Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 10 May 2022 (Tuesday) 02:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Broom plants - what went wrong

 
davholla
Goldmember
2,090 posts
Gallery: 458 photos
Likes: 2590
Joined Nov 2014
     
May 10, 2022 02:27 |  #1

What went wrong with these? I had autofocus on - and considering the Canon 90 can easily auto focus on birds it should be ok with stationary plants.
However it doesn't look quite goodright, I had aperture f 10

IMAGE: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52061489243_fe9519fa54_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2nju​JXv  (external link) IMG_0130_Broom (external link) by davholla2002 (external link), on Flickr


And

IMAGE: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52061939445_5fd8b87e53_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2njx​3MB  (external link) IMG_0120_Bromley_Broom (external link) by davholla2002 (external link), on Flickr



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lyn2011
Goldmember
1,135 posts
Gallery: 361 photos
Likes: 2456
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Australia
     
May 10, 2022 06:01 |  #2

From my experience the autofocus didn't work properly in the first photo, because there was not enough contrast (too much green). The second photo is much better. A landscape photo is maybe better with Manual focus. And I've the 60mm macro lens too and find out that it is not really suited for landscapes.
But these are my experiences, maybe others have an idea too.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dasmith232
Senior Member
Avatar
682 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 381
Joined Nov 2012
Location: Monument, CO, USA
Post edited over 1 year ago by dasmith232.
     
May 10, 2022 06:55 |  #3

What auto focus *points* did you have enabled? Using one of the "zone" options (vs using a single point) can yield different results. My experience is that it's usually not that auto focus didn't work, but it didn't focus on the thing that I wanted.

With Canon, the auto point selection will look for a blend of high contrast and close-ness. The over hanging leaves at the top of the frame (for example) would be a good candidate for the camera to choose.


Dave
Mostly using Canon bodies with lots of different lenses and flash.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davholla
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,090 posts
Gallery: 458 photos
Likes: 2590
Joined Nov 2014
     
May 10, 2022 07:55 |  #4

dasmith232 wrote in post #19376474 (external link)
What auto focus *points* did you have enabled? Using one of the "zone" options (vs using a single point) can yield different results. My experience is that it's usually not that auto focus didn't work, but it didn't focus on the thing that I wanted.

With Canon, the auto point selection will look for a blend of high contrast and close-ness. The over hanging leaves at the top of the frame (for example) would be a good candidate for the camera to choose.

I had the zone enabled see

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2022/05/2/LQ_1158216.jpg
Image hosted by forum (1158216) © davholla [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davholla
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,090 posts
Gallery: 458 photos
Likes: 2590
Joined Nov 2014
     
May 10, 2022 07:59 |  #5

Lyn2011 wrote in post #19376460 (external link)
From my experience the autofocus didn't work properly in the first photo, because there was not enough contrast (too much green). The second photo is much better. A landscape photo is maybe better with Manual focus. And I've the 60mm macro lens too and find out that it is not really suited for landscapes.
But these are my experiences, maybe others have an idea too.

Thanks for that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,707 posts
Likes: 4030
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
May 10, 2022 08:26 |  #6

It's hard to tell without seeing the originals or at least, 100% crops of the subject area, but they don't look all that bad. A lot depends on what you were trying to achieve. If you want it to pop a bit, you can do so in post by bumping up the saturation, contrast, then apply some sharpening.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,807 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16147
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
May 10, 2022 09:10 |  #7

Besides the important points that Lyn2011 listed, f/100 or 125 is often too slow for clarity. Tripod, monopod, braced, or handheld? And if it was windy, foliage was moving around. And broom plants are so spread out that they're basically hemispherical, meaning that different areas of the visible surface will be various distances from you.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa | Comments welcome

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5572
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
May 10, 2022 13:00 |  #8

More important that the AF points chosen is whether or not you're using One Shot or Servo. For static subjects, One Shot is going to be your most accurate because it "locks" the focus point and stops hunting/checking once focus is acquired. Servo just sort of pauses, but continues to jockey the lens group looking for corrections; this can cause missed focus fairly easily in static subjects and is exacerbated by the lack of contrast noted above and your distance. OhLook's comment on wind can also make this worse; as it really doesn't take much of a breeze at ALL for something as fine of detail as Scotch Broom to show motion blur at all from it.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,807 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16147
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
May 10, 2022 15:26 |  #9

Snydremark wrote in post #19376589 (external link)
OhLook's comment on wind can also make this worse

Oh, dear. All too often, my comments have that effect.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa | Comments welcome

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5572
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
May 10, 2022 17:50 |  #10

OhLook wrote in post #19376628 (external link)
Oh, dear. All too often, my comments have that effect.

Hahahaha


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,416 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4502
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 1 year ago by Wilt. (2 edits in all)
     
May 11, 2022 13:12 |  #11

davholla wrote in post #19376500 (external link)
I had the zone enabled see

Hosted photo: posted by davholla in
./showthread.php?p=193​76500&i=i86136988
forum: Nature & Landscapes

I don't know if this has at all changed over the years, but the AF Point display shows only WHICH of the AF points were used for determination of focus, but it does NOT show what point(s) in the scene actually were the ones that were located at the AF point at time of focus.
That is, if I select the right focus point to use for focus which is located on the letter X of 'School Xing' sign, but after I focus I then re-frame so that the entire sign is located at the left half of the frame, the right AF point will be displayed red but it could be superimposed over nothing in the photo (because the sign is at the left of the photo)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AntonLargiader
Goldmember
Avatar
3,084 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 397
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Charlottesville, VA
     
May 15, 2022 18:34 |  #12

I *think* you don't see any red boxes in that case. I do a fair amount of BBF and recompose for sports and I have plenty of pics with no red boxes because AF was not active at that time.


Image editing and C&C always OK
Gear list plus: EF 1.4X II . TT1/TT5 . Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 w/3265 ball-mount

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,311 views & 10 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
Broom plants - what went wrong
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1322 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.