Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
Thread started 05 May 2007 (Saturday) 11:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

f/stops, stops, light stops, etc..

 
jcospolich
Member
71 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Breckenridge
     
May 05, 2007 11:43 |  #1

is there a linear correlation b/w stops of light, regardless of if you're adjusting ISO, f, shutter?

In other words, just talking about brightness (and not clarity, quality, sharpness)....
will each of the below brighten the image similarly (+ 2 stops of light)?
- ISO 100 to 400
- slowing shutter speed from 1/125 to 1/30
- opening aperture from F8 to F4

So taking an exposure at 1/60 f11 would be allowing the same amount of light on the sensor/film as 1/250 f5.6?

This site has always been helpful-
http://www.photonhead.​com/simcam/ (external link)

as has this one-
http://www.uscoles.com​/fstop.htm (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
jcospolich
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
71 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Breckenridge
     
May 05, 2007 12:18 |  #2

i am slowly beginning to understand how intertwined the settings are, and how one certainly affects the other.

for my interior flash photography, I have been struggling with finding the right settings for a nicely lit picture.

I have toyed around with the following:
- P mode, ISO 200, cloudy WB, FEC +2/3, EC +2/3, auto everyting else. camera usu chooses f4.0-4.5, 1/60
- M mode, ISO 400, cloudy WB, FEC +1, EC +1/3, f5.6-6.3, 1/125-1/200
- Av mode, ISO 200-400, cloudy WB, FEC +1, EC +2/3, f9-10, 1/13

for minimal post processing, usu the P shots, and sometimes the Av shots are okay. M shots still leave a lot to be desired. I know I can play with WB a lot more, but I think that is a subject for me to tackle after I fig out exposure better.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Digger
Senior Member
Avatar
574 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: In front of the computer in New York, Duh.
     
May 05, 2007 13:15 |  #3

you have the concept and are correct in your conversions. at this point its practice and feel. dont worry you will get the hang of it. since your using flash and in control of the light i would drop your asa some more. i personally like to use as low of an ISO that i can, less grain/noise


email: tricksvo@gmail.com (external link)
www.rickodellphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
12345Michael54321
Senior Member
559 posts
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Baltimore County, Maryland, USA
     
May 05, 2007 13:51 |  #4

jcospolich wrote in post #3156041 (external link)
just talking about brightness (and not clarity, quality, sharpness)....
will each of the below brighten the image similarly (+ 2 stops of light)?
- ISO 100 to 400
- slowing shutter speed from 1/125 to 1/30
- opening aperture from F8 to F4

Yup. Each of the examples you offer represents a change of 2 stops.

Just in case you were wondering, that's 4 times the light. Since a 1 stop change equals twice the light. (Or half the light, if you're moving in the other direction.)

So taking an exposure at 1/60 f11 would be allowing the same amount of light on the sensor/film as 1/250 f5.6?

Yes. Those are equivalent exposures.

Of course, depth of field would differ from f/11 to f/5.6, so the picture might look somewhat different (or maybe not - if everything in the picture is very distant, depth of field considerations can pretty much become irrelevant). But if all you're talking about is exposure, they're the same.

Give yourself a pat on the back for understanding this. It's a fundamental concept, but one of which most people are utterly oblivious.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcospolich
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
71 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Breckenridge
     
May 05, 2007 16:13 |  #5

thanks it is starting to make sense. I usu prefer low ISOs, but since most of my paid workends up compressed as heck on MLS and prop websites, I don't see much of a difference with ISO200 or 800.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Moderator
Avatar
75,353 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2173
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
May 05, 2007 20:41 |  #6

for my interior flash photography, I have been struggling with finding the right settings for a nicely lit picture.

This might help:
Fill light at sunset
Here's something that will help you figure light fall-off in your head.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,362 views & 0 likes for this thread
f/stops, stops, light stops, etc..
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is illidan2000
497 guests, 299 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.