-= Canon EOS R7 owners unite! Post photos and discuss.

Jeff USN Photog 72-76 wrote in post #19398405
DIF - ducks in flight

Hosted photo: posted by Jeff USN Photog 72-76 in
./showthread.php?p=193​98405&i=i212441001
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

Hosted photo: posted by Jeff USN Photog 72-76 in
./showthread.php?p=193​98405&i=i182123726
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

What is with those lines under their bellies. May be motion blur and sharpening artifacts as a result?

smugmug

Loving the R7!

RF 100-400mm with 1.4x TC

Sony α7 / ILCE-7 • Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM @300mm • 1/640 • f/11 • ISO 400

Photo from LoneRider's gallery.
Image hosted by forum (1166284)

Wayne...
IF METADATA SAYS “SONY A7” - IT WAS SHOT WITH EOS R7!
~I don't suffer from gear ADD, I embrace and enjoy it...~
Canon EOS R5, R6, R7, and a bunch of glass...

rndman wrote in post #19398409
What is with those lines under their bellies. May be motion blur and sharpening artifacts as a result?

Looks like bad processing. There also seems to be way too much noise
for those ISO levels.

Wild Birds of Europe: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=19371752
Please QUOTE the comment to which you are responding!

Levina de Ruijter wrote in post #19398420
Looks like bad processing. There also seems to be way too much noise
for those ISO levels.

I think bad processing, doing too many things at once also with my "new" eyes, post cataract, it can be hard to see the screen. I will have to redo them and see what I get

"sometimes having is not so pleasing as wanting, it is not logical but it is true" Commander Spock
"Free advice is seldom cheap" Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #59
I might not always be right, but I am never wrong! Once I thought I was wrong but I was mistaken!

ok let's try another one.

The R7 locked right on the dragonfly at about 30 yards with the RF600

1/1600 • f/11 • ISO 640

Image hosted by forum (1166293) © Jeff USN Photog 72-76 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

"sometimes having is not so pleasing as wanting, it is not logical but it is true" Commander Spock
"Free advice is seldom cheap" Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #59
I might not always be right, but I am never wrong! Once I thought I was wrong but I was mistaken!

Nearby GBH rookery

Sony α7 / ILCE-7 • Canon RF 800mm f/11 IS STM @800mm • 1/3200 • f/11 • ISO 3200

Photo from LoneRider's gallery.
Image hosted by forum (1166294)

Wayne...
IF METADATA SAYS “SONY A7” - IT WAS SHOT WITH EOS R7!
~I don't suffer from gear ADD, I embrace and enjoy it...~
Canon EOS R5, R6, R7, and a bunch of glass...

Levina de Ruijter wrote in post #19398420
Looks like bad processing. There also seems to be way too much noise
for those ISO levels.

tried it again, all it did was lighten it and there is a halo around the ducks the original is a blown exposure, I was trying to make a silk purse out of a sous ear!

here is the original, for some reason in Windows photo viewer of the raw image it brightens it right up and makes it look ok, tried it in LR no go. Will try PS

1/1250 • f/6.3 • ISO 100

Image hosted by forum (1166297) © Jeff USN Photog 72-76 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

"sometimes having is not so pleasing as wanting, it is not logical but it is true" Commander Spock
"Free advice is seldom cheap" Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #59
I might not always be right, but I am never wrong! Once I thought I was wrong but I was mistaken!

Jeff USN Photog 72-76 wrote in post #19398448
tried it again, all it did was lighten it and there is a halo around the ducks the original is a blown exposure, I was trying to make a silk purse out of a sous ear!

here is the original, for some reason in Windows photo viewer of the raw image it brightens it right up and makes it look ok, tried it in LR no go. Will try PS

Hosted photo: posted by Jeff USN Photog 72-76 in
./showthread.php?p=193​98448&i=i184455202
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

That’s what it looked like. I think I read somewhere that the camera is only ISO variant from about ISO800. If that is true then shooting @ISO100 and adding so much light in post would explain the noise.

Wild Birds of Europe: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=19371752
Please QUOTE the comment to which you are responding!

Levina de Ruijter wrote in post #19398456
That’s what it looked like. I think I read somewhere that the camera is only ISO variant from about ISO800. If that is true then shooting @ISO100 and adding so much light in post would explain the noise.

the mallards jumped up and scooted so fast I didn't have time to change ISO or EV, some days are like that

"sometimes having is not so pleasing as wanting, it is not logical but it is true" Commander Spock
"Free advice is seldom cheap" Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #59
I might not always be right, but I am never wrong! Once I thought I was wrong but I was mistaken!

LoneRider wrote in post #19398440
Nearby GBH rookery

Gallery photo (hosted):
posted by LoneRider originally in forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive

How about "That don't impress me much" for a title.

Charles
www.CScott4.com | Instagram | Facebook | Gear | Image Editing OK and critique welcome.

Jeff USN Photog 72-76 wrote in post #19398352
SIGMA 150-600C ISO 12,800

Taken in my side yard yesterday. Pulled CRaw into LR and ran it in AI Denoise, Auto (severe noise slider), In LR adjusted colors a bit but no other work on them

Hosted photo: posted by Jeff USN Photog 72-76 in
./showthread.php?p=193​98352&i=i107265754
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

Hosted photo: posted by Jeff USN Photog 72-76 in
./showthread.php?p=193​98352&i=i218080934
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

That 6400 looks great. How did the AF play with the R7

Mike
www.umphotography.com
GEAR LIST
Facebook

umphotography wrote in post #19398493
That 6400 looks great. How did the AF play with the R7

It isn't as fast as the Canon lenses. I had it on the bird and once it locked on it stayed on, but once out of 4 times in my hitting the AF again it missed. Also in trying to track birds it would miss sometimes but that is likely me as I had trouble or to say I couldn't keep the bird in the frame especially at 600mm

"sometimes having is not so pleasing as wanting, it is not logical but it is true" Commander Spock
"Free advice is seldom cheap" Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #59
I might not always be right, but I am never wrong! Once I thought I was wrong but I was mistaken!

Jeff USN Photog 72-76 wrote in post #19398435
ok let's try another one.

The R7 locked right on the dragonfly at about 30 yards with the RF600

Hosted photo: posted by Jeff USN Photog 72-76 in
./showthread.php?p=193​98435&i=i253745952
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

No way you're going back to your 90D right?

EOS R5 | EOS R7 | iPhone 12 Pro
• • •
RF 100-500mm | RF 100-400mm | RF 800mm F11 | RF 600mm F11
RF 24-240mm | RF 50mm 1.8 | RF 35mm 1.8 Macro | RF 16mm 2.8
flickr