duckster wrote in post #19365533
So, used this lens for more than 1/2 of the shots from the track meet yesterday. It really does seem to give a "pop" to the images. The AF is fast. Maybe not as fast as the EF 100-400L II that I was also shooting but pretty fast and accurate. The FPS were fine on the 7DII but would be slowed down on the R6. The top image is from the EF 200 f2.8 and bottom from the 100-400. Both JPEG images with a little cropping. Is the EF 135L f2 even better? I don't know as I have never shot with that lens. I was impressed with how compact the 200 f2.8 is while being somewhat heavy for it's size.
So, used this lens for more than 1/2 of the shots from the track meet yesterday. It really does seem to give a "pop" to the images. The AF is fast. Maybe not as fast as the EF 100-400L II that I was also shooting but pretty fast and accurate. The FPS were fine on the 7DII but would be slowed down on the R6. The top image is from the EF 200 f2.8 and bottom from the 100-400. Both JPEG images with a little cropping. Is the EF 135L f2 even better? I don't know as I have never shot with that lens. I was impressed with how compact the 200 f2.8 is while being somewhat heavy for it's size.
Hosted photo: posted by duckster in
./showthread.php?p=19365533&i=i123425560
forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive
./showthread.php?p=19365533&i=i123425560
forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive
Hosted photo: posted by duckster in
./showthread.php?p=19365533&i=i85570135
forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive
./showthread.php?p=19365533&i=i85570135
forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive
Excellent shots, when I shot exclusively with Canon equipment the 200 f2.8 was a lens I always wanted but never was able to acquire for one reason or another.
