Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
Thread started 30 Dec 2015 (Wednesday) 12:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Post your Bird Portraits

 
this thread is locked
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
14,523 posts
Gallery: 706 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 45583
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Apr 28, 2019 10:13 |  #40741

Lame-Duck wrote in post #18852551 (external link)
Why wasn't it just named a yellow-rumped warbler? Oh, never mind; that name was already taken. Nice shot, Archi.

Thanks for the comment. I don't know where the names come from. I suspect advertising folks are involved! Names with words like gold and lemon seem to be preferred over orange and yellow.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. C&C always welcome. Picture editing OK. Donate to POTN here
.
I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robamy
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,682 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 99422
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Chepachet, RI
     
Apr 28, 2019 10:33 |  #40742

N.V.M. wrote in post #18852650 (external link)
this is from my backyard.


QUOTED IMAGE

Awesome, I would love them to come to my suet. I see them fly by now and then but never had one visit the suet.


flickr https://www.flickr.com​/photos/robamyphotos/ (external link)
Instagram #RobAmyNature
YouTubehttps://www.youtube.co​m …/UCXHzc4eU2AfHU​CuGW31GNdA (external link)
Vimeo https://vimeo.com/roba​myvideos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robamy
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,682 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 99422
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Chepachet, RI
Post edited over 3 years ago by robamy.
     
Apr 28, 2019 10:37 |  #40743

I played with the 400mm f2.8 Mk III at 1120mm today. I used the 2x III + 12mm tube + 1.4x III in live view. Results are pretty good.

IMAGE: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/32779071777_20dc8abbfc_h.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/RWzj​2X  (external link) Red Bellied @ 1120mm (external link) by A & R Photography (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/47722352391_d3491f0ac0_h.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2fH4​wKa  (external link) American Goldfinch @ 1120mm (external link) by A & R Photography (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/47722806491_d4371b4632_h.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2fH6​RJt  (external link) American Robin @ 1120mm (external link) by A & R Photography (external link), on Flickr

flickr https://www.flickr.com​/photos/robamyphotos/ (external link)
Instagram #RobAmyNature
YouTubehttps://www.youtube.co​m …/UCXHzc4eU2AfHU​CuGW31GNdA (external link)
Vimeo https://vimeo.com/roba​myvideos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
14,523 posts
Gallery: 706 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 45583
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Apr 28, 2019 10:51 |  #40744

robamy wrote in post #18852724 (external link)
I played with the 400mm f2.8 Mk III at 1120mm today. I used the 2x III + 12mm tube + 1.4x III in live view. Results are pretty good.

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/RWzj​2X  (external link) Red Bellied @ 1120mm (external link) by A & R Photography (external link), on Flickr

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2fH4​wKa  (external link) American Goldfinch @ 1120mm (external link) by A & R Photography (external link), on Flickr

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2fH6​RJt  (external link) American Robin @ 1120mm (external link) by A & R Photography (external link), on Flickr

Amazing.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. C&C always welcome. Picture editing OK. Donate to POTN here
.
I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shalu
The Bird Whisperer
Avatar
3,702 posts
Gallery: 2602 photos
Best ofs: 17
Likes: 77693
Joined Sep 2017
Location: Los Altos, California
Post edited over 3 years ago by shalu. (2 edits in all)
     
Apr 28, 2019 11:16 |  #40745

robamy wrote in post #18852724 (external link)
I played with the 400mm f2.8 Mk III at 1120mm today. I used the 2x III + 12mm tube + 1.4x III in live view. Results are pretty good.

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/RWzj​2X  (external link) Red Bellied @ 1120mm (external link) by A & R Photography (external link), on Flickr

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2fH4​wKa  (external link) American Goldfinch @ 1120mm (external link) by A & R Photography (external link), on Flickr

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2fH6​RJt  (external link) American Robin @ 1120mm (external link) by A & R Photography (external link), on Flickr

Excellent results from stacked TCs, Rob! If you use 2X Mark II, you don't need any extension tube and will retain full infinity focus. At my recommendation, my friend (actually two of them) bought 3 2X Mark II and stacked them all together to get ID shots of distant birds (he used Canon 600II lens on Sony A9) :-P:lol:

Lame-Duck wrote in post #18852554 (external link)
Very nicely done, Shalu.

Thank you very much, Mike!

Turkey vulture eating a dead fish

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2019/04/4/LQ_974594.jpg
Image hosted by forum (974594) © shalu [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Facebook (external link) Sony α9 •α7R4•100-400mm•600mm f/4•400mm f/2.8•1.4X•2X•135mm f/1.8 •50mm f/1.2•Samyang 35mm F2.8•24mm F2.8•Tamron 28-75mm F2.8•Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 Art•Laowa 85mm f/5.6 macro|Canon M6 II•6D•T6i•EF 85mm f/1.8 USM•EF 200mm f/2.8L•EF 50mm f/1.8 STM•EF-S 24mm STM•EF-S 10-18mm STM•EF-S 55-250mm STM•Sigma 150-600mm C•7Artisans 60mm II macro•Laowa 15mm f/4 macro•100mm f/2.8 2X macro•12mm f/2.8•Tamron 100-400mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ in ­ Texas
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,269 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 164231
Joined Mar 2014
Location: SE Texas
     
Apr 28, 2019 11:20 |  #40746

Wood thrush, male

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2019/04/4/LQ_974595.jpg
Image hosted by forum (974595) © Bill in Texas [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Bill being Smug (external link)
Bill's flickr (external link)
Sony a7, a1, a9, Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS Lens, Tamron 70-180mm, F2.8 Di III VXD, Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6,3 GM OSS, Sony FE 1.4X teleconverter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
31,862 posts
Gallery: 3035 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 37766
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Post edited over 2 years ago by Lester Wareham.
     
Apr 28, 2019 11:28 |  #40747

IMAGE: http://www.zen20934.zen.co.uk/GalleryPics/Photos/Birds/General/Finches/birds%20Siskin%20m%20A06_007_09-03-19.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.zen20934.zen.co.uk/GalleryPics/Photos/Birds/General/Finches/birds%20Siskin%20f%20A01_002_09-03-19.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.zen20934.zen.co.uk/GalleryPics/Photos/Birds/General/Finches/birds%20Siskin%20m%20A03_003_09-03-19.jpg

My Photography Home Page (external link)
Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV
flickr (external link) Flickr Home (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ in ­ Arizona
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,523 posts
Gallery: 1449 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 107804
Joined Nov 2009
     
Apr 28, 2019 12:26 |  #40748

robamy wrote in post #18852724 (external link)
I played with the 400mm f2.8 Mk III at 1120mm today. I used the 2x III + 12mm tube + 1.4x III in live view. Results are pretty good.

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/RWzj​2X  (external link) Red Bellied @ 1120mm (external link) by A & R Photography (external link), on Flickr

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2fH4​wKa  (external link) American Goldfinch @ 1120mm (external link) by A & R Photography (external link), on Flickr

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2fH6​RJt  (external link) American Robin @ 1120mm (external link) by A & R Photography (external link), on Flickr

Hi Rob...

Fantastic work with that amount of converters and tube. Have you tried stacking the 1.4x III and 2x III using the Canon 100-400 II lens? If so, I'd like to hear your evaluation of that combination. Also, I'm new to the concept of stacking converters and don't know what the rationale is for using an extension tube. Any advice would be appreciated.

Thanks
Tom


The sound of birds stops the noise in my mind.” - Carly Simon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Terrycanon
Goldmember
Avatar
3,613 posts
Gallery: 2284 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 28740
Joined Mar 2016
Location: Lancashire, UK
     
Apr 28, 2019 12:35 |  #40749

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2019/04/4/LQ_974601.jpg
Image hosted by forum (974601)
© Terrycanon
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
  



It's all about the light...
See more of my pictures on Flickr: tezzerh

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robamy
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,682 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 99422
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Chepachet, RI
     
Apr 28, 2019 13:08 |  #40750

Tom in Arizona wrote in post #18852749 (external link)
Hi Rob...

Fantastic work with that amount of converters and tube. Have you tried stacking the 1.4x III and 2x III using the Canon 100-400 II lens? If so, I'd like to hear your evaluation of that combination. Also, I'm new to the concept of stacking converters and don't know what the rationale is for using an extension tube. Any advice would be appreciated.

Thanks
Tom

Hi Tom

Thanks for the comment. I never tried it with the 100-400mm II as I sold the lens awhile back. I am guessing quality will suffer a bit seeing you are starting off at F5.6 vs F 2.8. You only need the extension tube if you are using the Ver III extenders because they do not fit together like the Ver II extenders did due to the new design. You can use the 1.4x II and. 2x II without a tube. I never tried it as I have only the Ver III extenders to compare quality.


flickr https://www.flickr.com​/photos/robamyphotos/ (external link)
Instagram #RobAmyNature
YouTubehttps://www.youtube.co​m …/UCXHzc4eU2AfHU​CuGW31GNdA (external link)
Vimeo https://vimeo.com/roba​myvideos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shooz
Goldmember
Avatar
3,450 posts
Gallery: 165 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 60030
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Blenheim, Ontario, Canada
     
Apr 28, 2019 13:22 |  #40751

IMAGE: https://live.staticflickr.com/7924/46325306485_b1d6a8e14c_h.jpg

Eastern Screech Owl

Dave
davidhuffman.myportfol​io.com
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
14,523 posts
Gallery: 706 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 45583
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Apr 28, 2019 13:30 |  #40752

robamy wrote in post #18852768 (external link)
Hi Tom

Thanks for the comment. I never tried it with the 100-400mm II as I sold the lens awhile back. I am guessing quality will suffer a bit seeing you are starting off at F5.6 vs F 2.8. You only need the extension tube if you are using the Ver III extenders because they do not fit together like the Ver II extenders did due to the new design. You can use the 1.4x II and. 2x II without a tube. I never tried it as I have only the Ver III extenders to compare quality.

Canon should just come out with a 2.8X.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. C&C always welcome. Picture editing OK. Donate to POTN here
.
I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
recrisp
Goldmember
Avatar
2,552 posts
Gallery: 92 photos
Likes: 2767
Joined May 2008
Location: Paris, Texas
     
Apr 28, 2019 13:33 |  #40753

Tom in Arizona wrote in post #18852749 (external link)
Hi Rob...

Have you tried stacking the 1.4x III and 2x III using the Canon 100-400 II lens? If so, I'd like to hear your evaluation of that combination. Also, I'm new to the concept of stacking converters and don't know what the rationale is for using an extension tube. Any advice would be appreciated.

Thanks
Tom

Tom,
I looked this up on YouTube and found some information that might help you out some.

https://www.youtube.co​m …stacking+canon+​extenders+ (external link)

Just to help you out on the Canon 100-400mm vII, anything other than the Canon 1.4 extenders will not autofocus, it is futile to even try.
I have a Canon 400mm f/2.8 v1 and it will focus with a Canon 1.4x and the 2.0x, I can even shoot BiF with the 2.0x, but it is fairly slow. I use the Canon 1.4x ALL of the time on my Canon 100-400mm vII lens on my 7DmkII, it works so well that I usually leave it on. Some care for that, some don't. I can (usually) fix anything that I need in Photoshop.

Look at the video and then look at the surrounding videos there that may give you more light on this subject.

Randy


Gear List
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BirdsofBC
" eye candy, pure and simple"
Avatar
3,963 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 27801
Joined Sep 2010
Location: North Vancouver,Canada
     
Apr 28, 2019 13:40 |  #40754

this morning i found a Red-Shafted Flicker with only one leg.

IMAGE: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/32781396207_85a78d718c_h.jpg

https://birdsofbc.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jack ­ Dawe
Goldmember
Avatar
2,551 posts
Gallery: 367 photos
Likes: 7614
Joined Jul 2008
Location: UK
     
Apr 28, 2019 13:51 |  #40755

belas wrote in post #18852131 (external link)
Eurasian scops owl
Hosted photo: posted by belas in
./showthread.php?p=188​52131&i=i105122323
forum: Birds

Wonderful clarity!

shalu wrote in post #18852132 (external link)
Thank you very much, Mike!

some wren, not sure what kind
Hosted photo: posted by shalu in
./showthread.php?p=188​52132&i=i83314457
forum: Birds

House Wren. Lovely shot. You really nailed the eye - and the rest of the bird

PINNACLE wrote in post #18852394 (external link)
Dartford Warbler
QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2eip​KSi  (external link)
Dartford Warbler (external link) by Martin Billard (external link), on Flickr

That's mouth-watering! Great capture.


Canon 7D2 · 16-35 f/4L IS · 17-55 f/2.8 IS · 18-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS STM · 50 f/1.8 · 100 f/2.8 Macro · 100-400L IS II
Picture editing is OK. CC always welcome.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

21,492,020 views & 1,019,207 likes for this thread, 1069 members have posted to it and it is followed by 595 members.
Post your Bird Portraits
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Philipoc
1339 guests, 198 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.