Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Transportation 
Thread started 25 Nov 2008 (Tuesday) 00:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Post your Freighter or big boat thread

 
Ray.Petri
I’m full of useless facts
Avatar
6,572 posts
Gallery: 3138 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 24766
Joined Mar 2005
Location: North Kent UK
Post edited over 4 years ago by Ray.Petri.
     
Mar 11, 2019 03:29 |  #1561

WestCoastCannuck wrote in post #18826052 (external link)
Was birding with my 300/2.8 and 1.4X (unsuccessfully) and thought this scene was nice. Only trouble was I could not fit the ship in the frame - I could have just taken off the teleconverter but was lazy and stitched 4 horizontal frames instead.

Please click on link for a nice large view showing some pretty good details on the freighter - and a pretty cool mirage effect on the more distant ship.

Best regards

Mike

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://photos.smugmug​.com …/77750596/O/i-tjgmnCq.jpg  (external link)

Hi Mike, I often stitch my shipping shots when I can’t be bothered to change the lens or remove the telecoverter. However, if successful it does result in a higher definition image, trouble is it has to have it’s pixels squeezed for the forum. But they still seem surprisingly good.
Another problem I have found is that if you don’t keep an eye on the automatic stitching you can get an extra section of the ship stitched in or left out.
Also, I could get many shots using the 24-105 but I prefer to stitch two or three shots using a higher quality lens - 70-200L II or 100-400L II. But a complex background can be a problem when the ship is moving against it.

Regards


Ray-P
When all else fails - Read the instructions!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ray.Petri
I’m full of useless facts
Avatar
6,572 posts
Gallery: 3138 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 24766
Joined Mar 2005
Location: North Kent UK
Post edited over 4 years ago by Ray.Petri. (3 edits in all)
     
Mar 12, 2019 02:07 |  #1562

Sunrise Ace Tilbury Dock. River Thames UK - Yesterday 11th May 2019

This is a three shot pano stitched in PS CS6. I used the 24-105 MkII.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2019/03/2/LQ_965929.jpg
Image hosted by forum (965929) © Ray.Petri [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Ray-P
When all else fails - Read the instructions!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chadmcm
Senior Member
337 posts
Likes: 72
Joined May 2008
Location: Vancouver, Washington
     
Mar 12, 2019 10:23 as a reply to  @ post 18824977 |  #1563

I didn't have time to get to Ford Island and the Missouri when I was in Honolulu, but I did get to the Arizona. Toured the Mo in Bremerton as a kid and in Astoria when it was being transferred to Pearl (above decks tour only - everything was welded shut for the tow). Gonna get back someday and see what they've done with her.


Chad McMurry
Vancouver, WA USA

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ray.Petri
I’m full of useless facts
Avatar
6,572 posts
Gallery: 3138 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 24766
Joined Mar 2005
Location: North Kent UK
     
Mar 14, 2019 01:03 |  #1564

shocolite wrote in post #18825147 (external link)
Personally I think container ships have gone too big. Understandably economy of scale rules in favour of the owners and shippers using such large vessels but as has been witnessed in the past 2 or 3 months there has been several incidents of containers being lost overboard.

One major problem is that the shippers of each container often overload them and then deliberately under-declare the weight. On a large containers ship this can mean a difference of thousands of tonnes. And putting heaving containers up top increases the stresses of the containers below and also of the lashing gear securing them.

Believe it or not, many ports still do not weight the containers as they are being loaded onto the ships.

I was on one container ship were we had about 30 containers collapse due to an old printing press (weighing about 25 tonnes) started moving inside the container causing sidewall damage and eventually crashing through into adjacent containers. Upon investigation it transpired the printing press had not been secured or lashed down in the container and when the vessel encountered heavy seas the damage was done. Many people underestimate how much cargo ships roll and don't realise that despite their size, Mother Nature always has the upper hand.

It is not the responsibility of this occurring that is of primary concern to those onboard the vessel but that your lives are put at risk by such incidents. And regrettably this is true of many other areas of industry.

Hi Shocolite. We frequently hear about large containers being washed up or floating around the oceans - but have you - or anyone else - any experience of a cargo ship hitting one and the damage caused? Would you try to recover them or just leave them?

Regards.


Ray-P
When all else fails - Read the instructions!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Dexs
Goldmember
Avatar
2,875 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 919
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Crete Greece.
     
Mar 14, 2019 01:59 |  #1565

Ray.Petri wrote in post #18828519 (external link)
Hi Shocolite. We frequently hear about large containers being washed up or floating around the oceans - but have you - or anyone else - any experience of a cargo ship hitting one and the damage caused? Would you try to recover them or just leave them?

Regards.

When containers do fall off they either sink or they float similar to an iceberg, most of their mass below the surface, these are the dangerous ones. Many ocean going yachts have hit these and either have sunk or been badly damaged. During my many years working at sea I've seen an awful lot of these metal 'icebergs'. Trying to recover a lost container is almost impossible due to the fact many container ships do not have the cranes and 'if' they did have cranes the risk of getting damaged is far too much.


Canon R6 II, RF 800mm.
I like what I like.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ltdave
it looks like im post #19,016
Avatar
5,659 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 8505
Joined Apr 2012
Location: the farthest point east in michigan
     
Mar 14, 2019 05:15 |  #1566

chadmcm wrote in post #18827610 (external link)
I didn't have time to get to Ford Island and the Missouri when I was in Honolulu, but I did get to the Arizona. Toured the Mo in Bremerton as a kid and in Astoria when it was being transferred to Pearl (above decks tour only - everything was welded shut for the tow). Gonna get back someday and see what they've done with her.


is access to the Missouri only via Ford Island? Im no longer active duty and didnt retire so I wouldnt be allowed to go to Ford (i dont THINK). used to be only active duty, dependent and retired could board the ferry to Ford Island, but this was way before the Missouri was transferred there...

id love to take my wife to Hawaii. I used to stay at Bellows Field AFS in the cabins when i caught hops, nearly 30-35 years ago...


-im just trying. sometimes i succeed

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ray.Petri
I’m full of useless facts
Avatar
6,572 posts
Gallery: 3138 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 24766
Joined Mar 2005
Location: North Kent UK
     
Mar 14, 2019 06:45 |  #1567

Red Dexs wrote in post #18828536 (external link)
When containers do fall off they either sink or they float similar to an iceberg, most of their mass below the surface, these are the dangerous ones. Many ocean going yachts have hit these and either have sunk or been badly damaged. During my many years working at sea I've seen an awful lot of these metal 'icebergs'. Trying to recover a lost container is almost impossible due to the fact many container ships do not have the cranes and 'if' they did have cranes the risk of getting damaged is far too much.

Thanks for your comment Red, I was thinking that would be the case. But could it ‘hole’ a container ship and cause it to sink?
What about a tanker, or small warship?


Ray-P
When all else fails - Read the instructions!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Capn ­ Jack
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,179 posts
Gallery: 2961 photos
Likes: 27724
Joined Mar 2010
Location: NE USA
     
Mar 14, 2019 16:37 |  #1568

Straight of Messina, double-ended ferry

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2019/03/2/LQ_966360.jpg
Image hosted by forum (966360) © Capn Jack [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chadmcm
Senior Member
337 posts
Likes: 72
Joined May 2008
Location: Vancouver, Washington
     
Mar 14, 2019 23:37 as a reply to  @ Ltdave's post |  #1569

It was several years ago, but as I recall you had to access through the base there - a bus ride and formal tour that I just didn't have time for that trip. I could be wrong, though.


Chad McMurry
Vancouver, WA USA

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shocolite
Senior Member
Avatar
251 posts
Gallery: 55 photos
Likes: 191
Joined Mar 2014
Location: Ireland (when I do get home!)
     
Mar 15, 2019 00:47 |  #1570

Ray.Petri wrote in post #18828519 (external link)
Hi Shocolite. We frequently hear about large containers being washed up or floating around the oceans - but have you - or anyone else - any experience of a cargo ship hitting one and the damage caused? Would you try to recover them or just leave them?

Regards.

Hi Ray, no any vessel I have been on has not hit a container (that we were aware of). But a colleague of mine hit a container whilst sailing across from Britain to a European port - he ended up having to radio for assistance as the sailboat was taking on to much water. Both he and the boat did make it to port but a lot of damage was caused to his boat.

We'd never try to recover them but would send a message to relevant authorities about any containers sighted at sea.


Canon 80D, 700D & G7 X; EF-S 10-18/18-135 STM, EF-S 18-135 IS USM, 50 F1.4, 100 F2.8L Macro, 16-35 F4L, 70-200 F4L IS; 100-400 L II, Speedlite 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shocolite
Senior Member
Avatar
251 posts
Gallery: 55 photos
Likes: 191
Joined Mar 2014
Location: Ireland (when I do get home!)
     
Mar 15, 2019 01:02 |  #1571

Ray.Petri wrote in post #18828607 (external link)
Thanks for your comment Red, I was thinking that would be the case. But could it ‘hole’ a container ship and cause it to sink?
What about a tanker, or small warship?

Hi Ray, overall I don't think (and am not aware of) containers causing such damage to larger ships. Been a long time since I was on container vessels but the steel on containers is only 3mm thick (if I remember rightly. Only the 4 corner posts are structural/load bearing and of heavier gauge. An empty container is only about 3t weight.

So most larger ships would probably suffer paint scuffing at worst - the hull plating of the ships I was on was about 10mm thick, coupled with the structural framing so fairly strong. But smaller warships (such as those involved with mine clearance) can be of glass fibre construction and I would strongly suspect that a container could likely cause serious damage to such vessels.

The biggest risk is to sailing/power recreational vessels. Whilst never proved to be the cause, a partially submerged container was believed to be the cause of the flooding and sinking of the Irish tall ship sail training vessel "Asgard II" about 10 years ago in the Bay of Biscay, thankfully with no loss of life. Asgard II was a timber hulled vessel.


Canon 80D, 700D & G7 X; EF-S 10-18/18-135 STM, EF-S 18-135 IS USM, 50 F1.4, 100 F2.8L Macro, 16-35 F4L, 70-200 F4L IS; 100-400 L II, Speedlite 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ray.Petri
I’m full of useless facts
Avatar
6,572 posts
Gallery: 3138 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 24766
Joined Mar 2005
Location: North Kent UK
     
Mar 15, 2019 02:05 |  #1572

shocolite wrote in post #18828999 (external link)
Hi Ray, overall I don't think (and am not aware of) containers causing such damage to larger ships. Been a long time since I was on container vessels but the steel on containers is only 3mm thick (if I remember rightly. Only the 4 corner posts are structural/load bearing and of heavier gauge. An empty container is only about 3t weight.

So most larger ships would probably suffer paint scuffing at worst - the hull plating of the ships I was on was about 10mm thick, coupled with the structural framing so fairly strong. But smaller warships (such as those involved with mine clearance) can be of glass fibre construction and I would strongly suspect that a container could likely cause serious damage to such vessels.

The biggest risk is to sailing/power recreational vessels. Whilst never proved to be the cause, a partially submerged container was believed to be the cause of the flooding and sinking of the Irish tall ship sail training vessel "Asgard II" about 10 years ago in the Bay of Biscay, thankfully with no loss of life. Asgard II was a timber hulled vessel.

Thanks for your detailed replies and the interesting information.
But a 3 ton container, colliding with a 10mm thick hull at 30 knots would have worried me a bit!:-(


Ray-P
When all else fails - Read the instructions!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Dexs
Goldmember
Avatar
2,875 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 919
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Crete Greece.
Post edited over 4 years ago by Red Dexs.
     
Mar 15, 2019 02:39 |  #1573

Ray.Petri wrote in post #18828607 (external link)
Thanks for your comment Red, I was thinking that would be the case. But could it ‘hole’ a container ship and cause it to sink?
What about a tanker, or small warship?

They are lethal to a small vessel Ray, they could though 'potentially' punch a hole in any ship, especially if its old and the plates are thin. Ships are made of many separate compartments and with a competent crew can be sealed off with no danger to the ship. Tankers of certain capacities by law have to be doubled skinned to prevent incidents like this, also grounding etc.


Canon R6 II, RF 800mm.
I like what I like.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ray.Petri
I’m full of useless facts
Avatar
6,572 posts
Gallery: 3138 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 24766
Joined Mar 2005
Location: North Kent UK
     
Mar 15, 2019 02:56 |  #1574

Red Dexs wrote in post #18829016 (external link)
They are lethal to a small vessel Ray, they could though 'potentially' punch a hole in any ship, especially if its old and the plates are thin. Ships are made of many separate compartments and with a competent crew can be sealed off with no danger to the ship. Tankers of certain capacities by law have to be doubled skinned to prevent incidents like this, also grounding etc.

Thanks for your reply, Red.


Ray-P
When all else fails - Read the instructions!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Capn ­ Jack
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,179 posts
Gallery: 2961 photos
Likes: 27724
Joined Mar 2010
Location: NE USA
     
Mar 15, 2019 17:19 |  #1575

A two-fer here, Straight of Messina

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2019/03/3/LQ_966522.jpg
Image hosted by forum (966522) © Capn Jack [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

783,078 views & 3,938 likes for this thread, 405 members have posted to it and it is followed by 90 members.
Post your Freighter or big boat thread
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Transportation 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1278 guests, 154 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.