blam wrote in post #3153654
oh snap.....
oh snap.....
Damnnn!
JaGWiRE Goldmember 3,859 posts Joined Sep 2006 More info | May 05, 2007 19:06 | #2506 blam wrote in post #3153654 oh snap..... Damnnn! Canon EOS 30D, Sigma 30 1.4, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 105 Macro, 135L, 430ex, Lowepro Mini Trekker AW, Manfrotto 3001pro w/486rc2 and 804rc2 head, Manfrotto 681 w/ 3232 head.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
divinemethod Senior Member  536 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | May 05, 2007 19:41 | #2507 nothing like the 85 L, but here's something i just snapped from a very scattered andbusy tree.
~Siva
LOG IN TO REPLY |
driverdave Member 37 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Colorado More info | 50mm f1.8  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. http://www.evsdesigns.com/photos/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Amichore Member  45 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Philly PA More info | I've been experimenting with my EF 50 1.4 USM that I recently purchased and must confess I think it has issues. It's not quite as sharp as I expected. I'm not sure if I am just paranoid or whether I need to send it back. The Bokeh is dreamy but in the focal range it seems lacking in sharpness. But hey, I'm an ameture!  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. EOS 5D / 5QD(A2E Film)/50D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdos2 Member 158 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Shaker Heights, Ohio More info | May 06, 2007 22:54 | #2510 It certainly doesn't appear sharp in that picture. Does it have a plane of sharp focus at all? Very pretty background. Sharp or not, it's pretty.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
busterboy Goldmember  1,436 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: Yorkshire Born n Bred. More info |
[COLOR=blue][COLOR=black][COLOR=blue]| Canon 1DMkIII | 16-35mm f/2.8L | Canon 70-200mm F/2.8L IS | Canon 1.4X Extender | Canon 2X Extender |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
malla1962 Cream of the Crop  7,714 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2004 Location: Walney Island,cumbria,uk More info |
Amichore Member 45 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Philly PA More info | May 07, 2007 10:38 | #2513 jdos2 wrote in post #3163207 It certainly doesn't appear sharp in that picture. Does it have a plane of sharp focus at all? Very pretty background. Sharp or not, it's pretty. Good question. I think I am going to try shooting some 2D test patterns. At least then I will know if I am on plane or not. Thanks for the comment. I do like the way the flowers in the backround look. EOS 5D / 5QD(A2E Film)/50D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kster Senior Member  551 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: California, USA More info | May 07, 2007 13:00 | #2514 Also posted in another thread:
1DmkIII and some lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 07, 2007 18:03 | #2515 What lens is this with? And any Exif data you have. 7D MKII ■ 10-22 ■ 15-85 ■ 28-135 ■ Σ 50-150 ■ 70-200 f4L ■ 100-400L ■ 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
willowdawn Member  116 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: Fredericksburg, VA More info | May 08, 2007 13:25 | #2516 Ok,  85mm f/5.6  50mm f/3.2   And if you would be so kind as to explain why it is good or bad, I would be eternally grateful! Canon 20d
LOG IN TO REPLY |
In2Photos Cream of the Crop  19,813 posts Likes: 6 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Near Charlotte, NC. More info | May 08, 2007 13:32 | #2517 willowdawn wrote in post #3172470 Ok, So I've read many threads and more pages of this thread than I should admit to... and I'm still confused! Is this good... or bad, bokeh? And if you would be so kind as to explain why it is good or bad, I would be eternally grateful! I don't really like this guy but his article on Bokeh isn't bad. Worth a read and will answer your questions. Mike, The Keeper of the Archive
LOG IN TO REPLY |
willowdawn Member 116 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: Fredericksburg, VA More info | May 08, 2007 13:40 | #2518 Mike, Canon 20d
LOG IN TO REPLY |
In2Photos Cream of the Crop 19,813 posts Likes: 6 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Near Charlotte, NC. More info | May 08, 2007 14:20 | #2519 willowdawn wrote in post #3172559 Mike, Thanks for the read. After reading, and looking again, I'm going to say that it is pretty good bokeh. I'm not seeing sharp edges, but there is definitely identifable spherical shapes. But then again, I could be sooooo wrong! It isn't the worst I have ever seen. Mike, The Keeper of the Archive
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gsgary Goldmember 1,283 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Chesterfield,UK More info | 300F2.8L @ 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 491 guests, 196 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
There are a few highlights in each of the first three photos that have some sharp edges. These shots are pretty small and harder to tell. If you look at the original at 100% magnification it might be easier to discern. All in all though they don't seem to take away anything in the image which is a good thing.