Thank you for response.
I will certainly redo my calibration based on your suggestion.
Much appreciated.
David
Thank you for response.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnSheehy Goldmember 3,733 posts Likes: 737 Joined Jan 2010 More info | Feb 25, 2020 08:53 | #1562 DreDaze wrote in post #19015480  live view doesn't take into affect any focus mistakes...it uses a different type of AF, so it will always be right on...you need to adjust it through the viewfinder i think a quick easy test is a live view shot, and then a through the viewfinder shot...if they don't line up something is off There are lenses, though, that have slightly different focus distances wide open, vs stopped down for exposure. I wonder if there can still be problems with that in sensor AF.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 25, 2020 10:24 | #1563 DreDaze wrote in post #19015480 live view doesn't take into affect any focus mistakes...it uses a different type of AF, so it will always be right on...you need to adjust it through the viewfinder i think a quick easy test is a live view shot, and then a through the viewfinder shot...if they don't line up something is off You are correct that if the AF through the OVF is different than the AF in Live View, something is off, but what does the Live View add to the process of calibrating the OVF AF? If the OVF AF is not in focus, that is all you need to know that something is off. Unless you are suggesting the use of the Live View image to judge the sharpness of the OVF image. Perhaps some might find that helpful. I suspect that most know what sharp focus looks like. Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Archibald You must be quackers!  More info | Feb 25, 2020 10:35 | #1564 pknight wrote in post #19016122 You are correct that if the AF through the OVF is different than the AF in Live View, something is off, but what does the Live View add to the process of calibrating the OVF AF? If the OVF AF is not in focus, that is all you need to know that something is off. Unless you are suggesting the use of the Live View image to judge the sharpness of the OVF image. Perhaps some might find that helpful. I suspect that most know what sharp focus looks like. Put camera on tripod - focus on contrasty subject in good light using live view - then half-press the shutter button (or BBF). If the focus shifts, the viewfinder AF is not optimal. Canon R5, Canon 90D, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX10 IV
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid  More info | Feb 25, 2020 21:04 | #1565 pknight wrote in post #19016122 You are correct that if the AF through the OVF is different than the AF in Live View, something is off, but what does the Live View add to the process of calibrating the OVF AF? If the OVF AF is not in focus, that is all you need to know that something is off. Unless you are suggesting the use of the Live View image to judge the sharpness of the OVF image. Perhaps some might find that helpful. I suspect that most know what sharp focus looks like. i feel like something could not be in perfect focus and still appear sharp...with live view you know what the optimal sharpness would be Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid More info | Feb 25, 2020 21:50 | #1566  p-week8_20_0253bw by andre gregoire, on Flickr p-week8_20_0434 by andre gregoire, on FlickrAndre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Archibald You must be quackers! More info | Feb 25, 2020 21:52 | #1567 DreDaze wrote in post #19016499 p-week8_20_0253bw by andre gregoire, on Flickr p-week8_20_0434 by andre gregoire, on FlickrGreat shots! Canon R5, Canon 90D, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX10 IV
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid More info | Feb 25, 2020 23:16 | #1568 Archibald wrote in post #19016500 Great shots! And a B/W pic that to me looks to work better that way than in color.  thanks...there wasn't much color to it even in color Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 26, 2020 09:34 | #1569 Archibald wrote in post #19016136 Put camera on tripod - focus on contrasty subject in good light using live view - then half-press the shutter button (or BBF). If the focus shifts, the viewfinder AF is not optimal. Gotcha. Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
#1 is a stunner!! Well done! "His thoughts tumbled in his head, making and breaking alliances
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Archibald You must be quackers! More info Post edited over 1 year ago by Archibald. | Feb 27, 2020 21:01 | #1572 Roseate Spoonbill. (90D.) Canon R5, Canon 90D, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX10 IV
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 27, 2020 23:44 | #1573 Little Egret: 90D Sigma 150-600mm Contemporary, centre-weighted metering, still a soft image after first lens calibration, but work in progress:  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Tufted Duck: 90D Canon 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 is usm mkii spot metering, calibration and settings still need refining further, believe its still front focusing slightly, but getting there:  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Becoming happier with 90D as time goes by. Both images handheld.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Archibald You must be quackers! More info | Feb 27, 2020 23:52 | #1574 David_Wales wrote in post #19017809 Little Egret: 90D Sigma 150-600mm Contemporary, centre-weighted metering, still a soft image after first lens calibration, but work in progress: Hosted photo: posted by David_Wales in ./showthread.php?p=19017809&i=i79032402 forum: Canon EOS Digital Cameras Tufted Duck: 90D Canon 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 is usm mkii spot metering, calibration and settings still need refining further, believe its still front focusing slightly, but getting there: Hosted photo: posted by David_Wales in ./showthread.php?p=19017809&i=i17035180 forum: Canon EOS Digital Cameras Becoming happier with 90D as time goes by. Both images handheld. Looks like progress. It is a bit puzzling why the first is a bit soft. You had a great subject to focus on. Maybe try again when the light is brighter, and with a higher shutter speed. Canon R5, Canon 90D, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX10 IV
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Looks like the light and the moisture in the air were bouncing off of each other. Been there. Not much you can do.. "His thoughts tumbled in his head, making and breaking alliances
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is Brik 692 guests, 293 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
