I remember seeing this great compariosion of 3 Canon, 3 Sigma and 2 Tamron macro lenses but cannot find it. Anyway I ordered me a 90mm Tamron macro cause I remember it gettnig rather good review compared to price...
PekkaM Member 203 posts Joined Jul 2001 Location: Helsinki, Finland More info | Apr 16, 2004 08:06 | #1 I remember seeing this great compariosion of 3 Canon, 3 Sigma and 2 Tamron macro lenses but cannot find it. Anyway I ordered me a 90mm Tamron macro cause I remember it gettnig rather good review compared to price...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RichieHatch Member 36 posts Joined Apr 2004 Location: Ireland More info | Apr 16, 2004 08:52 | #2 Hi PekkaM Irish Nut.....! (with a camera)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 16, 2004 08:54 | #3 That's it. Thanks!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
richard_a Member 55 posts Joined Jan 2004 Location: Canada More info | Apr 16, 2004 12:35 | #4 I would not put too much stock into this review as the Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro lens I have is much much sharper then the results shown in the review. EOS 5D, EOS 20D w/ BG-E2 Grip
LOG IN TO REPLY |
samdring Senior Member 392 posts Joined Aug 2003 Location: Crooked Spire, Derbyshire More info | Apr 16, 2004 13:58 | #5 RichieHatch wrote: Hi PekkaM Is this the link you where looking for: http://www.orchideen-kartierung.de/Macro100E.html The Tamron does indeed do well. I am not sure how accurate the test is tough as i own the Sigma 105mm and think it is sharp throughout its range... in fact every time i use this lens i am astonished by its sharpness. Good luck with the Tamron. Its supposed to be great also Richie Extremely impressed that you picked up a german link on your first post but wonder what an Isirh Nut is? Have a Care
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 19, 2004 06:11 | #6 One thing that came up: Does the 1.6-factor also affect macro photography somehow? Like do I get with 1:1 macro a 21,875mm object to fill frame (35mm/1.6)?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
karusel Goldmember 1,452 posts Joined Nov 2003 Location: Location: Location: More info | Apr 19, 2004 07:20 | #7 You get 1:1.6 5D and holy trinity of primes. Now the 90mm TS-E TS-E fly bit me. I hate these forums.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 19, 2004 07:29 | #8 karusel wrote: You get 1:1.6 I wonder, does anyone have MP-E65? I'm trying to convince myself I don't need that luxury, but I think eventually I'll fail and buy it. ![]() I thought of it for a while but soon realised I probably couldn't focus it on anything
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RichieHatch Member 36 posts Joined Apr 2004 Location: Ireland More info | Apr 19, 2004 07:47 | #9 Sorry Samdring, thats supposed to read Irish Nut. Thats a breed of nut that grows on a small island just to the west of the UK. Irish Nut.....! (with a camera)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
karusel Goldmember 1,452 posts Joined Nov 2003 Location: Location: Location: More info | Apr 19, 2004 07:48 | #10 Some people do it. 5D and holy trinity of primes. Now the 90mm TS-E TS-E fly bit me. I hate these forums.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1236 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||