Great lens and I wish I can keep it on all the time on my 400D, good for portraits but not so good as a walk around lens because it is just too long or even in a small studio.
Stfalco Junior Member 20 posts Joined Sep 2007 More info | Apr 10, 2008 09:53 | #46 Great lens and I wish I can keep it on all the time on my 400D, good for portraits but not so good as a walk around lens because it is just too long or even in a small studio.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aquagrl Member 46 posts Joined Feb 2008 Location: Indianapolis, IN More info | Apr 10, 2008 10:15 | #47 Mine finally came in Monday afternoon and of course hasn't come off my 20D since. Happy birthday to me! 8) Still adjusting to it but I am in love with the lens and my first prime. -Jessica
LOG IN TO REPLY |
timnosenzo Cream of the Crop 8,833 posts Likes: 14 Joined Sep 2005 Location: CT More info | mom22 wrote in post #5299818 ![]() I just bit the bullet and ordered with B&H. ForHisGlory wrote in post #5265466 ![]() i ordered it this morn. from adorama for 339 bucks. not bad. Congrats to both of you for picking up one of these lenses. It really offers great bang for the buck. ForHisGlory wrote in post #5265466 ![]() My concern is I will have to stand so far back. How far do you usually stand for family portraits out door? Are you looking to do a group shot of 15 to 20 people, or 3 to 5 people? On a crop camera, you're definitely going to have to back up a bit, but it really depends on how many people across there are. ForHisGlory wrote in post #5265466 ![]() What aperture do you usually recommend for these? can you do wide open on a 3 person shot? For tight portraits, I won't even use this lens with one person. You'll wind up with eyes in focus, nose and ears OOF. Not a great look IMHO. The good news is that even stopped down a bit you can easily manipulate the amount of background blur you'll get by moving closer or further away, and/or placing your subjects closer or further away from the background. ForHisGlory wrote in post #5265466 ![]() I like to have a nice bokeh. where would you place the center focus point...whose eyes? always nervous trying a new lens.... If you're going for tight, wide-open, super shallow DOF, focus on the eyes. If you focus on their nose, the eyes will be OOF. connecticut wedding photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheHoff Don't Hassle.... ![]() 8,804 posts Likes: 20 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Vancouver, BC More info | Apr 10, 2008 10:24 | #49 aquagrl wrote in post #5300075 ![]() TheHoff - I LOVE your dog portraits. Thanks, Jessica! ••Vancouver Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gvg45 Senior Member 534 posts Likes: 617 Joined Dec 2007 Location: Los Angeles, Ca. More info | Apr 10, 2008 10:40 | #50 TheHoff wrote in post #5300128 ![]() Thanks, Jessica! I was wondering why my keeper % was low... I thought I was just bad with the short DOF; nope, my 85 is slightly backfocusing. Off to Irvine it goes. ![]() Just an observation, but are you sure this was taken at a 45* angle? It just looks a little flat to me and could slightly skew the results. ~Greg
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdhender Senior Member ![]() 547 posts Joined Oct 2004 Location: Chicago More info | Apr 10, 2008 10:46 | #51 TheHoff wrote in post #5258800 ![]() Also wide open, 1.8 ![]() ![]() So amazing. Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ -POTN's Three legged Support- ![]() 15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Apr 10, 2008 11:05 | #52 Its an awesome and VERY sharp lens! The only way I would sell mine it to upgrade to the 85L. Otherwise its a definite keeper! [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheHoff Don't Hassle.... ![]() 8,804 posts Likes: 20 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Vancouver, BC More info | Apr 10, 2008 11:18 | #53 gvg45 wrote in post #5300245 ![]() Just an observation, but are you sure this was taken at a 45* angle? It just looks a little flat to me and could slightly skew the results. I think you're right but it was just confirming what I saw in my real world results. I should probably do another at the proper angle to send with the lens. It is only off by a hair; the previous owner didn't notice it but I've never had it above f/2 doing portraits so it was annoying me. ••Vancouver Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is Dave_M_Photo 1062 guests, 171 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |