Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 31 Aug 2018 (Friday) 06:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Printer suggestions

 
AS_Photo
Member
139 posts
Likes: 59
Joined Sep 2018
     
Sep 19, 2018 09:45 |  #16

davesrose wrote in post #18711182 (external link)
Not really sure what you mean: the max is 13x19. I've made plenty of prints where I've cropped the ratio to that (and I can make custom mats).

I'm speaking about standard sized photos. I'm not going to crop my photos to fit a format that the photo was never intended to be displayed at.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
davesrose
Title Fairy still hasn't visited me!
3,614 posts
Likes: 489
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Sep 19, 2018 09:53 |  #17

AS_Photo wrote in post #18711183 (external link)
I'm speaking about standard sized photos. I'm not going to crop my photos to fit a format that the photo was never intended to be displayed at.

There really isn't one "standard" size. Being involved with several disciplines in art, I'm used to recomposing my photos for different print aspects and screen aspects.


Canon 5D mk IV
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AS_Photo
Member
139 posts
Likes: 59
Joined Sep 2018
     
Sep 19, 2018 10:05 |  #18

davesrose wrote in post #18711192 (external link)
There really isn't one "standard" size. Being involved with several disciplines in art, I'm used to recomposing my photos for different print aspects and screen aspects.

36x7 wouldn't be standard. 2x192 wouldn't be either. Yes there are standard print sizes, which typically align to what you are shooting. They are commonly offered as prints by most major print shops. They are commonly available in pre-cut matboard. Sure you can do whatever custom size you want - but that doesn't mean that there isn't magically no standard sizes.

If I'm shooting people, I'll allow for the shot to work as either 8x10 or 8x12. But I don't really do portrait work anymore except for my kids. I do landscape pretty much exclusively. My camera takes photos in 3:2 aspect ratio and I compose them as such. So I'm not going to take one of those and print it as a 16x20 as it will lose part of the shot. It needs to be 16x24 unless I specifically took the shot to allow for 16x20 which I don't really do. But I don't take multiple compositions of the same shot for the most part. I shoot it how I want it to be, and at that point it will be printed at that size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davesrose
Title Fairy still hasn't visited me!
3,614 posts
Likes: 489
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Post edited 5 months ago by davesrose.
     
Sep 19, 2018 10:12 as a reply to  @ AS_Photo's post |  #19

Well I'm doing headshots at work. I do try to compose most images at a 8x10 ratio, but then I need to make a separate 7x4.25 for a particular application. You'll also have clients that want photos from 4:3 to 16:19, to other ratios for screen applications (web banners can get really long). No, I've never seen one standard ratio.


Canon 5D mk IV
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,954 posts
Gallery: 542 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1596
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Sep 19, 2018 17:55 |  #20

davesrose wrote in post #18711192 (external link)
There really isn't one "standard" size. Being involved with several disciplines in art, I'm used to recomposing my photos for different print aspects and screen aspects.


AS_Photo wrote in post #18711201 (external link)
36x7 wouldn't be standard. 2x192 wouldn't be either. Yes there are standard print sizes, which typically align to what you are shooting. They are commonly offered as prints by most major print shops. They are commonly available in pre-cut matboard. Sure you can do whatever custom size you want - but that doesn't mean that there isn't magically no standard sizes.

If I'm shooting people, I'll allow for the shot to work as either 8x10 or 8x12. But I don't really do portrait work anymore except for my kids. I do landscape pretty much exclusively. My camera takes photos in 3:2 aspect ratio and I compose them as such. So I'm not going to take one of those and print it as a 16x20 as it will lose part of the shot. It needs to be 16x24 unless I specifically took the shot to allow for 16x20 which I don't really do. But I don't take multiple compositions of the same shot for the most part. I shoot it how I want it to be, and at that point it will be printed at that size.


davesrose wrote in post #18711204 (external link)
Well I'm doing headshots at work. I do try to compose most images at a 8x10 ratio, but then I need to make a separate 7x4.25 for a particular application. You'll also have clients that want photos from 4:3 to 16:19, to other ratios for screen applications (web banners can get really long). No, I've never seen one standard ratio.


Here's the thing, if you are only producing work for your own pleasure, then you have nothing but yourself stopping you from only printing in 3:2, or the camera's native, aspect ratio. When you have to produce images for others, then you have to be prepared to produce your images in multiple aspect ratios, based on the users needs. Personally the lab I use has it's best pricing on images up to 12" wide. A3, 12×16, and 12×18 are all pretty damn close in price. I chose to make my prints in 12×16, since the 4:3 ratio at that size offers the best deals for really cheap frames. For those sized prints I can get a glazed 16×20 frame with mount for under £10, and I like the look of the even 2" mat best too. It is though annoying that here in the UK you cannot get a poly pocket to hold a 12" wide print. Although A3 is a larger area than 12×16, the more rectangular 1:Sqrt(2) ratio is enough narrower that the available A3 items are too small. Needing an A2 sized album for 12×16 is a bit of a PITA.

Alan


My Flickr (external link)
My new Aviation images blog site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AS_Photo
Member
139 posts
Likes: 59
Joined Sep 2018
     
Sep 20, 2018 10:28 |  #21

BigAl007 wrote in post #18711500 (external link)
Here's the thing, if you are only producing work for your own pleasure, then you have nothing but yourself stopping you from only printing in 3:2, or the camera's native, aspect ratio. When you have to produce images for others, then you have to be prepared to produce your images in multiple aspect ratios, based on the users needs. Personally the lab I use has it's best pricing on images up to 12" wide. A3, 12×16, and 12×18 are all pretty damn close in price. I chose to make my prints in 12×16, since the 4:3 ratio at that size offers the best deals for really cheap frames. For those sized prints I can get a glazed 16×20 frame with mount for under £10, and I like the look of the even 2" mat best too. It is though annoying that here in the UK you cannot get a poly pocket to hold a 12" wide print. Although A3 is a larger area than 12×16, the more rectangular 1:Sqrt(2) ratio is enough narrower that the available A3 items are too small. Needing an A2 sized album for 12×16 is a bit of a PITA.

Alan

I produce images for others to purchase. I don't really do commissioned work. So either someone purchases what I make or they don't, I'm not cropping my images to a different aspect ratio just because it might be cheaper to print.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,416 views & 1 like for this thread
Printer suggestions
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is juansalva
926 guests, 386 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.