Mostly for big landscape, but a touch of whatever.
RX100 VI. 24-200 f/2.8-4.5. Expensive but nice pocketable camera.
aezoss Senior Member More info | Jul 16, 2019 22:52 | #16 activeshooter wrote in post #18877740 Mostly for big landscape, but a touch of whatever. RX100 VI. 24-200 f/2.8-4.5. Expensive but nice pocketable camera.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
By-tor Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 07, 2019 10:35 | #17 I made the jump from a 5D & 7D with L glass to Olympus and Micro 4/3 6 years ago and didn't miss that heavy gear one bit. Recently I moved over to Fujifilm's X100F and X-T30 and really love the control setups and image's they produce and the size of these cameras and what they pack is just amazing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 12, 2019 16:14 | #18 Sold the 5D-IV back in Feb for a situation at hand. I liked the rig though after this time I've not felt pressed to get another SLR sized body.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
raminolta Member More info Post edited over 4 years ago by raminolta. (2 edits in all) | Aug 12, 2019 16:57 | #19 Depending on how compact you want it, I would be happy with a Sony A6400. There are also rumors, Sony may release a new high end APSC camera by the end of August. So that might be my choice. Couple them with a good zoom range lens and you get a top performant camera much smaller and more compact than big heavy DSLRs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 13, 2019 05:00 | #20 Have you considered compromising in the lens department ? Canon R3 | RP | 7D2+grip | EF 70-200mm f/2,8L IS II | EF 135mm f/2L | EF 50mm f/1,2L | RF 100mm f/2,8L | Tamron 24-70mm f/2,8 VC G2 | Tamron 17-35mm f/2,8-4 Di OSD | ZE 2/100mm | ZF 2/35mm | ZF 1,4/85mm | ZF 2/135mm | CV 1,4/58mm Nokton | Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2,8D | DC-Nikkor 105mm f/2D | Micro-Nikkor 200mm f/4D |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sibil Cream of the Crop 10,415 posts Likes: 54444 Joined Jan 2009 Location: SoCal More info | Aug 13, 2019 05:34 | #21 Ah-keong wrote in post #18909440 ...... and the 35-150mm f/2,8 - f/4 That Tamron is awful tempting.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kf095 Out buying Wheaties More info | Aug 13, 2019 15:01 | #22 If you ever get smaller camera for your most grueling trips, make sure you are prepared to deal with low capacity batteries. M-E and ME blog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
spacetuna Member 51 posts Likes: 40 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Cape Coral, FL United States More info | Nov 05, 2019 10:19 | #23 Try the Canon 24mm 2.8 pancake lens. It weighs next to nothing... Canon 6D Mark II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 06, 2019 09:40 | #24 spacetuna wrote in post #18955726 Try the Canon 24mm 2.8 pancake lens. It weighs next to nothing... I agree, I have the Canon 24mm f2.8 and it is tiny and light
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Danplane Hatchling 7 posts Likes: 7 Joined Oct 2019 More info Post edited over 3 years ago by Danplane. | Nov 19, 2019 14:43 | #25 The simple answer is that a professional carries the gear needed and puts up with the bulk, weight and inconvenience. A smart professional considers the shoot, plans the essential gear needed and improvises the rest. Note that essential gear may still be extensive, the difference is the elimination of the "everything but the kitchen sink" approach that is so commonly practiced. Either way, DSLR's and particularly the lenses, are heavy. If you are not looking for the money shot (that which your next mortgage payment depends upon) you can carry something smaller. Though good, the interchangeable lens mirrorless approach can quickly get you right back into the "too heavy, too much stuff" issue - which still gets old quickly. For super small, I use a canon g14 (has it's issues) and now a Sony VX100 MK VII - a better all-around, deal-with-whatever-I-have-to choice for several reasons. Aside from the Canon being slow to fire, the focal range of the Sony is far better, and the camera fits into a vest pocket - it's not perfect, but all around low bulk solution, it's better for what I need, despite the endless menus (computer geeks ought to stick to designing computers and leave camera designing to photographers). In a pinch, when I have to trade off the capability of my big kit, 1DXII's and associated white lenses (all heavy and large) for something small, with good technique and control, I can still get what I need.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RPCrowe Cream of the Crop More info Post edited over 3 years ago by RPCrowe. (4 edits in all) | Nov 20, 2019 09:52 | #26 I switched to Sony mirrorless (Both APSC and Full-Frame) from Canon DSLR cameras. Lots of folks say that the Tamron is not wide enough for use on a crop sensor camera. I have no problem with the short end but, I can carry a second Sony APSC camera with the 12mm f/2.0 Rokinon lens in combination with the A6400 and Tamron without suffering from the weight to any great degree. I will mount the Tamron on my A7iii for times when I need less mobility. Although the A7iii is a bit heavier than the A6400, it is still lighter than my Canon DSLR outfit it replaced. I love the A7iii + Tamron combination for studio shooting. IMAGE LINK: https://photos.smugmug.com …ISON_0193-X3.jpg&lb=1&s=A A good example of weight savings is my replacement of the Canon 7D2 and 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 lens with the A6400 and new 70-350mm f/4.6-6.3 lens. Yes, I lose 50mm on the long side but, I gain 30mm on the short side. I lose a half stop of so at maximum focal length but, the ISO capability of the A6400 more than makes up for that. Where the A6400 and Sony telephoto lens really shines is in the form factor comparison... The Canon combination is not only a lot larger but, it weighs 2480 grams (about FIVE and a HALF pounds) while the Sony combination clocks out at 1028 grams (about TWO and a QUARTER pounds). That is way less than half the weight of the Canon Combination. Oh yes! I can only use my 70-350mm OSS lens on my APSC cameras! Well I never used the big Canon glass on anything but my APSC Canon 7D or 7D2 cameras anyway.... Lots of full-frame fanboys say you HAVE TO SHOOT WITH FULL FRAME FOR GOOD RESULTS. Well I have just had a 16x24 inch metal photo print of this image shot with the A6400 and Tamron lens printed and it looks GREAT! IMAGE LINK: https://photos.smugmug.com …02019_9258-L.jpg&lb=1&s=A See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 13, 2020 05:13 | #27 Coming from the 7D mark II myself, have you considered the RP ? Canon R3 | RP | 7D2+grip | EF 70-200mm f/2,8L IS II | EF 135mm f/2L | EF 50mm f/1,2L | RF 100mm f/2,8L | Tamron 24-70mm f/2,8 VC G2 | Tamron 17-35mm f/2,8-4 Di OSD | ZE 2/100mm | ZF 2/35mm | ZF 1,4/85mm | ZF 2/135mm | CV 1,4/58mm Nokton | Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2,8D | DC-Nikkor 105mm f/2D | Micro-Nikkor 200mm f/4D |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 13, 2020 15:02 | #28 About a month back I was doing some house maintenance and spent a couple hours using the power tools. After driving screws for 30 minutes into a vertical orientation my forearm was sore. Didn't think much of it but as it turns out that brought on a case of tennis elbow/ tendonitis. Trying to grip a heavy camera would aggravate the condition.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vision35 Senior Member More info Post edited over 3 years ago by vision35. (3 edits in all) | Photography hobby and equipment, cellphone, computer mouse, power tools all add up and may eventually cause nasty pain.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 16, 2021 14:51 | #30 Ended up getting Sony a7iii and really like it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1470 guests, 124 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||