I have the Yongnuo twin flash YN24EX and I wondered if the Raynox 250 would attach to the unit?
Paul.
PaulIddon Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 22, 2021 04:33 | #1 I have the Yongnuo twin flash YN24EX and I wondered if the Raynox 250 would attach to the unit? My site: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info Post edited over 2 years ago by Wilt. | Mar 22, 2021 16:56 | #2 A Raynox 250 attaches to the lens, like a filter....it is a 'closeup filter' I seen no correlation between using 'a lens filter' and using it with a twin flash unit. You are changing what the lens sees, not changing what the flash illuminated. You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks Wilt. My site: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Mar 22, 2021 18:05 | #4 I see you have a 70D...I see no point in using an optically degrading close up lens rather than putting your existing lens on an extension tube. What (how big) is what you intend to shoot, so I have an idea of the macro magnification you need to achieve? You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
It would be for Collembolla and such. Most of mine I have to crop to get a bit of decent size. My site: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info Post edited over 2 years ago by Wilt. | Mar 22, 2021 19:14 | #6 Paul Iddon wrote in post #19212418 It would be for Collembolla and such. Most of mine I have to crop to get a bit of decent size. Paul. Animals under 1mm in size, in a 15x22.5mm frame area...definitely macro territory. Getting the animal to be 5mm on sensor is needing 5x magnification out of a lens. Canon does have a lens to do that, but it is unlikely that you could stack 5*FL amount of extension tubes to get 5x results on sensor with a lens you own already! You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 22, 2021 19:22 | #7 I have the Venus 2:1 macro - and that is difficult on critters < 2mm but it's an enjoyable challenge. My site: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Just realize it's going to become even more challenging at 2.5x compared to 2x You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 22, 2021 22:29 | #9 I've heard many good things about the Raynox, as well as seen some nice shots. It's just not for me, just one more piece of glass. My 100mm + full set of extensions tubes has given me great results, & that's with some cropping. It gives me about the same mag as your Laowa. Your 70d would give a little more "reach" than my 6D. I began playing with a 4x microscope objective & attachments with great results, & cheaper than the Raynox. This might be a little further than you want to go, all kinds of reflecting light & stuff. I was just about to get into flocking around the shiny things when I decided to start shooting film & turned my small work area into a negative viewing/scanning work station.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 22, 2021 22:34 | #10 Ok, I see the issue now. I thought you had the flash with the heads separated from the lens. The Raynox does measure by filter size but it's a variable size because it's a clip-on filter, not a screw on type. Due to the shape of it I'm doubtful you can use it with that particular flash.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 22, 2021 22:52 | #11 I don't have an answer for whether the Raynox will fit with your twin flash. I just wanted to mention that the reduction in image quality from using the Raynox filter is negligible. I've been using it for a while now and have been very happy with it. I would not consider it optically degrading. Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/thomasbarbin/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 23, 2021 05:36 | #12 Wilt wrote in post #19212450 Just realize it's going to become even more challenging at 2.5x compared to 2x The Raynox assumes the front thread on the lens is 49mm...what does your lens have?! 62mm. My site: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 23, 2021 05:38 | #13 I think if I get one - it will have to be used with just natural light and not the flash. My site: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
That is one solution, here is another.... I rigged this together for more flexibility with my Bolt flash. Can you remove the flash heads from the mount?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PaulIddon THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop More info Post edited over 2 years ago by Paul Iddon. (3 edits in all) | Mar 23, 2021 07:57 | #15 Pigpen101 wrote in post #19212570 That is one solution, here is another.... I rigged this together for more flexibility with my Bolt flash. Can you remove the flash heads from the mount? https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php?t=1517912 I have the flash heads on these bought off Ebay, mounted above the lens behind my diffuser - so they do similar to your rigging to a degree: Image hosted by forum (1094319) © Paul Iddon [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. My site: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1056 guests, 128 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||