STICKY:  Gear database corrections

No rush...it would be nice to see a Canon FD 35mm f2.8 and Canon AV-1 be added.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

xpfloyd wrote in post #18745055
jeez. You do realise that the list is updated by one person right? The same person that wrote the code for the whole site from scratch and let’s you use it for free?

it's now December. Do you realize this site will curl up and die without new and/or relevant content?

I've stopped posting images from this lens since I can't add them to my gear list.

I wouldn't know about that "same person who wrote the code for the whole site from scratch" because the site has no contact details for any such person. All you can do is report a thread (presumably for inappropriate content)... which I've actually done. I literally reported myself. And I got a message saying a moderator would deal with the issue. That was months ago.

nero_design wrote in post #18762682
it's now December. Do you realize this site will curl up and die without new and/or relevant content?

I've stopped posting images from this lens since I can't add them to my gear list.

I wouldn't know about that "same person who wrote the code for the whole site from scratch" because the site has no contact details for any such person. All you can do is report a thread (presumably for inappropriate content)... which I've actually done. I literally reported myself. And I got a message saying a moderator would deal with the issue. That was months ago.

its right at the bottom of every page I.e Pekka. Show some appreciation instead of posting rude messages about how slow some things are implemented. 126 posts in 6 years isn’t exactly full engagement either so maybe that’s why moderators are not jumping at the chance to prioritise helping you out.

nero_design wrote in post #18762682
it's now December. Do you realize this site will curl up and die without new and/or relevant content?

I've stopped posting images from this lens since I can't add them to my gear list.

I wouldn't know about that "same person who wrote the code for the whole site from scratch" because the site has no contact details for any such person. All you can do is report a thread (presumably for inappropriate content)... which I've actually done. I literally reported myself. And I got a message saying a moderator would deal with the issue. That was months ago.

Sorry about that.
I'll spend this Sunday evening to put the missing cameras and lenses to the list.

While we're at it...

I know that this could get in to the weeds a bit, but in looking for my Zeiss Distagon 35/1.4 (in ZF.2 mount), only the 35/1.4 in ZM mount is listed. They are quite different lenses, as the ZM is much smaller and designed for a rangefinder.

What would be a good way to address the variety of mounts out there with a manufacturer like Zeiss? Get rid of mount specifications altogether or somehow group them? For instance, the ZF/ZF2/ZE variations are all optically equivalent, as far as I know.

Pekka wrote in post #18762706
Sorry about that.
I'll spend this Sunday evening to put the missing cameras and lenses to the list.

Thank you for all you do.

WhyFi wrote in post #18762796
While we're at it...

I know that this could get in to the weeds a bit, but in looking for my Zeiss Distagon 35/1.4 (in ZF.2 mount), only the 35/1.4 in ZM mount is listed. They are quite different lenses, as the ZM is much smaller and designed for a rangefinder.

What would be a good way to address the variety of mounts out there with a manufacturer like Zeiss? Get rid of mount specifications altogether or somehow group them? For instance, the ZF/ZF2/ZE variations are all optically equivalent, as far as I know.

We could always use
35/1.4 (ZM)
35/1.4 (ZF.2)
etc.

but I can also do mount definitions like "ZF/ZF2/ZE" in specs, so one lens with all the mounts would be listed there in that case.

nero_design wrote in post #18762682
I wouldn't know about that "same person who wrote the code for the whole site from scratch" because the site has no contact details for any such person.

What you missed is at the bottom of the page. It looks like this:

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Canon Mirrorless Camera EOS M100 please. Thank you.

Pekka-

Thank you very much for all that you do!

Pekka wrote in post #18762936
We could always use
35/1.4 (ZM)
35/1.4 (ZF.2)
etc.

but I can also do mount definitions like "ZF/ZF2/ZE" in specs, so one lens with all the mounts would be listed there in that case.

I guess that it's a matter of what makes the most sense, in terms of making sure that people can post and find relevant info, and balancing that with not making too much work for ya.

New gear added:

https://photography-on-the.net …index.php?list=​all&latest
Click that [EXPAND ALL] to see it all.

Those are lenses and cameras which were released after last update. I'll check this and other threads for requests for other lenses/cameras/flashes​/bags and update them tomorrow.

I hate to mention this, but in the link, the EOS R is listed under "DSLR" instead of "mirrorless"

Pekka wrote in post #18763070
New gear added:

https://photography-on-the.net …index.php?list=​all&latest
Click that [EXPAND ALL] to see it all.

Those are lenses and cameras which were released after last update. I'll check this and other threads for requests for other lenses/cameras/flashes​/bags and update them tomorrow.

Thank You Pekka - sincerely.


P.

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #18763113
I hate to mention this, but in the link, the EOS R is listed under "DSLR" instead of "mirrorless"

Also, several of the EOS M cameras are listed under DSLR instead of mirrorless as well.