BadaDUMP
Nick5 Goldmember More info | BadaDUMP Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nick5 Goldmember More info Post edited 10 months ago by Nick5. | Still using a pair of 5D Mark III’s. Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Dec 09, 2022 10:39 | #33 It's hard to go wrong with the 5D4. If you are like me, you will be pretty amazed at the upgrade vs. 5D3. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 "spouting off stupid things" 57,707 posts Likes: 4030 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Dec 09, 2022 10:46 | #34 CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #19454605 It's hard to go wrong with the 5D4. If you are like me, you will be pretty amazed at the upgrade vs. 5D3. I went from the 5DII to the 5DIV and the 5DIV pretty much addressed everything I needed. It's a near perfect camera for me. Now, if there was some way I could get a 5DIV coupled with a 150-600 lens shrunk down to something that can be carried in a pocket.. Perfection. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 09, 2022 11:03 | #35 gjl711 wrote in post #19454611 I went from the 5DII to the 5DIV and the 5DIV pretty much addressed everything I needed. It's a near perfect camera for me. Now, if there was some way I could get a 5DIV coupled with a 150-600 lens shrunk down to something that can be carried in a pocket.. Perfection. ![]() My upgrade route was 450D, 5D, 7D, 5D3, 5D4, and now the R5. The 5D4 was enough camera for my needs, but active face-tracking through the viewfinder and finally being able to ditch the AFMA shenanigans made the move to mirrorless a no-brainer for me. With the impending closure of the POTN Forum, please consider joining the POTN "Alumni" Facebook group
LOG IN TO REPLY |
downhillonwater Senior Member More info Post edited 7 months ago by downhillonwater. | Dec 26, 2022 09:32 | #36 Given the R6II announcement and significantly improved software on the R6II/R7, it's reasonable we will get an R5II soon. Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/downhillonwater/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Archibald You must be quackers! More info Post edited 7 months ago by Archibald. | Dec 26, 2022 09:52 | #37 All I need is a firmware update for my R5 so it behaves more like Canon's recent models. Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
LOG IN TO REPLY |
downhillonwater Senior Member More info Post edited 9 months ago by downhillonwater. | First I've heard about R5 FW 1.8. Thanks for letting us know. Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/downhillonwater/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Assumer Member 190 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Arkansas More info | Mar 11, 2023 20:59 | #39 I’m wanting to jump into mirrorless and can’t decide if I should wait or just get the current R5. Don’t have to get one but would be fun.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
umphotography grabbing their Johnson More info | Mar 13, 2023 10:02 | #40 It lost me at 61MPs Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Assumer Member 190 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Arkansas More info | Mar 14, 2023 07:37 | #41 umphotography wrote in post #19492535 It lost me at 61MPs get one and then you have to go out and buy a Mac Pro computer because thats what you will need to process the images True. I just purchased a 5. Decided I couldn’t wait.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mcluckie I play with fire, run with scissors and skate on thin ice all at once! 2,192 posts Gallery: 109 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 449 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Hong Kong, Ozarks, previously Chicago area More info | Mar 16, 2023 04:51 | #42 MMp wrote in post #19451189 My knee-jerk response to these leaked/rumored specs is relief that I'm not seeing an obvious need to upgrade from the current R5. It feels like they are trying to match up with Sony for megapixels and also aiming to add to their market share of videographers with via boosting video capabilities. Coming from someone who uses their camera for about 90% photo / 10% video, this all looks rather "meh" to me. ![]() Canon EOS R5 Mark II Specifications (Rumored)
https://www.canonrumors.com …ii-coming-in-q2-2023-cr2/ Meh for me too multidisciplinary visual guy, professor of visual art, irresponsible and salty.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mcluckie I play with fire, run with scissors and skate on thin ice all at once! 2,192 posts Gallery: 109 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 449 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Hong Kong, Ozarks, previously Chicago area More info | Mar 16, 2023 04:54 | #43 MMp wrote in post #19451452 I agree 100%. It's nice to be able to use the cheap and reliable SD cards. For important events, it's cheaper and best practice to use several smaller cards rather than putting all your eggs in one basket with a large card. If I'm not mistaken, the main reason for the initial move to the CF Express B cards was to provide sufficient write speeds to record 4k+ video. Again, with the addition of dual CF Express slots, I think Canon is targeting the videographer population as they may want the redundancy of simultaneously recording video to both cards. I had a shitton of CF cards and was pissed enough to just be living happily with SDs. This is a no-go for me. Maybe they could make a camera just for photoguys some day again. multidisciplinary visual guy, professor of visual art, irresponsible and salty.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mcluckie I play with fire, run with scissors and skate on thin ice all at once! 2,192 posts Gallery: 109 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 449 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Hong Kong, Ozarks, previously Chicago area More info | Mar 16, 2023 04:56 | #44 Coimbra wrote in post #19452232 Would be nice if the price of the R5 came down then. I'm selling mine to get less invested in Canon. Lenses have always sucked, RF lenses are only "good" with digital correction (but still soul-less)— I'll minimize my Canon reliance and go elsewhere. multidisciplinary visual guy, professor of visual art, irresponsible and salty.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AeroSmith Goldmember More info | May 08, 2023 16:05 | #45 Nick5 wrote in post #19454519 Still using a pair of 5D Mark III’s. They’re tanks. I may purchase a pair of 5D Mark IVs as it’s the end of the line for the DSLR. Why purchase…… built like tanks… They work. Then I can make the jump to Mirrorless. Just thinking out loud… I keep straying from the 5d4 only to keep coming back. I may buy a second. Josh Smith
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1320 guests, 135 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||