Sony Lounge Thread MKIII (All Sony cameras welcome)

digital_AM wrote in post #18793066
The Batis is slightly sharper in the corner than the 16-35 GM.

---------------

Surprisingly, I haven't shot this section of the San Antonio River. This is behind the new Witte Museum during some beautiful morning light.

Loxia 21

IMAGE LINK: https://www.alfredomor​aphoto.com …oads/n-KGp2Jw/i-wFZKhTv/A

Beautiful! You have such elegant trees in your area. So much character.

David Arbogast wrote in post #18793156
Beautiful! You have such elegant trees in your area. So much character.

Thank you David! That we do. The cypress trees along the Guadalupe, Frio, and San Marcos rivers are also beautiful in the spring and fall.

Ben DDS wrote in post #18793117
I just had a few of my photos selected to be printed in the American Student Dental Association magazine! I'll make sure to post a link when the March edition gets put online. Pretty cool!

Congrats!!

I too have a photo that is being published in an upcoming book; a National Geographic publication! I think it’s shipping next month if I recall correctly. The book title is 100 Dives of a Lifetime. Unfortunately it was an older photo taken with my 5D III and a TS-E 24 II in Charleston, SC. Still, pretty exciting getting in a National Geographic publication.

EDIT: Just peeked on Amazon and it’s showing a Feb. 26 release day. I’m thoroughly mystified as to how my photo will fit into that book.

DTBaan wrote in post #18793000
at the conclusion part, he mentioned the f4 with 100x100 filter.

I recently notice that the 100x100 on the 16-35 gm will have a problem. Filter is too small and will have cut corners. I'll show an example later tonight. (no promise... :P)

nothing fancy. just a quickie. first pic I attempted to try and get the best, 2nd is to show when rotating the filter kit. using lee foundation kit.

David Arbogast wrote in post #18793158
Congrats!!

I too have a photo that is being published in an upcoming book; a National Geographic publication! I think it’s shipping next month if I recall correctly. The book title is 100 Dives of a Lifetime. Unfortunately it was an older photo taken with my 5D III and a TS-E 24 II in Charleston, SC. Still, pretty exciting getting in a National Geographic publication.

EDIT: Just peeked on Amazon and it’s showing a Feb. 26 release day. I’m thoroughly mystified as to how my photo will fit into that book.

nice! grats to you as well. Hope I can remember to check it out

DTBaan wrote in post #18793000
at the conclusion part, he mentioned the f4 with 100x100 filter.

I recently notice that the 100x100 on the 16-35 gm will have a problem. Filter is too small and will have cut corners. I'll show an example later tonight. (no promise... :P)

I’ve shot an 82mm filter lens in the past with 100x100 lee filters and it’s fine. You need to use a wide angle adapter ring

Dlee13 wrote in post #18793131
My Manfrotto ball head is still going quite strong but I'm not thinking it's maybe easier to get a Sirui ballhead which are Arca Swiss compatible then get the L bracket which I was looking at before ߘ

I’ve avoided manfrotto over the years for that reason and just stick to arca compatibile

DTBaan wrote in post #18793176
nothing fancy. just a quickie. first pic I attempted to try and get the best, 2nd is to show when rotating the filter kit. using lee foundation kit.

Hosted photo: posted by DTBaan in
./showthread.php?p=187​93176&i=i6872232
forum: Sony Digital Cameras

Hosted photo: posted by DTBaan in
./showthread.php?p=187​93176&i=i85845997
forum: Sony Digital Cameras

Can you post a photo of the filter setup on the lens?

TRhoads wrote in post #18793090
oh, BTW...is anyone else not seeing all the usual EXIF data on FLICKR anymore? it used to show up right there under the image...now all I see is the camera body...

Same for me. Just camera body now and no lens or exposure info! WTF?!

xpfloyd wrote in post #18793184
Can you post a photo of the filter setup on the lens?

xpfloyd wrote in post #18793181
I’ve shot an 82mm filter lens in the past with 100x100 lee filters and it’s fine. You need to use a wide angle adapter ring

not a setup. just the kit. and it is a wide angle adapter :P

I can take a pic of it attached tomorrow. i'm about to call it a night. but it was pretty much attached to the lens without any filters.

xpfloyd wrote in post #18793185
Same for me. Just camera body now and no lens or exposure info! WTF?!

same here. i'm not too worried. they always doing something. :P

DTBaan wrote in post #18793188
not a setup. just the kit. and it is a wide angle adapter :P

I can take a pic of it attached tomorrow. i'm about to call it a night. but it was pretty much attached to the lens without any filters.

Hosted photo: posted by DTBaan in
./showthread.php?p=187​93188&i=i122203256
forum: Sony Digital Cameras

That’s strange. When I shot the canon tse24ii it was 82mm and I couldn’t make it do that

xpfloyd wrote in post #18793194
That’s strange. When I shot the canon tse24ii it was 82mm and I couldn’t make it do that

sorry I should mention that this is at the wide end (16mm)

zooming in would not have the problem.

DTBaan wrote in post #18793198
sorry I should mention that this is at the wide end (16mm)

zooming in would not have the problem.

Sorry just woke up, that’s a good point! DOH!

navydoc wrote in post #18790589
I believe it's still considered the Inland Empire. I live in Riverside County about 30 miles (as the crow flies) south-east of the city of Riverside.

I was born in Huntington Park and lived in Compton and Maywood but I spent most of my growing up years in Bell Gardens. My dad was born in Compton in 1910.

Hosted photo: posted by navydoc in
./showthread.php?p=187​90589&i=i149353685
forum: Sony Digital Cameras

I've been out near you a few times. I have friends that live in Lake Elsinore and I shot a wedding in Menefee last March

sorry for bringing up old posts, I'm just getting caught up from Christmas lol