Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 11 Mar 2008 (Tuesday) 23:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro

 
TripleOne
Member
35 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Mar 11, 2008 23:01 |  #1

I already have the 50 1.8. Now considering of either disposing the 1.8 and get the 1.4 or keep the 1.8 and get the 60 macro. What i'm looking for in those 2 lenses are sharpness and bokeh. With my 50 1.8, sometimes i get very nice pics but sometimes not, especially in low light.

Both the 1.4 and Macro will be used mainly as potrait lens but i also want to do some close up/macro like flowers and other tiny subject but not insects (the too close working distance for the 60 2.8 doesnt bother me)

Anybody got sample pics of 50 1.4 @ 2.8 vs the EFS 60 @ 2.8? I want to compare the sharpness and which one got creamier bokeh?

I prefer those 50/60 mm focal length, so the 85 1.8 or Tamron SP90/EF100mm macro are out of question




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
TripleOne
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
35 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Mar 13, 2008 01:51 |  #2

???Anyone?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
silvex
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,303 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 35
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Southern California, USA
     
Mar 13, 2008 02:02 |  #3

I would then get the EF-S 60 due to your interest in macro. It is one of canon's sharpest lens.


.
-Ed
CPS Platinum Member.
Canon Gear
SilvexPhoto.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TripleOne
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
35 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Mar 13, 2008 10:24 |  #4

silvex wrote in post #5105662 (external link)
I would then get the EF-S 60 due to your interest in macro. It is one of canon's sharpest lens.

Thanks, anymore input from others?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Mar 13, 2008 10:30 |  #5

50 1.4@2.8 is marginally sharper than 60 @2.8 . the best thing you can do is keep the 50 and buy the 50, and then take a screwdriver to the 1.8 version. you switch the mount around and then you have a fully functional super macro lens. i've seen the instructions posted in a really old thread, so it's doable.


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sfordphoto
Goldmember
2,564 posts
Joined Feb 2008
     
Mar 13, 2008 13:49 |  #6

If you're going to do macro work, no question, get the 60mm


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
n1as
Goldmember
2,327 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Salem, OR
     
Mar 13, 2008 16:29 as a reply to  @ Sfordphoto's post |  #7

I have both. I've shot comparison shots and the 60 is very sharp wide open. I'm on the wrong computer right now so I can't look at the photos so I'll do this from memory.

At distances below 20 feet or so, the 60 is noticeably sharper than the 50 at apertures of f/4 and faster. At long (landscape) distances the 50 is equal to the 60 but you have to be stopped down to 5.6 to see it.

So, for sharpness, the 60 beats the 50 at wide apertures.

Focus speed of the 60 is pretty fast. I shot a basketball game with it and it focused as fast and accurate as the 50 does. Pretty impressive for a "macro".

I was --> <-- this close to selling the 50 f/1.4 and just using the 60 but the shallow DOF of the 50 gives it a capability that the 60 can't match.

My 50 is currently at Canon to address front focus and softness wide open. We'll see how it does when I get it back. When I did my focus tests, I was using manual focus in live view (40D) since I knew the 50 was front focusing a bit.


- Keith
http://darwinphoto.zen​folio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
silvex
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,303 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 35
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Southern California, USA
     
Mar 16, 2008 17:45 |  #8

Try this 50f1.4 vs 60f/2.8 macro

http://the-digital-picture.com …&SampleComp=0&F​LI=0&API=2 (external link)


.
-Ed
CPS Platinum Member.
Canon Gear
SilvexPhoto.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sebr
Goldmember
Avatar
4,628 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Sweden/France
     
Mar 16, 2008 19:04 |  #9

I have never owned the 60 macro, but the 50/1.4 is my most used lens. I was also hesitating between the 50 and the 60, but was convinced to get the 50 on this forum and I am glad I got the 50.
The wider max. aperture of the 50 makes a huge difference in terms of light and bokeh, and as a result the 50 is a much better portraits. It does not offer 1:1 magnification, but it works well for flowers.


Sebastien
5D mkIII ; 17-40L ; 24-105L ; 70-200L II ; 70-300L ; 35L ; Σ85/1.4 ; 135L ; 100macro ; Kenko 1.4x ; 2x mkIII ; 580EXII
M5 ; M1 ; 11-22 ; 18-150 ; 22/2.0 ; EF adapter; Manfrotto LED
Benron Tripod; ThinkTank, Lowepro and Crumpler bags; Fjällräven backpack

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
therealmr
Senior Member
519 posts
Joined Feb 2008
     
Mar 16, 2008 19:17 |  #10

The bokeh of the 50 f/1.4 at f/2.2, coupled with sharpness is amazing. Since you're going to be using it for portraits - you won't be dissappointed

Sorry to say I don't have a comparison between it and the 60mm macro.


http://www.simkinsphot​ography.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EcoRick
Goldmember
1,863 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Mar 16, 2008 22:02 as a reply to  @ therealmr's post |  #11

I have both lenses. I suggest you get the 60 2.8 since you already have the 50mm range covered. They're both great lenses, however the macro feature of the 60mm makes it a fun lens.


Gear: Canon 1Ds MkII, 35L, 85L, 135L, 24-105L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rubberhead
Goldmember
Avatar
1,899 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: South Carolina's Lowcountry
     
Mar 16, 2008 22:22 |  #12

slivex,
Great comparison. The 60mm EF-S was taken on a 30D, while the 50 f/1.4 was taken on a Mark II. I switched to the XTi for the 60mm EF-S and the comparison actually favors the EF-S lens.

TripleOne,
At or above about f/2.0, the IQ of the 50mm f/1.8 and 50mm f/1.4 are about identical. Neither is very sharp wide open.

I'd suggest keeping the 1.8 and getting the 60mm f/2.8.


EQUIPMENT: 40D | Rebel XT | EF 70-200mm f/4L IS | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 28-135mm IS | EF-S 18-55mm IS | EF 50mm 1.8 - flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TripleOne
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
35 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Mar 17, 2008 04:25 |  #13

Thanks guys for the tips. I'm more towards the 60mm now.

N1as & Ecorick, is the EFS 60's focusing fast for non-macro shot?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ontopofm
Senior Member
300 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: CA
     
Jan 06, 2010 00:41 |  #14

sorry to bring this thread back but do you guys put a UV filter on either of these lenses? or the 85mm f1.8?


Phuc
Flickr (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
silvex
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,303 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 35
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Southern California, USA
     
Jan 06, 2010 00:56 |  #15

IMHO UV filters are just a gimmick by salesmen. I used to fall for that but not anymore. There are lots of threads about filters vs no-filters.


.
-Ed
CPS Platinum Member.
Canon Gear
SilvexPhoto.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

5,410 views & 0 likes for this thread
50 1.4 vs 60 2.8 Macro
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is raymondwup4
707 guests, 377 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.