Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 26 Feb 2022 (Saturday) 20:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Need help with a new 90D

 
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5572
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Mar 01, 2022 10:40 |  #16

ttownvstrom wrote in post #19350220 (external link)
I will give it a try.

If you need some tips for it, feel free to reach out and ask. It can be a little unclear as to what you're looking for/at as you make adjustments.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ttownvstrom
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
99 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
     
Mar 01, 2022 12:32 |  #17

I'm going to give it a try after work today.


Canon 7D2, Canon 100-400mmV2, Tamron 60mm macro, Tamron 10-24mm and Canon 500mm F4 V1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ttownvstrom
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
99 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
     
Mar 09, 2022 11:13 |  #18

Just to finish this off. I took identical shots on a tripod with the 90D and my 7D2. The 7D2 were much sharper. I went out and took around 100 shots of Gulls flying with both cameras and the same lens. The 90D had zero sharp photos, must were not even close. My 7D2 had about 95 percent sharp. This was not a hard shot for the auto focus. Large Gulls (Ringbilled) flying slowly back and forth in front of me in good light. I called Canon and they wanted me to end it in and let them try to fix it. I said no, I want to exchange it for another Refurbished 90D but they didn't have anymore. So I returned it for a refund. I'm thinking about buying a new one but now I'm gun shy.


Canon 7D2, Canon 100-400mmV2, Tamron 60mm macro, Tamron 10-24mm and Canon 500mm F4 V1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Mar 09, 2022 18:41 |  #19

Not sure why you would be gun shy, just one bad body doesn't make the entire model line bad. So many people have praised the 90D and the results they get, with threads dedicated to that 90D. I would suggest not being too worried and try again in the future.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RodneyCyr
Senior Member
683 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 146
Joined Feb 2005
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Mar 09, 2022 19:27 |  #20

TeamSpeed wrote in post #19353717 (external link)
Not sure why you would be gun shy, just one bad body doesn't make the entire model line bad. So many people have praised the 90D and the results they get, with threads dedicated to that 90D. I would suggest not being too worried and try again in the future.

I agree with TeamSpeed. I don't think that an improperly refurbished 90D should deter you from getting a new one.


Canon 80D, 60D, Canon 10-22EFs, 15-85EFS IS, Sigma 100-400, Sigma 135/1.8ART, Sigma 30mm f/1.4DC, Canon 60mm EFs Macro, Rokinon 8mm fisheye, 550EX flash, Olympus TG6 underwater P&S
Postprocessing: DxOLabs 5, DxO Viewpoint 3, Paint Shop Pro 2021
Speak softly and carry a big zoom.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,504 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 50960
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
Post edited over 1 year ago by Archibald.
     
Mar 09, 2022 21:51 |  #21

ttownvstrom wrote in post #19353571 (external link)
... I called Canon and they wanted me to end it....

OK, that seemed pretty drastic when I first read it.

Did you do micro focus adjust on the 90D/500mm combo?


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDWP
Goldmember
Avatar
2,889 posts
Gallery: 583 photos
Likes: 6718
Joined Jun 2020
Location: Newfoundland & Labrador, Canada
     
Mar 09, 2022 22:51 |  #22

Does sound like one bad apple. I'm curious to see a couple of test shots from the 90D though vs the 7Dii ... ?


... and, from the good old days, Canon F-1n, FTb, Mamiya 645 (m1000s), etc. -- Rob

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ttownvstrom
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
99 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
     
Mar 10, 2022 13:20 |  #23

I deleted all the 90D photos off my computer. I couldn't stand to look at them, they were bad. I know that it had to be a bad camera, but they were so bad, especially the birds in flight shots and that's my favorite thing I do. The still shots I took were a little off, but the birds in flight were way way off. Like unrecognizable Blobs bad and I thought the AF in the 90D maybe was vastly inferior to my 7D2. When I think about it can't be. I had a T1i and a T2i and a 7D before and they all took good flight shots, so the AF in the 90D must as good or better than those. I probably will buy a new one.


Canon 7D2, Canon 100-400mmV2, Tamron 60mm macro, Tamron 10-24mm and Canon 500mm F4 V1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lowrider
Goldmember
Avatar
1,043 posts
Likes: 284
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Tucson
     
Mar 10, 2022 14:21 |  #24

Just throwing this out, If you are doing BIF shots, you may want to look at one off the new mirrorless canon's. Some of the posts I'm seeing on this forum are amazing IMHO.

Lou




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ttownvstrom
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
99 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
     
Mar 10, 2022 14:45 |  #25

I don't know how well my lens 100-400 mm v2 and 500mm v1 would work with them.


Canon 7D2, Canon 100-400mmV2, Tamron 60mm macro, Tamron 10-24mm and Canon 500mm F4 V1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Mar 10, 2022 14:47 |  #26

You never really got into your settings with the 90D. If your birds were blobs, then it likely wasn't an issue with the camera, but rather settings. I have never heard of any Canon camera being that bad. What AF mode (spot, single point, zone?) and AI servo?


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ttownvstrom
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
99 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
     
Mar 10, 2022 15:07 |  #27

I was using zone ,AI servo, 1/2500 shutter speed. Same as I was doing on my 7D2 and those were sharp.


Canon 7D2, Canon 100-400mmV2, Tamron 60mm macro, Tamron 10-24mm and Canon 500mm F4 V1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pippan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,362 posts
Gallery: 1218 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 32706
Joined Oct 2015
Location: Darwin, Straya
     
Mar 10, 2022 15:18 |  #28

ttownvstrom wrote in post #19353995 (external link)
I was using zone ,AI servo, 1/2500 shutter speed. Same as I was doing on my 7D2 and those were sharp.

I use a 90D and get a lot of very sharp BIF photos with the 100-400LII. I'd suggest you look at your AF tracking settings. There are several options that can greatly impact on how well the camera can grab and hold focus.


Still waiting for the wisdom they promised would be worth getting old for.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ttownvstrom
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
99 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
     
Mar 10, 2022 15:34 |  #29

I tried several different settings. I changed most of them, I can't remember the exact settings but I several different ways. I had the camera set so a red square showed on the focus point. Most times it was right on the bird but completely out of focus when I looked at them. I'm not saying it wasn't user error but I've managed to get sharp BIF shots with several different cameras for the last 12+ years.


Canon 7D2, Canon 100-400mmV2, Tamron 60mm macro, Tamron 10-24mm and Canon 500mm F4 V1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Mar 10, 2022 16:34 |  #30

ttownvstrom wrote in post #19353995 (external link)
I was using zone ,AI servo, 1/2500 shutter speed. Same as I was doing on my 7D2 and those were sharp.

It sounds like if you didn't have birds that were at least very well defined as a bird but not super crisp in detail, then the zone AF wasn't working as intended or needed adjustments in the AF settings under the covers. There are 3 such settings for AI Servo AF that have to be managed (under the Case settings). You cannot use the same case setting either from one model to another, they don't work interchangeably.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,819 views & 7 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it and it is followed by 10 members.
Need help with a new 90D
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
642 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.