Your Best Flower Shots

Zeiss Makro Planar 100

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/k2w6​R6 DSC01510 by Jose Raposo, on Flickr

Sony A7R2
Canon/Sony Glass: Canon 200 F2, Sigma 135 1.8,12-24 G, 16-35 GM, 24-70 GM, 90 GM
Zeiss Glass: 55 OTUS, 100 Makro Planar, Contax 100-300
Legacy and M Mount Glass: Leica 90 APO, Zeiss 35 1.4 Distagon, Zeiss 50 1.5 C, Zeiss Biogon 25 ZM, Zeiss 85 Tele-Tessar, Canon 50 F0.95, Meyer-Optik Trioplan 100 F2.8, Zeiss Biotar 58.

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi / EOS 400D / Kiss Digital X • Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM @185mm • 1/125 • f/2.8 • ISO 400

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

>myGEAR<
Edit My Images- OK"Brain Fart" = an essential bodily function.

-Douglas- wrote in post #18708138

Hosted photo: posted by -Douglas- in
./showthread.php?p=187​08138&i=i236920707
forum: Nature & Landscapes

That's a beautiful shot Douglas.

LD, or Mike
Often mistaken, but never in doubt.

>myGEAR<
Edit My Images- OK"Brain Fart" = an essential bodily function.

Olympus E-M10 • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/4.0-5.6 R @150mm • 1/160 • f/7.1 • ISO 400

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/EypK​DZ Succulent flower Olympus Zuicko 40-150 test (4) by Kevin Dickinson, on Flickr

See my fishy photography here: https://kevindickinson​fineartphot.smugmug.co​m/Tropical-Fish-2/
Olympus PenF | Olympus OM-D E-M5 mkll x 2 gripped | Olympus OM-D E-M10 mkll gripped | Olympus 12-40 2.8 pro | 14 -150 | 17mm 1.8 | 9mm BCL | Panasonic 12-32 | 25mm 1.7 | Panasonic Leica 8-18 | Panasonic Leica 100-400 | Godox TT685O speedlite

bidkev wrote in post #18708682

Very nice.
I see it says 40-150 test. Are you trialling it? What's your thoughts? I looked at them online yesterday.
Don't want to but into this thread. I'll come back to this later in either another thread or PM

Richard

Sibil wrote in post #18708694

That is gorgeous. Colours and detail.
Very pleasing to the eye

Richard

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV • Sigma 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM | Contemporary @600mm • 1/4000 • f/6.3 • ISO 5000

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/28mt​Y4Q IMG_9048 by dabronxbomber, on Flickr

Canon 5D Mark IV | Tamron 24-70mm G2 | Tamron 70-200mm G2 | 85mm 1.8 | 50mm STM | 35mm f/2 IS | Powershot G9 X | iPhone 7
flickr

avondale87 wrote in post #18708697
Very nice.
I see it says 40-150 test. Are you trialling it? What's your thoughts? I looked at them online yesterday.
Don't want to but into this thread. I'll come back to this later in either another thread or PM

I'd say it was the best Value for money lens from Olly but sold it to go towards the 14-150 as a walkaround. Should have kept it tbh considering what I got for it.. Get it here with a further 20% off cheap as chips: https://www.ebay.com.a​u …andardDelivery!​4017!AU!-1

See my fishy photography here: https://kevindickinson​fineartphot.smugmug.co​m/Tropical-Fish-2/
Olympus PenF | Olympus OM-D E-M5 mkll x 2 gripped | Olympus OM-D E-M10 mkll gripped | Olympus 12-40 2.8 pro | 14 -150 | 17mm 1.8 | 9mm BCL | Panasonic 12-32 | 25mm 1.7 | Panasonic Leica 8-18 | Panasonic Leica 100-400 | Godox TT685O speedlite

bidkev wrote in post #18708956
I'd say it was the best Value for money lens from Olly but sold it to go towards the 14-150 as a walkaround. Should have kept it tbh considering what I got for it.. Get it here with a further 20% off cheap as chips: https://www.ebay.com.a​u …andardDelivery!​4017!AU!-1

Ah thanks. My mistake. I was thinking the 40-150mm Pro. That's not the lens featured in that photo.
There's some sale reduced prices of the 40-150 pro with 1.4 Tc, but I'm in 2 minds.
My 70-300 mm is okay, as in okay. Nothing mind blowing

Richard

avondale87 wrote in post #18708958
Ah thanks. My mistake. I was thinking the 40-150mm Pro. That's not the lens featured in that photo.
There's some sale reduced prices of the 40-150 pro with 1.4 Tc, but I'm in 2 minds.
My 70-300 mm is okay, as in okay. Nothing mind blowing

TBH and IMHO, I don't think many pro lenses have anything going for them, other than speed and difference from non pro is minimal when it comes to IQ, but perhaps I'm just seeing some good budget lens images and some bad pro lens images? Of course, owners of pro lenses will need to defend their purchases but I'm prepared to take the flak

The Olly 45 1.8 and the 60mm macro are outstanding IMHO and the Panny 12-32 is no slouch either

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/LG4d​RS Cyclamen (1) by Kevin Dickinson, on Flickr

Olympus PEN-F • fixed lens @32mm • 1/125 • f/6.3 • ISO 400

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/26P4​eCz Wild Flower (2) by Kevin Dickinson, on Flickr

See my fishy photography here: https://kevindickinson​fineartphot.smugmug.co​m/Tropical-Fish-2/
Olympus PenF | Olympus OM-D E-M5 mkll x 2 gripped | Olympus OM-D E-M10 mkll gripped | Olympus 12-40 2.8 pro | 14 -150 | 17mm 1.8 | 9mm BCL | Panasonic 12-32 | 25mm 1.7 | Panasonic Leica 8-18 | Panasonic Leica 100-400 | Godox TT685O speedlite

Richard

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2b8F​pex The Trinity by Jose Raposo, on Flickr

Sony A7R2
Canon/Sony Glass: Canon 200 F2, Sigma 135 1.8,12-24 G, 16-35 GM, 24-70 GM, 90 GM
Zeiss Glass: 55 OTUS, 100 Makro Planar, Contax 100-300
Legacy and M Mount Glass: Leica 90 APO, Zeiss 35 1.4 Distagon, Zeiss 50 1.5 C, Zeiss Biogon 25 ZM, Zeiss 85 Tele-Tessar, Canon 50 F0.95, Meyer-Optik Trioplan 100 F2.8, Zeiss Biotar 58.