scobols wrote in post #18784149
I own both and agree with this. Also, not only 1/6th the cost, but also about 1/3 the weight.
Same here, own both, love the 200/2 but.... as said before...
In the real world 99% of customers have no idea what lens was used where, I even find it hard at times with no image data.
I hardly ever use my 200/2, tragic I know. I use my 135 all the time, given its one of the cheapest lenses I own it produces some of the best portraits I have ever taken, The 135 is a classic lens that I feel many will be reluctant to give credit too, as in, its a secret little gem..