Just went to see a rugby match under floodlights with my EOS 350d and kit lens, and with it "zoomed in" at the 55mm end of the lens, on ISO 800 and with a large aperture I was still barely able to get a workable 1/20 or 1/30 shutter speed. Photos still came out rather blurred and horribly grainy
Now, there were a few pro photographers there - slightly closer to the action, but with proper, long lenses. The long lenses mean they'd be even worse off for light, right? So how on earth could they be managing to get any decent photos at all?
I'm still new to this photography lark, I'm not entirely sure what I'm going on about. But I don't see how they could work when I was having enough trouble with a relatively wide lens.