getting more and more RE work. i've done 2 this week and one more on monday and another one on tuesday. I'm contemplating trading or selling my FE35F1.4 for the 16-35F4. I don't use the F1.4 too often since i'm shooting portrait outdoor. A lot of space to backup usually. hard to let go though. it's really amazing at F1.4 when you use it. i dont follow RE but wouldnt you get a lot of distortion with that lens? wouldnt it be better to stitch if you cant get the whole room into 1 frame? maybe with those fancy heads that remove parallax issues? [Sony A7R Mark 3 | Sony A7S | Sony Zeiss 16-35m f/4.0 | Sony FE 85m f1.8 | Sony FE 20m f1.8 G | Samyang 18m f2.8 | Samyang 45m f1.8 | Zeiss Batis 40m f2 | Sony FE 28m f2 | Sony Zeiss 55m f1.8 | Sony FE 28-70m f/3.5-5.6 | Helios 44-2 | Helios 44-3 | Nikon 105m f/2.5 AIS | Contax Zeiss Planar 50m f1.7 | Contax Zeiss Planar 100m f2 | Voigtlander Nokton 40m f/1.4 | Canon 24-105m f/4.0L | Canon 85m f/1.8 | Sigma 30m f/1.4 | Canon 10-22m f/3.5-4.5 | Canon 100m f/2.8 Macro USM | Canon 580 EX Ver 1.0]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ccp900 Goldmember 1,569 posts Likes: 144 Joined Jun 2006 More info Post edited over 5 years ago by ccp900. | Jun 22, 2018 10:48 | #17773 vinmunoz wrote in post #18649275 Meanwhile.. another of Rachelle. 
Hosted photo: posted by vinmunoz in ./showthread.php?p=18649275&i=i253542611 forum: Sony Digital Cameras 
Hosted photo: posted by vinmunoz in ./showthread.php?p=18649275&i=i165782357 forum: Sony Digital Cameras hi vinz, did you add digital noise in the 2nd photo? [Sony A7R Mark 3 | Sony A7S | Sony Zeiss 16-35m f/4.0 | Sony FE 85m f1.8 | Sony FE 20m f1.8 G | Samyang 18m f2.8 | Samyang 45m f1.8 | Zeiss Batis 40m f2 | Sony FE 28m f2 | Sony Zeiss 55m f1.8 | Sony FE 28-70m f/3.5-5.6 | Helios 44-2 | Helios 44-3 | Nikon 105m f/2.5 AIS | Contax Zeiss Planar 50m f1.7 | Contax Zeiss Planar 100m f2 | Voigtlander Nokton 40m f/1.4 | Canon 24-105m f/4.0L | Canon 85m f/1.8 | Sigma 30m f/1.4 | Canon 10-22m f/3.5-4.5 | Canon 100m f/2.8 Macro USM | Canon 580 EX Ver 1.0]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vinmunoz Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 22, 2018 11:38 | #17774 ccp900 wrote in post #18649442 hi vinz, did you add digital noise in the 2nd photo? yes i did. | SONY A7SIII(2) | A73 | A6000 | Sony A7IV | Sigma105 | FE1635F4 | Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 | Tamron 17-28 Tamron 28-75 | FE50F1.8 | Sony 16035F4PZ | SEL30mm F3.5 Macro | Canon 24mm TSE | Laowa 15mm Shift
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vinmunoz Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 22, 2018 11:41 | #17775 ccp900 wrote in post #18649440 i dont follow RE but wouldnt you get a lot of distortion with that lens? wouldnt it be better to stitch if you cant get the whole room into 1 frame? maybe with those fancy heads that remove parallax issues? that's why i'm planning to trade my 35F1.4 for the 16-35F4 and shoot around 20mm. | SONY A7SIII(2) | A73 | A6000 | Sony A7IV | Sigma105 | FE1635F4 | Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 | Tamron 17-28 Tamron 28-75 | FE50F1.8 | Sony 16035F4PZ | SEL30mm F3.5 Macro | Canon 24mm TSE | Laowa 15mm Shift
LOG IN TO REPLY |
| x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1555 guests, 158 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
