
Now that's an intelligent comment that adds insight into your intellect.
sure thing gearhead..now let's see some of your images.
glowie Senior Member ![]() 888 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: NYC More info | Dec 24, 2007 16:56 | #76 Hogloff wrote in post #4563541 ![]() Now that's an intelligent comment that adds insight into your intellect. sure thing gearhead..now let's see some of your images. .....::....:..:..:::.::....:::..::....:.:.:::....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bill Boehme Enjoy being spanked ![]() More info | Dec 24, 2007 17:42 | #77 MaDProFF wrote in post #4561999 ![]() ..... I am looking into FF next year, and if you work it out Dollar for Dollar and IQ ETC. the Nikon D3 for the UWA FF use looks pretty appealing ........ Then there is no problem -- buy the one that is the most appealing to you. After all, it is only a tool ........ isn't it? Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
datadump Goldmember ![]() 1,932 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: Canada More info | Dec 24, 2007 17:49 | #78 neither canon nor nikon help pay for my/your mortgage.. so stop worrying about them. datadump
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jwreich Senior Member ![]() 440 posts Joined May 2005 More info | Dec 24, 2007 22:24 | #79 WGK wrote in post #4561829 ![]() I'm tired of buying Canon cameras and having the error code 99. I used Nikons in the past and converted to Canon about three years ago but I'm becoming frustrated with customer support and error code 99. I just don't get it, I've shoot canon for years. I change glass often and have NEVER had an er 99 on either the 20d, 30D, 40D, 5d, 1dMKII, 1dMKIIN, or 1dMKIII.... --JWR
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thatkatmat Cream of the Crop ![]() 9,342 posts Gallery: 41 photos Likes: 205 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Seattle, don't move here, it's wet and cold More info | Dec 24, 2007 22:57 | #80 Me either, guess I've neen lucky, think I'm on my 5th body. Canon, Nikon, whatever. we get so caught up in it, not saying it isn't easy to, if you let it. I'm really happy with Canon. everything I've purchased, new and used, has been really really great. I just bought my 3rd copy of the 24-70 (this time I'm keeping it) and I expect that it will be just as good as the other two I bought. My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wtaccord Senior Member ![]() 705 posts Joined May 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Dec 25, 2007 01:33 | #81 I've had 3 Canon DSLR's and about a dozen lenses with absolutely no problems at all. No "soft coppies" that everyone grips about. I did get one err99 on my Digital Rebel but that wasnt the Canon's fault. I had bought a Sigma 135-400mm and it was a known issue with the Sigma lens. Sent the lens in for a chip update and all is well. I'm not a brand basher and I think people should shoot with whatever they are comfortable with. The new Nikon bodies look like they have some awesome features. Does that mean I'm gona switch? No. I'm happy with Canon and I feel they have better glass but that's only my opinion. Canon isnt the first company to rush new product to market to beat the compitition and then have to remediate it and they wont be the last. It's just how the game is played. Canon 1D Mark II | 7D | 30D | 17-55 f2.8 IS | 35mm f1.4L | 50mm f1.4 | 100mm f2.8 Macro | 135mm f2L | 70-200mm f2.8L IS | 300mm f2.8L IS | 300mm f4L IS | 400mm f5.6L | Canon 1.4X & 2X | Canon 580EXII/580EX/420EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joegolf68 Goldmember 3,269 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Sacramento CA area More info | Dec 25, 2007 01:38 | #82 Canon and Nikon will fight it out. Right now, I think Nikon will take the lead due to Canon's mishandling of the Mark III. Not the error or AF, but the lack of customer support and closed mouths. If not for R Galbraith, we would still be shooting OOF and being blamed by Chuck Westfall for our poor cfn settings. They need to do better soon or lose their pro edge. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AdamLewis Goldmember ![]() 4,122 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Seattle, WA More info | Dec 25, 2007 02:05 | #83 Yeah. Canon is probably going belly up after Jan 1. I should sell all my stuff..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GORDO Senior Member 336 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Calgary,Ab,Canada More info | Dec 25, 2007 03:24 | #84 Lets go back in time.Take away the LCD screen,auto focus and everything else that makes it easier to take pictures.It worked for years and now with all this technology,some people are just not happy.For Petes sake.Ansel adams was happy with a view camera manual this and that.Aint technology a great thing?Fire away lads(and lassies).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blonde Buck Naked Floozies ![]() 8,405 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Boston, MA More info | Dec 25, 2007 05:15 | #85 GORDO wrote in post #4565728 ![]() Lets go back in time.Take away the LCD screen,auto focus and everything else that makes it easier to take pictures.It worked for years and now with all this technology,some people are just not happy.For Petes sake.Ansel adams was happy with a view camera manual this and that.Aint technology a great thing?Fire away lads(and lassies). i don't know about you but i have no problem admitting that i am not Ansel Adams... i don't shoot what he did, i don't compose like he did and i don't look like he did.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Vincent Vega Member 70 posts Joined May 2007 Location: UK More info | Dec 25, 2007 07:13 | #86 Sure, the new Nikons are nice, but I just don't care. I'm quite happy with my 30D and the rest of my Canon stuff. For me, Canon has great lenses and bodies, and the fact that company X sells stuff that may or may not be better is immaterial to me. I'm overjoyed with the body and glass I've got and the fact that there's a Nixon at the top of the tree changes nothing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Keith R Goldmember 2,856 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England More info | Dec 25, 2007 08:40 | #87 blonde wrote in post #4565852 ![]() i don't know about you but i have no problem admitting that i am not Ansel Adams... i don't shoot what he did, i don't compose like he did and i don't look like he did. Indeedy - can't remember ever seeing any Adams Bird In Flight shots that really impressed me...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Keith R Goldmember 2,856 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England More info | Dec 25, 2007 08:41 | #88 Re: error 99 - anyone who thinks Nikon will be your saviour might want to Google Nikon CHA...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Keith R Goldmember 2,856 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England More info | Dec 25, 2007 08:43 | #89 ed rader wrote in post #4562175 ![]() canon knew beforehand that the camera had problems Any proof of that, Ed?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hogloff Cream of the Crop 7,606 posts Likes: 416 Joined Apr 2003 Location: British Columbia More info | Dec 25, 2007 08:51 | #90 ![]() Keith R wrote in post #4566215 ![]() Any proof of that, Ed? Yes, in April the model they sent to Rob G. had focus problems and they admitted that and indicated the production models would be corrected. They just did not mention that it would take them almost 1 year to correct the problems while still selling a knowling defective camera. This is one case where competition has hurt the consumer. I believe Canon knew all along they had a problem and they also knew Nikon was coming out with their new D300 and D3 models so it forced Canon to release the MKIII before they really wanted to.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is Vinz_Evo 500 guests, 175 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |