Image hosted by forum (1185810) © atxannie [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
atxannie Senior Member  More info | Nov 16, 2022 21:44 | #61 Image hosted by forum (1185810) © atxannie [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 27, 2022 15:59 | #62 this little fella was by the pool n holiday last week  Image hosted by forum (1187175) © dibley [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 27, 2022 16:09 | #63 He has a steady hand. .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Inspeqtor I was hit more than 15 times  More info | Nov 27, 2022 16:10 | #64 I am not sure what it is, but somehow the lens on that camera does not look very real.....?!?! Charles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 27, 2022 16:18 | #65  Image hosted by forum (1187177) © mike_d [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 27, 2022 16:49 | #66 Inspeqtor wrote in post #19450785  I am not sure what it is, but somehow the lens on that camera does not look very real.....?!?! its not real its a figure of a photographer that was in the kids pool...thats not a real monkey on his back either
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Inspeqtor I was hit more than 15 times More info | Nov 27, 2022 21:42 | #67 mike_d wrote in post #19450787 Oh cool beans! She is learning to use her camera very well!!! Proper hand holding!! Charles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Inspeqtor I was hit more than 15 times More info | Nov 27, 2022 21:44 | #68 dibley wrote in post #19450794 Inspeqtor wrote in post #19450785 I am not sure what it is, but somehow the lens on that camera does not look very real.....?!?! its not real its a figure of a photographer that was in the kids pool...thats not a real monkey on his back either I really did know all that, I was just having phun with ya!! Charles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
atxannie Senior Member More info | Dec 11, 2022 22:16 | #69  Image hosted by forum (1188908) © atxannie [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomReichner "That's what I do."  17,607 posts Gallery: 213 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 8338 Joined Dec 2008 Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot More info | Dec 14, 2022 22:42 | #70 .  Image hosted by forum (1189367) © Tom Reichner [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. . "Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 15, 2022 16:46 | #71 Are 2 of them using a 600mm lens? .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 16, 2022 06:50 | #72 Tom Reichner wrote in post #19428584 . My buddy looking for a clear shooting lane when we were photographing deer in Colorado a few years back. . Unfortunately, he never found a nice clear shot at the buck, as the forest was a bit too thick. EDIT: I have a question for y'all ..... In my opinion, this is a MUCH better photo because the tree blocks a clear view of my friend and obscures most of his body. . If that tree were not there, and I could see all of him clearly, then the pic would not be nearly as cool looking or nearly as interesting. Do you agree? . Or do some of you think that it would be a better pic if the entirety of my friend were shown clearly, without the obstructing tree trunk? . Completely agree... obviously you were "stalking" and the partially blicked image brings this out. Happy Shooting - Jamey
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Greg_8 Senior Member  706 posts Gallery: 33 photos Likes: 344 Joined Nov 2006 Location: Michigan, Northern Lower & Eastern Upper More info | Dec 16, 2022 13:57 | #73 Tom Reichner wrote in post #19428584 . My buddy looking for a clear shooting lane when we were photographing deer in Colorado a few years back. . Unfortunately, he never found a nice clear shot at the buck, as the forest was a bit too thick. EDIT: I have a question for y'all ..... In my opinion, this is a MUCH better photo because the tree blocks a clear view of my friend and obscures most of his body. . If that tree were not there, and I could see all of him clearly, then the pic would not be nearly as cool looking or nearly as interesting. Do you agree? . Or do some of you think that it would be a better pic if the entirety of my friend were shown clearly, without the obstructing tree trunk? .
Keep 'em flying,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomReichner "That's what I do." 17,607 posts Gallery: 213 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 8338 Joined Dec 2008 Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot More info | Dec 17, 2022 10:40 | #74 . "Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 18, 2022 23:16 | #75 Tom Reichner wrote in post #19457188 Amazing to me how many people have $13,000 to spend on a single lens... I hear ya. Even if a person makes money from their photos it seems to me it would take a long time to recoup that expense. .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1452 guests, 111 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
