-= Canon EOS R7 owners unite! Post photos and discuss.

Two more. AF was faster and more consistent with birds on the water.

This Owl has been visiting the neighbor's roof on occasion. I had to get on a ladder and shoot through some branches to get the roof as a background and avoid the overcast sky.

This morning I rolled over 10,000 shots on my R7.

Jeff USN Photog 72-76 wrote in post #19413539
This morning I rolled over 10,000 shots on my R7.

How many of those were mechanical shutter? Will it last until the Mark II comes out?

kd_reno wrote in post #19413426
A couple with the Tampon 18-400. My wife uses it with a 77D when we travel since it's light and she doesn't have to bother with changing lenses. She has trouble getting AF points on the subject, so I was hoping the R7 would be a a good replacement. The Tamron is not a bad little lens, but it doesn't seem to play all that well with the R7. AF is somewhat hit and miss when using subject tracking, but generally seems fine using single-point without tracking. But a couple of times it acted very erratically when I put it on after using an RF lens. I had to pull the battery after which it settled down. Maybe there is a n update for the lens firmware, but I'll need to get a dock.

First one is a 22MP crop and the second is 11.2MP

Hosted photo: posted by kd_reno in
./showthread.php?p=194​13426&i=i71681981
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

Hosted photo: posted by kd_reno in
./showthread.php?p=194​13426&i=i27672135
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

Hilarious typo!!!!

Two Honey Bee shots with the EF100/2.8. First one is uncropped, 2nd is 23.1MP. Handheld, no flash.

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2nD1​EaF

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2nD9​8Hk

edmidlifecrisis wrote in post #19413575
Hilarious typo!!!!

Damned autocorrect. But it's good to know someone's actually paying attention

Good for you. Getting lots of use from it and really nice pictures too!

JackCharlton wrote in post #19413590
Good for you. Getting lots of use from it and really nice pictures too!

I'm glad someone can tolerate this hot weather in the NE US. It depletes my enthusiasm for anything but air conditioning. Things should get a lot better starting Friday, though, and the birds should start moving, too, with northerly winds.

mcoren wrote in post #19413566
How many of those were mechanical shutter? Will it last until the Mark II comes out?

Virtually all were mechanical. I use ES with burst mode and have done about 100 bursts. Since I do BIF I don't like the rolling shutter I get on the wings or even on buildings as I am panning quickly

Hummer
R7

R7 Burst
RF 18-150 @ 150

After a recent visit to Lesser florican and Green Munia bird.. got some beautiful clicks of the bird with New R7 & Canon 100 - 400 IS ii lens. I am here posting one of Green Munia's male photos. The bird was sitting on a rock and the light was low due to monsoon weather at the Mt. Abu location. I clicked all photos in CR3 and almost no lag or buffer issues during the tour. Eye tracking is ultimate and sticky. But if the bird is very far then eye tracking is not that up to the mark. but overall good experience. I was worried about ISO performance but yet I am happy with it. till 3200 noise is easily manageable in 3rd party noise-removing software. I had 7d mark ii, 80d, and 90d in past and I must say it a definitely a good upgrade from it. Yes but don't compare R7 with full frame hence crop and full frame both have their advantages and disadvantages. In fact, also used it with 1.4 extender mark iii and it didn't cause any eye tracking issues and the focus speed was almost the same will share other photos as time permits. Here this image is cropped and post-processed in LR & Topaz denoise.

Exif - SS 1/640s, F6.3, ISO 1000

priyankdhami wrote in post #19413822
After a recent visit to Lesser florican and Green Munia bird.. got some beautiful clicks of the bird with New R7 & Canon 100 - 400 IS ii lens. I am here posting one of Green Munia's male photos. The bird was sitting on a rock and the light was low due to monsoon weather at the Mt. Abu location. I clicked all photos in CR3 and almost no lag or buffer issues during the tour. Eye tracking is ultimate and sticky. But if the bird is very far then eye tracking is not that up to the mark. but overall good experience. I was worried about ISO performance but yet I am happy with it. till 3200 noise is easily manageable in 3rd party noise-removing software. I had 7d mark ii, 80d, and 90d in past and I must say it a definitely a good upgrade from it. Yes but don't compare R7 with full frame hence crop and full frame both have their advantages and disadvantages. In fact, also used it with 1.4 extender mark iii and it didn't cause any eye tracking issues and the focus speed was almost the same will share other photos as time permits. Here this image is cropped and post-processed in LR & Topaz denoise.

Exif - SS 1/640s, F6.3, ISO 1000

Hosted photo: posted by priyankdhami in
./showthread.php?p=194​13822&i=i213977153
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

Beautiful photo, so detailed!