
Some pics from the last week or two. Short Eared Owls from Nova Scotia, Canada.

./showthread.php?p=19156979&i=i67466746
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

./showthread.php?p=19156979&i=i58220481
forum: Canon Digital Cameras
Magnificent!
bwhip Senior Member ![]() 760 posts Likes: 2637 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Idaho, USA More info | Nov 24, 2020 18:20 | #1516 Sdentrem wrote in post #19156979 ![]() Some pics from the last week or two. Short Eared Owls from Nova Scotia, Canada. ![]() Hosted photo: posted by Sdentrem in ./showthread.php?p=19156979&i=i67466746 forum: Canon Digital Cameras ![]() Hosted photo: posted by Sdentrem in ./showthread.php?p=19156979&i=i58220481 forum: Canon Digital Cameras Magnificent!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SYS Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Nov 24, 2020 18:36 | #1517 Heavily cropped, not suitable for large printing, but quite adequate and enough details intact for the web..... Image hosted by forum (1074718) © SYS [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (1074719) © SYS [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
clipper_from_oz Goldmember ![]() More info | Nov 25, 2020 01:08 | #1518 local Eastern Rosella. Hopefully now restrictions have been lifted here I can go find some other variety of birds to shoot for a change Image hosted by forum (1074751) © clipper_from_oz [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Clipper
LOG IN TO REPLY |
avondale87 thanks for whoever started this ![]() More info | Nov 25, 2020 01:11 | #1519 clipper_from_oz wrote in post #19157203 ![]() local Eastern Rosella. Hopefully now restrictions have been lifted here I can go find some other variety of birds to shoot for a change ![]() Glad your restraints have been eased. Haven't tired of your variety though.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 25, 2020 01:21 | #1520 SYS wrote in post #19157115 ![]() Heavily cropped, not suitable for large printing, but quite adequate and enough details intact for the web..... ![]() Hosted photo: posted by SYS in ./showthread.php?p=19157115&i=i236215620 forum: Canon Digital Cameras ![]() Hosted photo: posted by SYS in ./showthread.php?p=19157115&i=i213487569 forum: Canon Digital Cameras Have you tried the 1.4 added to the 150-600 on the R5, if so, was AF as responsive, as if it was on natively?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
robamy Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Nov 25, 2020 04:30 | #1521 flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/robamyphotos/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
John Sheehy Goldmember 4,504 posts Likes: 1189 Joined Jan 2010 More info | Nov 25, 2020 04:43 | #1522 Bianchi wrote in post #19157206 ![]() Have you tried the 1.4 added to the 150-600 on the R5, if so, was AF as responsive, as if it was on natively? I don't have that lens, but with the Sigma 100-400/5-6.3, reporting TCs slow down AF significantly during those long-haul large changes in focus distance, contrasted to my 400/4DO II, which doesn't seem to slow down much at all with either a Kenko Pro 300 DG 1.4, or the Canon 2xIII. Before I updated the Sigma firmware a couple of weeks ago, I could use it with a Tamron 2x with taped pins (I am not inclined to put tape on the 2xIII), and it AFed pretty fast, but was more prone to go off focus after initially locking on, but refocused pretty fast. I think that 1.4x worth of non-reporting can help the speed without the side effect, but 2x is a bit much for 99%-lockon. The EF TC protocol is a pain in the butt. You should be able to have a TC that reports EXIF correctly, even stacked with other TCs, and have options to vary the speed regulator to match your system and your needs. The R5 and R6 open up TC AF opportunities quite a bit, at the level of potential, but that potential is very difficult to realize with the antiquated protocol, which assumes lame/dead DSLR AF with higher f-numbers (at least for EF lenses and TCs - I don't know the TC communication situation with RF lenses).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
John Sheehy Goldmember 4,504 posts Likes: 1189 Joined Jan 2010 More info | Nov 25, 2020 06:41 | #1523 I, John Sheehy wrote in post #19157266 ![]() The EF TC protocol is a pain in the butt. You should be able to have a TC that reports EXIF correctly, even stacked with other TCs, and have options to vary the speed regulator to match your system and your needs. Another problem with TCs that are not seen by the system is that IBIS assumes the reported focal length, and does not correct sufficiently. The nice thing about in-lens IS is that it does not care about correction in terms of millimeters on the sensor; it just stabilizes its own analog projection, with no need to know if that projection passes through any other optics.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SYS Cream of the Crop ![]() More info Post edited over 2 years ago by SYS. | Nov 25, 2020 06:51 | #1524 Bianchi wrote in post #19157206 ![]() Have you tried the 1.4 added to the 150-600 on the R5, if so, was AF as responsive, as if it was on natively? No, I have not and very likely to hold off on the idea until I get a good prime. A thread on this topic:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
umphotography grabbing their Johnson ![]() More info | Nov 25, 2020 08:47 | #1526 SYS wrote in post #19157115 ![]() Heavily cropped, not suitable for large printing, but quite adequate and enough details intact for the web..... ![]() Hosted photo: posted by SYS in ./showthread.php?p=19157115&i=i236215620 forum: Canon Digital Cameras ![]() Hosted photo: posted by SYS in ./showthread.php?p=19157115&i=i213487569 forum: Canon Digital Cameras
Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SYS Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Nov 25, 2020 09:17 | #1527 umphotography wrote in post #19157347 ![]() This is a decent crop. How big is that cropped file ?? Could you make a 16x24 print with it ?? The cropped dimension is 2506 x 1760 and 5.90mp jpeg.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 25, 2020 09:27 | #1528 Gambel's Quail... Image hosted by forum (1074818) © Tom in Arizona [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. “The sound of birds stops the noise in my mind.” - Carly Simon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kd_reno Goldmember More info | Nov 25, 2020 09:45 | #1529 Bianchi wrote in post #19157206 ![]() Have you tried the 1.4 added to the 150-600 on the R5, if so, was AF as responsive, as if it was on natively? I've tried it with the EF 1.4III. I find the lens a little slower to acquire focus than the EF100-400, with or without the t/c. Sharp enough when it works. Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chuckmiller Goldmember ![]() More info | Nov 25, 2020 18:11 | #1530 I think this is excellent urban photography. Maybe cropped a tad too tight? .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is ChipsNChips 491 guests, 142 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |