I mean, even if its heavy, it would still sell. Like a 20-60 f/1.4 would be awesome.
Canon Soldier ..."kind of like Zooms"? 803 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Arrested with no pants in the nuthouse More info | Jun 27, 2008 18:18 | #1 I mean, even if its heavy, it would still sell. Like a 20-60 f/1.4 would be awesome. Na, just kidding, you are still a loser.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BobbyT Goldmember ![]() 1,202 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Jun 27, 2008 18:24 | #2 It would be huge and very expensive. Not as many would sell as you think.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Deadeye008 Member 136 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Utah More info | Jun 27, 2008 18:29 | #3 Exactly. Most people would rather carry around a f2.8 zoom and an f1.4 prime than a huge and expensive lens like that.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TaDa ...as cool as Perry ![]() 6,742 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: New York More info | Jun 27, 2008 19:02 | #4 Actually, Tamron makes a video camera that is 6-60mm with a 1.4 aperture. It weighs 13.4 oz. Now, figure in the difference needed for photographic glass, and I'd think that they could most likely get a constant aperture lens in the 17-50ish range with f/1.4 that would be a little bigger than the brick (24-70L) and maybe weigh slightly more. Reason why they won't is because it would take away business from primes. Name is Peter and here is my gear:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BobbyT Goldmember ![]() 1,202 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Jun 27, 2008 19:11 | #5 I don't think they care whether you buy zooms or primes, just as long as you buy.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] ![]() More info | Jun 27, 2008 19:18 | #6 Even if it was heavy and huge large aperture zoom, it would sell in great numbers if there were simply a R stripe around it and IS, as there is so many lenses sold to amateurs with money who know L as the status object, so they could increase the number of red L lenses appearing in their equipment list...it matters not that they don't truly need the fast aperture You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
randomlinh Senior Member ![]() 992 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Maryland More info | Jun 27, 2008 19:53 | #7 i'm thinking even with those buyers, the cost of R&D and production just wouldn't be worth the effort.. they'd make more money with another L prime
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AngryCorgi -Bouncing Boy- a POTN peion ![]() 11,545 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Surrounded by bunnies, squirrels and a couple of crazy corgis in NoVA... More info | Jun 27, 2008 20:06 | #8 Olympus makes a 14-35/2 (28-70, 35mm equiv) and a 35-100/2 (70-200, 35mm equiv) for the 4/3rds system. The problem is their bodies are not too spectacular. The E-3 they recently released is the first professional DSLR body they really have made that can compete with anything from Canon/Nikon. AngryCorgi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bagtagsell Senior Member ![]() 602 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2007 Location: St. Louis, MO More info | Jun 27, 2008 23:24 | #9 Those olympus lenses are around 2 grand each. Pretty cool. Mark Ryan Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
artyboy Senior Member ![]() 796 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2007 More info | you really pay thru your nose for an extra ONE stop of light from F/4 to F/2.8 on a zoom. that $500-600 difference in price could buy you a much faster prime lens! but its always about compromises, a prime gives you much more light at F/1.4 or F/2.0 but its not as versatile as a zoom. Canon 1D Mk III, 17-40 F/4L, 24-105 F/4L IS, 70-200 F/4L IS, 24 F/1.4L, 135 F/2L, Canon EF 1.4X II TC, Canon 580EX II, Slik 400DX, Lowepro CompuTrekker/Toploader 70AW
LOG IN TO REPLY |
robbie321 Member ![]() 172 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Auckland, New Zealand More info | Jun 27, 2008 23:49 | #11 TaDa wrote in post #5805787 ![]() Actually, Tamron makes a video camera that is 6-60mm with a 1.4 aperture. It weighs 13.4 oz. Now, figure in the difference needed for photographic glass, and I'd think that they could most likely get a constant aperture lens in the 17-50ish range with f/1.4 that would be a little bigger than the brick (24-70L) and maybe weigh slightly more. Reason why they won't is because it would take away business from primes. The difference however is that a video camera uses a much smaller sensor than a 35mm sensor and so the absolute dimensions of the aperture would be much larger and therefore impractical. Topic Photography, Auckland, New Zealand
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dragos Jianu Goldmember 1,768 posts Likes: 15 Joined Sep 2005 More info | Jun 28, 2008 01:18 | #12 TaDa wrote in post #5805787 ![]() I'd think that they could most likely get a constant aperture lens in the 17-50ish range with f/1.4 that would be a little bigger than the brick (24-70L) and maybe weigh slightly more. A LITTLE BIGGER ?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pasukun Goldmember ![]() 1,388 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: US More info | Jun 28, 2008 01:56 | #13 Double post... "the things we touch have no permanence.. as there is nothing we can hold onto in this world.. only by letting it go can we truly possess what is real.."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pasukun Goldmember ![]() 1,388 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: US More info | Jun 28, 2008 01:56 | #14 "Why dont they make a zoom faster than 2.8" "the things we touch have no permanence.. as there is nothing we can hold onto in this world.. only by letting it go can we truly possess what is real.."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BearSummer Senior Member ![]() 925 posts Likes: 12 Joined Jul 2003 Location: South East UK More info | Its a weight issue, for the lens to be able to open to f1.4 they would need to fit 2.8 times as many homunculi inside the lens which would make it heavier, the binding spells would be more complex and it would just end up being to expensive. Also if you dropped it, they'd be picking you up with a shovel. Moderation is for people that can't handle excess.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 925 guests, 278 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |