Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 17 Dec 2014 (Wednesday) 10:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM Review WOW!

 
awacsCZE
Member
186 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jun 2014
     
Oct 30, 2019 17:35 |  #10711

markesc wrote in post #18952756 (external link)
Non moving objects = yes

Moving objects = maybe/be prepared for frustration/heavily mixed results/inconsistencie​s (I had the 5div+1.4xiii and just ditched both for the 70d/80d + bare 100-400ii and found for BIF with backrounds that make for more memorable shots, not your yawnfest blue sky backrounds, keeper rate skyrocketed).

It's a good investment however if you have money for it, but you'll be forced down to F8 and center point AF only. It's a great combo for landscapes/moon rise shots, stuff that isn't difficult but just needs more magnification.


Thank you! Well, I shoot moving subjects a lot - planes, cars, animals.

I have 70D, but found it's ability to track and focus on fast objects much worse than 6D2. That's why I chose 6D2 as a second camera




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
awacsCZE
Member
186 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jun 2014
     
Oct 30, 2019 17:37 |  #10712

nardes wrote in post #18952899 (external link)
I have found that to get consistently good results requires good light, reasonably static subjects and good technique to avoid camera shake. Distant subject can be badly affected by atmospheric effects and will give poor image quality.

My x1.4 Extender does not get used very often, but I am very glad to have it in my kit so that when the few opportunities arise where it can be used, I can take advantage of it.

Note that on the Canon EOS R, I can move the AF point almost 100% around the viewfinder, so I am not limited to the centre point.

Cheers

Dennis

Thank you. I was thinking about it a lot, but currently finding more cons, than pros. I have 70D, but the image quality isn't best paired with 100-400 II so I upgraded to 6D2, which has wonderful IQ for me, but not enough reach though.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
markesc
Goldmember
3,613 posts
Gallery: 618 photos
Likes: 20443
Joined Feb 2014
     
Oct 30, 2019 21:59 |  #10713

awacsCZE wrote in post #18952947 (external link)
Thank you. I was thinking about it a lot, but currently finding more cons, than pros. I have 70D, but the image quality isn't best paired with 100-400 II so I upgraded to 6D2, which has wonderful IQ for me, but not enough reach though.

There's a big jump in quality from the 70d to 80d (there may be some nice deals on these right now)... you could checkout the 90d forums if you have a bit more to spend.

I think for full frame, I hate to say it, but it just needs to be a 500F4 or bigger = $$$ just my opinion




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David_MC
Goldmember
Avatar
1,582 posts
Gallery: 1550 photos
Likes: 12767
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Milford, Delaware, USA
     
Nov 02, 2019 13:52 |  #10714

Chilly Morning at Prime Hook NWR, Delaware.

1) Carolina Wren


2) Swamp Sparrow


3) Ruby-crowned Kinglet


4) Downy Woodpecker


5)


<insert witty signature here>
Fujifilm X-T5, XF16-80 f/4, XF70-300 f/4-5.6, XF23mm f/2, XF35mm f/2, XF150-600mm f/5.6-8.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Dexs
Goldmember
Avatar
2,875 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 919
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Crete Greece.
     
Nov 03, 2019 02:55 |  #10715

Ray.Petri wrote in post #18951122 (external link)
My High-speed internet connection. Photographed with the EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM
Mine is the top one on the right. Please note, contrary to what some might imagine, The UK is NOT a third world country!
Even the birds won't risk perching on it.

Hosted photo: posted by Ray.Petri in
./showthread.php?p=189​51122&i=i37844166
forum: Canon Lenses

Trust me Ray compared to my connection that is hi tech.


Canon R6 II, RF 800mm.
I like what I like.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ray.Petri
I’m full of useless facts
Avatar
6,572 posts
Gallery: 3138 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 24766
Joined Mar 2005
Location: North Kent UK
     
Nov 03, 2019 04:24 |  #10716

awacsCZE wrote in post #18952732 (external link)
Good day,

can I please ask for advice? Would you recommend buying 1.4 Extender for 100-400 L II + 6D mkII combo? Is it worth it?

Thank you very much for help

Perhaps not directly answering your question but I use the 1.4 mkIII extender with the 100-400 mkII and I keep it on most of the time, only removing it if a large subject gets too close. But I am using a 7DII. I am pleased with the results but think there would be a noticeable difference, for the better, on a higher mega pixel body. In fact the 100-400II and the 1.4III have almost become integrated.


Ray-P
When all else fails - Read the instructions!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
awacsCZE
Member
186 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jun 2014
     
Nov 03, 2019 05:54 |  #10717

markesc wrote in post #18953069 (external link)
There's a big jump in quality from the 70d to 80d (there may be some nice deals on these right now)... you could checkout the 90d forums if you have a bit more to spend.

I think for full frame, I hate to say it, but it just needs to be a 500F4 or bigger = $$$ just my opinion

Well, I would love to have better second body than 70D is, but currently need to stick with what I have :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
awacsCZE
Member
186 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jun 2014
     
Nov 03, 2019 05:58 |  #10718

Ray.Petri wrote in post #18954571 (external link)
Perhaps not directly answering your question but I use the 1.4 mkIII extender with the 100-400 mkII and I keep it on most of the time, only removing it if a large subject gets too close. But I am using a 7DII. I am pleased with the results but think there would be a noticeable difference, for the better, on a higher mega pixel body. In fact the 100-400II and the 1.4III have almost become integrated.

Thanks. I will probably try it, test it and return it, if it's not good enough.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ray.Petri
I’m full of useless facts
Avatar
6,572 posts
Gallery: 3138 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 24766
Joined Mar 2005
Location: North Kent UK
     
Nov 04, 2019 17:41 |  #10719

markesc wrote in post #18954667 (external link)

HOSTED PHOTO DISPLAY FAILED: ATTACH id 1008485 has been deleted. ]


HOSTED PHOTO DISPLAY FAILED: ATTACH id 1008486 has been deleted. ]

All good definition and sharp shots Mark. Well done!
What sort of snake is that in top shots?


Ray-P
When all else fails - Read the instructions!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ray.Petri
I’m full of useless facts
Avatar
6,572 posts
Gallery: 3138 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 24766
Joined Mar 2005
Location: North Kent UK
     
Nov 04, 2019 17:45 |  #10720

awacsCZE wrote in post #18954599 (external link)
Thanks. I will probably try it, test it and return it, if it's not good enough.

I very much doubt if you will want to return it once you have it.:-)


Ray-P
When all else fails - Read the instructions!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
markesc
Goldmember
3,613 posts
Gallery: 618 photos
Likes: 20443
Joined Feb 2014
     
Nov 04, 2019 20:44 |  #10721

Ray.Petri wrote in post #18955438 (external link)
All good definition and sharp shots Mark. Well done!
What sort of snake is that in top shots?

Thank you!

It's a " Common garter snake Thamnophis sirtalis"

https://myodfw.com …fe-viewing/species/snakes (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ray.Petri
I’m full of useless facts
Avatar
6,572 posts
Gallery: 3138 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 24766
Joined Mar 2005
Location: North Kent UK
     
Nov 05, 2019 01:24 |  #10722

markesc wrote in post #18955501 (external link)
Thank you!

It's a " Common garter snake Thamnophis sirtalis"

https://myodfw.com …fe-viewing/species/snakes (external link)

Garter snake! I wouldn't want it wrapped around my leg!-?


Ray-P
When all else fails - Read the instructions!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
markesc
Goldmember
3,613 posts
Gallery: 618 photos
Likes: 20443
Joined Feb 2014
     
Nov 07, 2019 08:36 |  #10723

Ray.Petri wrote in post #18955579 (external link)
Garter snake! I wouldn't want it wrapped around my leg!-?

Yeah they are fairly harmless and will take off... I did a few years ago do an iphone video of one and it attacked my phone (must have been an adult)... I found out later that while a bite wouldn't kill ya, it could still lead to a nasty infection and probably unending "this is not a bill" / co pay's and other waste of time bureaucracies of our current health "care" system. So I dropped the phone but still got a decent video kinda sorta...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lijoec
Goldmember
Avatar
1,975 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 12363
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Space Coast Fl
     
Nov 07, 2019 16:53 |  #10724

markesc wrote in post #18956593 (external link)

HOSTED PHOTO DISPLAY FAILED: ATTACH id 1009124 has been deleted. ]


HOSTED PHOTO DISPLAY FAILED: ATTACH id 1009125 has been deleted. ]

You have been doing fantastic work. Awesome new ones to boot!


Cheers,
JOE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
markesc
Goldmember
3,613 posts
Gallery: 618 photos
Likes: 20443
Joined Feb 2014
     
Nov 08, 2019 23:40 |  #10725

lijoec wrote in post #18956805 (external link)
You have been doing fantastic work. Awesome new ones to boot!

Well thank you!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,419,875 views & 40,661 likes for this thread, 481 members have posted to it and it is followed by 286 members.
EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM Review WOW!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1278 guests, 154 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.