Then what is the logic behind it being f1.8? Why not f2?
My logic of 1.8 is that it’s trying to maximize aperture while keeping size reasonable. I just don’t think 105mm f/1.4 is a reasonable size lens (relative to the fl). And, I’m just being mindful of Sony’s existing GM lenses. I can’t see them going 100mm f/2 when they already went f/1.8 at 135mm. I’m trying to be realistic in my wishes. But sure, I’d personally be even happier with a 100mm f/2.
I just now remembered that Nikon also made a 105 1.4, so I can see Sony going that way too...I just hope they don’t.
I do wonder what they’ll be up to next. Still got some prime holes to fill at 100 (or 105), 200, and 300.
Agree nevertheless. Just wait till I get my Sony phone/camera haha!




