TheChemist wrote in post #3083048
The problem is that a. e-mails have already been sent to the parents of the players, so advertising would be largely useless and I feel that my photos are good enough to warrant payment
That's not a problem. Stop thinking like it is a problem. It's absolutely, 100% okay to decide that you prefer not to give away the fruits of your labors for anything other than actual money.
Politely explain that you prefer not trading your photos for advertising space. If you'd be willing to accept some sort of financial deal based on the number of books sold, or something like that, go ahead and explain to the potential purchaser what you have in mind.
this parent is good friends with my mother.
Then you'd think she'd want to treat you - her friend's child - fairly and in a financially reasonable manner, right?
What does your mother's friend (or the friend's spouse) do for a living? Any possibility of a barter arrangement?
"You want to use my photos for free? Sure, I guess that's okay. Oh, by the way, I understand that your husband's a dentist; I need some work done on my teeth. You're my mom's friend, so it'll be a freebie, right? 'Cause I'm not willing to spend any money on this. I mean, I could provide your husband with some good advertising by telling people who fixed my teeth, but I wouldn't be, you know, like paying him."
Hey, if it's fair to give away your professional services on such a basis, how is it unfair when the situation's reversed?
I never cease to be amazed at how willing some (mostly inexperienced) photographers are to give away their work. How some of them actually seem ashamed to ask for payment.
There's nothing inherently wrong about giving away your work for free, in a good cause. But in the 99.9% of situations where the person who wants your work for free isn't going to be using it to help starving children in Ethiopia or some similarly noble cause, there's nothing at all shameful about you wanting to be paid for your photos.