Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
POTN forums are closing 31.12.2023. Please see https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1530921 and other posts in that thread for details.
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
Thread started 01 Feb 2008 (Friday) 11:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What do you think will be the next great leap in photography technology?

 
roli_bark
Senior Member
Avatar
918 posts
Joined Oct 2005
     
Feb 01, 2008 12:24 |  #16

Post-shot Focus adjustment.

Chuck Westfall had mentioned this innovative technology which Canon is working on since 2 years ago !




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonnythan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,003 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Upstate NY
     
Feb 01, 2008 12:26 |  #17

HDR doesn't really expand the range of the sensor. It compresses a wide range of exposure data. I dunno if/when we'll ever see that in a camera.


T2i | 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS | 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS | 50mm f/1.8 II | 430ex
Flickr
 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,744 posts
Likes: 4074
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Feb 01, 2008 12:53 |  #18

It's interesting how many want bigger and bigger. Am I the only one looking to get smaller. I hate, absolutely hate, dragging around huge heavy bags. It is so old school and I have been doing it for 30 years and am tired of it. I would rather see the noise problem solved completly so that we can have 1DsMkIII technology in a package that will fit in a pocket. Don't give me bigger sensors, give me smaller sensors that have the characteristics of bigger ones.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
danpass
Goldmember
Avatar
2,134 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Naples, FL
     
Feb 01, 2008 13:07 |  #19

gjl711 wrote in post #4830425 (external link)
Maybe it's time for these bio-chips to take off. Motorola has their new display based on bio-technology. Maybe they could turn that around and make a sensor that works like the human eye further upping the pixel count and resolving power and reducing the noise.

Bio-nueral circuitry.







oh, wait, that's 24th century technology on the USS Voyager.
:p

.


Dan
Gallery (external link) | Gear/Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Matthew ­ Hicks ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
2,552 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
     
Feb 01, 2008 14:51 |  #20

danpass wrote in post #4830733 (external link)
Bio-nueral circuitry.







oh, wait, that's 24th century technology on the USS Voyager.
:p

.

Ya beat me to it, yew arse!


Calgary Wedding Photography by Matthew Hicks: www.matthicksphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
prime80
Goldmember
Avatar
2,394 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 83
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Harmony, FL
     
Feb 01, 2008 17:07 |  #21

One thing I forgot to add was the hope that either a new shutter design or a move to an electronic shutter allows for significantly higher flash sync speeds. I see no reason why we shouldn't expect at least 1/1000s sync speed.


John
R6, EF 100-400 L IS II, EF 24-70 L II, EF 85 f/1.8
Full Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
danpass
Goldmember
Avatar
2,134 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Naples, FL
     
Feb 02, 2008 09:10 |  #22

Trainboy wrote in post #4831293 (external link)
Ya beat me to it, yew arse!

Temporal Prime Directive!


.


Dan
Gallery (external link) | Gear/Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EspenW
Junior Member
28 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Oslo
     
Feb 05, 2008 17:16 |  #23

gjl711 wrote in post #4830648 (external link)
It's interesting how many want bigger and bigger. Am I the only one looking to get smaller. I hate, absolutely hate, dragging around huge heavy bags. It is so old school and I have been doing it for 30 years and am tired of it. I would rather see the noise problem solved completly so that we can have 1DsMkIII technology in a package that will fit in a pocket. Don't give me bigger sensors, give me smaller sensors that have the characteristics of bigger ones.


Exactly!


e




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Matthew ­ Hicks ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
2,552 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
     
Feb 05, 2008 19:15 |  #24

In-camera HDR?
http://www.news.com …bj=news&tag=254​7-1_3-0-20 (external link)


Calgary Wedding Photography by Matthew Hicks: www.matthicksphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bad ­ karma
Senior Member
Avatar
730 posts
Joined Aug 2005
     
Feb 06, 2008 00:22 as a reply to  @ Matthew Hicks Photography's post |  #25

Entry level SLR's handling ISO 1600 like ISO 100

*dreams*


Website: http://www.solsticeret​ouch.com (external link)
Contact: ratik@solsticeretouch.​com (external link)
Retouching classes: http://www.retouchingc​lasses.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
I ­ Simonius
Weather Sealed Photographer
Avatar
6,508 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 49
Joined Feb 2005
Location: On a Small Blue Planet with Small Blue People With Small Blue Eyes
     
Feb 10, 2008 16:47 |  #26

irishman wrote in post #4830077 (external link)
I've got to believe that it can't be too much longer before we see in-camera HDR imaging. Your thoughts?

Gotta be DR. (HDR by another name)
The resolution has gone far enough (21MP is enough IMO) we don't want ot have to do HDR we want really cool wide DR (and 16bit obviously) but there you are I think the next big leap wil, be in DR


Veni, Vidi, Snappi
Website  (external link) My Gear ---- (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gpx4
Senior Member
Avatar
257 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Feb 16, 2008 21:52 |  #27

Auto composition!

The camera rotates 360 degrees to correct your composition.


Canon EOS 5D | 40D | BG-E4 | BG-E2 | Nikon D300 | MD10 |
Canon EF 16-35L II F/2.8 | EF 50 F/1.4 | EF 24-105L IS | EF 135L F/2.0 | EF 70-200L F/4 IS | EF 100-400L IS | Nikkor 70-200 F/2.8VR | Tamron 17-50 F/2.8
580EXII X 2 | | SB-800 |Zenitar 16mm F/2.8 FE| Kenko ExT| Kenko 1.4X TC| Sigma 500 Super DG| OCS-2 | Cactus Radio trigger & wireless remote

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,744 posts
Likes: 4074
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Feb 16, 2008 22:20 |  #28

I Simonius wrote in post #4890800 (external link)
Gotta be DR. (HDR by another name)...

HDR really isn't a big step forward. I mean it's here today. Adding a few more bits in really isn't a major advancement.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
I ­ Simonius
Weather Sealed Photographer
Avatar
6,508 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 49
Joined Feb 2005
Location: On a Small Blue Planet with Small Blue People With Small Blue Eyes
     
Feb 17, 2008 03:27 |  #29

gjl711 wrote in post #4932399 (external link)
HDR really isn't a big step forward. I mean it's here today. Adding a few more bits in really isn't a major advancement.

If a sensor could encompass a wider DR , say 20 stops, I reckon that's a major advancemnet!


Veni, Vidi, Snappi
Website  (external link) My Gear ---- (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
_aravena
isn't this answer a stickie yet?
Avatar
12,458 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Back in the 757
     
Feb 17, 2008 19:21 |  #30

Any one see that lens thing with Adobe. Bug eye lens effect where you can blur what you want, focus what you want, move images around, etc.


Last Shot Photography
My Site (external link) ~ Gear List ~ Bag Reviews

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

41,759 views & 1 like for this thread, 82 members have posted to it and it is followed by 8 members.
What do you think will be the next great leap in photography technology?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
3562 guests, 118 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.