Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 16 Apr 2004 (Friday) 08:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Link to macro lens roundup?

 
PekkaM
Member
Avatar
203 posts
Joined Jul 2001
Location: Helsinki, Finland
     
Apr 16, 2004 08:06 |  #1

I remember seeing this great compariosion of 3 Canon, 3 Sigma and 2 Tamron macro lenses but cannot find it. Anyway I ordered me a 90mm Tamron macro cause I remember it gettnig rather good review compared to price...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichieHatch
Member
36 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Ireland
     
Apr 16, 2004 08:52 |  #2

Hi PekkaM

Is this the link you where looking for:

http://www.orchideen-kartierung.de/Macro100​E.html (external link)

The Tamron does indeed do well. I am not sure how accurate the test is tough as i own the Sigma 105mm and think it is sharp throughout its range... in fact every time i use this lens i am astonished by its sharpness.

Good luck with the Tamron. Its supposed to be great also

Richie


Irish Nut.....! (with a camera)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PekkaM
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
203 posts
Joined Jul 2001
Location: Helsinki, Finland
     
Apr 16, 2004 08:54 |  #3

That's it. Thanks! :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
richard_a
Member
55 posts
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Canada
     
Apr 16, 2004 12:35 |  #4

I would not put too much stock into this review as the Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro lens I have is much much sharper then the results shown in the review.


EOS 5D, EOS 20D w/ BG-E2 Grip
Tamron AF28-75 f/2.8 XR DI | Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM
Sigma 50-500mm f/4-6.3 EX DG/HSM | Tokina 12-24mm f/4 AT-X AF Pro DX
Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX Macro | Canon 50 f/1.8 | Canon 85MM f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
samdring
Senior Member
Avatar
392 posts
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Crooked Spire, Derbyshire
     
Apr 16, 2004 13:58 |  #5

RichieHatch wrote:
Hi PekkaM

Is this the link you where looking for:

http://www.orchideen-kartierung.de/Macro100​E.html (external link)

The Tamron does indeed do well. I am not sure how accurate the test is tough as i own the Sigma 105mm and think it is sharp throughout its range... in fact every time i use this lens i am astonished by its sharpness.

Good luck with the Tamron. Its supposed to be great also

Richie

Extremely impressed that you picked up a german link on your first post but wonder what an Isirh Nut is?


Have a Care
Sam

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PekkaM
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
203 posts
Joined Jul 2001
Location: Helsinki, Finland
     
Apr 19, 2004 06:11 |  #6

One thing that came up: Does the 1.6-factor also affect macro photography somehow? Like do I get with 1:1 macro a 21,875mm object to fill frame (35mm/1.6)?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
karusel
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Location: Location:
     
Apr 19, 2004 07:20 |  #7

You get 1:1.6

I wonder, does anyone have MP-E65? I'm trying to convince myself I don't need that luxury, but I think eventually I'll fail and buy it. :D


5D and holy trinity of primes. Now the 90mm TS-E TS-E fly bit me. I hate these forums.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PekkaM
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
203 posts
Joined Jul 2001
Location: Helsinki, Finland
     
Apr 19, 2004 07:29 |  #8

karusel wrote:
You get 1:1.6

I wonder, does anyone have MP-E65? I'm trying to convince myself I don't need that luxury, but I think eventually I'll fail and buy it. :D

I thought of it for a while but soon realised I probably couldn't focus it on anything ;)

How does one achive those shots of flying bees etc. with few millimeters of depth of field anyway? Prefocus and lots of exposures?

I'm not gonna buy a dedicated flash for macro photography ever (yeah, right! :roll:) so I was wondering would my 550EX be any use with that Tamron lens if I used something like omnibounce on it?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichieHatch
Member
36 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Ireland
     
Apr 19, 2004 07:47 |  #9

Sorry Samdring, thats supposed to read Irish Nut. Thats a breed of nut that grows on a small island just to the west of the UK. :wink:

As for the German macro post..... I have been browsing and absorbing (this forum and a few others) for the last year or so. I had bookmarked it a while back when doing research on Macro lens. As it happens I didnt take the advice it gave on the Sigma 105mmf2.8 but instead borrowed a friends version and tested it and loved it.....!

PekkaM - I read an article (that i will try to dig up) on how one macro enthusiast photographs flying wasps etc.... he had a serious setup with big studio flashs etc... etc... If i can find it i will link it for you but maybe you can do it with cheaper equipment... not sure...!

Richie


Irish Nut.....! (with a camera)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
karusel
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Location: Location:
     
Apr 19, 2004 07:48 |  #10

Some people do it.

But my thought flow went the other way; the majority of SLR and compact users shoots in focal range of 17-300, few go above, fewer below, some buy a macro lens, but perhaps 1 in 10.000 would be crazy enough to get a MP-E 65 WITH Macro twin lite flash unit. However, the crazy one benefits from being able to take 'impossible shots'. MP-E is tack sharp at all apertures at all magnifications, well due to DOF issue it would always have to be the smallest aperture, but that is absolutely not a problem when using the twins which by the way offer some effects.


5D and holy trinity of primes. Now the 90mm TS-E TS-E fly bit me. I hate these forums.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,018 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Link to macro lens roundup?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1236 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.