Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 18 Mar 2019 (Monday) 06:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Should a lens be stopped down before storing upright or horizontal?

 
vision35
Senior Member
660 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Likes: 528
Joined Nov 2007
Post edited over 3 years ago by vision35. (5 edits in all)
     
Mar 18, 2019 06:14 |  #1

Having purchased a few L lenses costing $1000 - $1400 I would like some opinions of proper lens storage.
Is it better to store the lens upright or horizontal?
Lens cap facing up or down?
Update: I will personally go with horizontal in a hard shell waterproof case. I really don't want to carry a heavy hard case measuring 10" or 12" deep. Maybe I will make a climate controlled storage cabinet. lol
I'll take a look at the packaging and a you tube Canon lens unpacking video and see how they arrive packaged from the factory. That should be good enough in theory.
Should the lens be stopped down before storage? Someone implied it may be better for the iris and springs.
I don't know if stopping down the lens prior to storing is good or bad for the lubricants. Will the lubricants run or dry up?
I recall many years ago seeing some FD lenses with an internal gooey mess.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bildeb0rg
Goldmember
Avatar
3,871 posts
Gallery: 817 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 4985
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Perthshire in Scotland
Post edited over 4 years ago by bildeb0rg.
     
Mar 18, 2019 06:17 |  #2

Won't make any difference unless you are talking years.
As an aside, I would advocate using, not storing lenses. Much more fun.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,908 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Mar 18, 2019 11:45 |  #3

vision35 wrote in post #18830666 (external link)
...
Should the lens be stopped down before storage? Someone implied it may be better for the iris and springs.
I don't know if stopping down the lens prior to storing is good or bad for the lubricants. Will the lubricants run or dry up?

This part is out of your control on a Canon "L" (or any EF) lens, so don't even consider it.

The lens is ALWAYS wide open, when stored, or on your camera, regardless of where your aperture is set. Springs hold it wide open, and can't be set otherwise.

Only when you release a shutter does the motor stop the lens down for the fraction second required, then it springs back wide open.


I also don;t imagine upright or horizontal matters. Canon's big lenses come with storage cases that hold them horizontal, but the smaller lenses come with pouches that hold them upright. This says to me that Canon doesn't care.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,707 posts
Likes: 4030
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Mar 18, 2019 12:13 |  #4

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #18830805 (external link)
....

The lens is ALWAYS wide open, when stored, or on your camera, regardless of where your aperture is set. Springs hold it wide open, and can't be set otherwise....

Actually, there is a way you can close the aperture to whatever f-stop you want. Reverse lens macro shooters will mount the reversed lens, set the aperture to their desired aperture, press the DOF preview button and then dismount the lens with the DOF preview button pressed.. The lens will stay at the previewed aperture.

I am not advocating doing so as I really don't think it matters how the lens is stored, but it is possible. For storing a lens, I believe it's more important to make sure both front and rear caps are on , and the lens is stores in a lens bag or lens case. For lenses that came bag-less, I place them in a Ziploc. This helps keep dust off the lens.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3429
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Mar 20, 2019 14:55 |  #5

just put the caps on, and store it however you want...


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,365 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1370
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
Post edited over 4 years ago by RDKirk.
     
Mar 20, 2019 15:17 |  #6

vision35 wrote in post #18830666 (external link)
Should the lens be stopped down before storage? Someone implied it may be better for the iris and springs.
I don't know if stopping down the lens prior to storing is good or bad for the lubricants. Will the lubricants run or dry up?

Back in the days of fully mechanical cameras with auto-aperture lenses, you could usually release the aperture off-camera to relax the springs.

However, the fact is that springs do not take a "set." That's a myth. So it never mattered.

Also back in those days it was possible for oil-based lubricants to harden if left unattended for years. But it didn't matter whether the aperture was left opened or closed--it was going to harden either way. More of a likely problem was leaving the lens in an area of really high temperatures, like on the car seat in the summer. That really did hold the possibility of evaporating lubrication within the lens to be deposited on the interior lens elements.

As far as I can tell, modern lenses use low-friction blade coatings that don't need lubrication.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,908 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
Post edited over 4 years ago by CyberDyneSystems. (4 edits in all)
     
Mar 20, 2019 15:48 as a reply to  @ gjl711's post |  #7

EDIT: Well, I'll be damned,.
Learn something new every day.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chuckmiller
Goldmember
Avatar
4,178 posts
Gallery: 65 photos
Likes: 10540
Joined May 2012
Location: Lakeland, Florida
     
Mar 30, 2019 14:08 |  #8

If springs hold the blades open I can't see where it would be beneficial to pull on them and hold them in a well stressed state. Yes I understand that it is cycles of movement that causes wear on a spring but I have also seen springs that were stretched and left for a long period and then would not recover. You be the judge.


.
.
.
Retired from Fire/Rescue with 30 years on the job - January 2019

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Mar 30, 2019 15:07 |  #9

I store all my lenses diagonally at 37.5 degrees and rotate them every third lunar cycle on the first quarter of a waxing moon.

But really though, this thought does pop into my mind from time to time when throwing lenses in a bag or something. But then I realize it's probably a silly thought and go with convenient and random placement.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,607 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8338
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Mar 30, 2019 15:31 |  #10

vision35 wrote in post #18830666 (external link)
Having a few L lenses costing $1000 - $1400

I have L lenses costing from $900 to $7,800.
.

vision35 wrote in post #18830666 (external link)
I would like some opinions of proper lens storage.

My opinions about lens storage? . Hmmmm.

Well, right now my 400 f2.8 is in the back seat of my car, attached to a camera body. . Not in a case or anything, just laying on the seat on top of some stuff and under some other stuff.

There's lots of misc camping gear and so forth in that backseat, so the lens and camera just kinda ends up wherever it got put when it was used last. . If I used it real recently, then it goes on top of the camping stuff and the extra clothes and folding chair. . If I haven't used it for a few days, then the extra clothes and the folding chair and stuff end up getting used and put back on top of the lens & camera. . My backseat is kinda like a geological dig - you can tell what has happened most recently by what is on top, in the middle, and on the bottom, of the layers of gear and whatnot.

I almost always leave the lenses and camera gear in the backseat of my car. . Summer. . Winter. . Spring and Fall. . At home. . Away on trips. . I really don't see any reason to carry my gear inside when all I'm going to do is carry it back out to the car at some point. . Why not just leave it in the car where I'll need it next? . Same with the camping gear, blinds, tools, extra clothes, chest waders, boots, camouflage, snacks, drinks, etc. . I just leave it all in the car all the time and then I don't have to bother packing anything when I go somewhere to do something.
.

vision35 wrote in post #18830666 (external link)
Is it better to store the lens upright or horizontal?

Just however they end up. . Doesn't matter. . Not worth thinking about.
.

vision35 wrote in post #18830666 (external link)
Lens cap facing up or down?

Lens cap? . I don't usually bother with lens caps. . No need to really. . The front elements seldom get scratched, and when they do, the little scratches don't affect the lens' performance at all. . Caps just aint worth hassling with.
.

vision35 wrote in post #18830666 (external link)
Should the lens be stopped down before storage? Someone implied it may be better for the iris and springs.
I don't know if stopping down the lens prior to storing is good or bad for the lubricants. Will the lubricants run or dry up?

There's no ned to consider any of this. Just put 'em wherever it's easiest and where they won't fall on anything hard, if jostled. . L lenses are really tough and you don't have to baby them or give any special attention to how they are stored or treated. Ever.



.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,393 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Mar 30, 2019 15:38 |  #11

I swaddle mine in bubble wrap and then hermetically seal in a scaled down model of the great pyramid of Giza  :p


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,365 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1370
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Mar 30, 2019 16:26 |  #12

chuckmiller wrote in post #18837548 (external link)
If springs hold the blades open I can't see where it would be beneficial to pull on them and hold them in a well stressed state. Yes I understand that it is cycles of movement that causes wear on a spring but I have also seen springs that were stretched and left for a long period and then would not recover. You be the judge.

Those must have been springs stretched beyond their design specification. That doesn't happen to a spring that is used within its design spec, whether compressed or stretched. That's a function of the fatigue capability of the metal.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ozziepuppy
Goldmember
Avatar
3,286 posts
Gallery: 203 photos
Likes: 1442
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Kansas
     
Mar 30, 2019 17:43 as a reply to  @ RDKirk's post |  #13

Left Handed Brisket wrote in post #18837570 (external link)
I store all my lenses diagonally at 37.5 degrees and rotate them every third lunar cycle on the first quarter of a waxing moon.

ed rader wrote in post #18837581 (external link)
I swaddle mine in bubble wrap and then hermetically seal in a scaled down model of the great pyramid of Giza  :p


Wow, I do both of these (depends on my mood). I didn't realize I wasn't the only one. #kindredspirits


Marci
Constructive criticism always appreciated.
Gear
Pre-2018 Feedback :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,908 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Mar 30, 2019 20:38 |  #14

I let mine age in an oak barrel for 16 years. the images I get are smoother, more full bodied with a distinct peaty flavor.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crofter
Senior Member
404 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 372
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Weardale UK
Post edited over 4 years ago by crofter. (3 edits in all)
     
Mar 31, 2019 07:34 |  #15

ed rader wrote in post #18837581 (external link)
I swaddle mine in bubble wrap and then hermetically seal in a scaled down model of the great pyramid of Giza  :p

Wise move with the pyramid,It's a well known fact that razor blades stay sharp if kept in a pyramid,I've no reason to believe that lenses would not similarly benefit,in fact I'm going to start wearing a pyramid hat to keep my wits sharp.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/70718847@N02/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,414 views & 19 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it and it is followed by 9 members.
Should a lens be stopped down before storing upright or horizontal?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1212 guests, 120 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.