-= 90D owners unite! Discuss and Post Photos

Chris L F wrote in post #19471524

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2oda​dyo IMG_1369 by Hinkleigh, on Flickr

Phenomenal detail.

Thanks, yes, not too bad considering it was shot through double glazing that could do with a clean!

I bought the 90D to upgrade my 80D (which replaced a 650D which didn't do the 100 - 400 justice) as I do quite a bit of bird photography. The 80D is used now as my walkabout camera and for landscapes but I suppose I should use the 90D for the latter as well.

Chris

Another moon pic with the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM + 1.4x TC. This was handheld in our front yard, a testament to the IS of this lens as I have essential tremors so my hands are not real steady.

sparksdjs wrote in post #19473349
Another moon pic with the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM + 1.4x TC. This was handheld in our front yard, a testament to the IS of this lens as I have essential tremors so my hands are not real steady.

Hosted photo: posted by sparksdjs in
./showthread.php?p=194​73349&i=i56927563
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

Excellent photography!!

sparksdjs wrote in post #19473349
Another moon pic with the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM + 1.4x TC. This was handheld in our front yard, a testament to the IS of this lens as I have essential tremors so my hands are not real steady.

Hosted photo: posted by sparksdjs in
./showthread.php?p=194​73349&i=i56927563
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

If you have a stability problem, then perhaps for still subjects like the moon it might be advantageous for you to use a series of shorter exposures and stack them in software that aligns the images before combining them.

I,John Sheehy wrote in post #19473408
If you have a stability problem, then perhaps for still subjects like the moon it might be advantageous for you to use a series of shorter exposures and stack them in software that aligns the images before combining them.

With the 90D, you are probably looking through the viewfinder and are using a fast-rolling mechanical shutter, which is good. In live view or with mirror-less cameras, full e-shutter should be avoided for stacking because it can capture frames that have horizontal shearing, and vertical compression and expansion that makes simple alignment impossible, with such a high magnification, especially if you have tremors.

Inspeqtor wrote in post #19473403
Excellent photography!!

Thank you for the compliment!

I've always felt i shouldn't mess with removing things from photos when processing but the bathroom building in this photo was ruining the wildness of it I felt. We will see who all can pick it out, I'm sorta happy with the results ha.

Not nearly as good as a stacked image, but I'm pretty happy with it for a single exposure.

Image hosted by forum (1196627) © hobs1466 THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Yesterday morning while waiting for better light at dawn to go birding. Prospect Park, Wheatridge, Colorado USA.

Yesterday at Prospect Park, Wheatridge, Colorado USA.

[QUOTE=gewb;19479772]Y​esterday morning while waiting for better light at dawn to go birding. Prospect Park, Wheatridge, Colorado USA.

Hosted photo: posted by gewb in
./showthread.php?p=194​79772&i=i111938870
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

Thank you!

Took this pic this AM a little over a mile from our house. At one point, there were four Bald Eagles flying around.