What is the best video card to use in conjunction with Windows XP and CS3? Currently running an Nvidia 5900xt, and tempted to upgrade the card.
Let me know.
splitfyre Senior Member 587 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: West Coast of Canada More info | Aug 08, 2008 18:14 | #1 What is the best video card to use in conjunction with Windows XP and CS3? Currently running an Nvidia 5900xt, and tempted to upgrade the card. Digital: Canon 5D2,5Dc,40D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark1 Cream of the Crop ![]() 6,725 posts Likes: 7 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Maryland More info | Aug 08, 2008 18:53 | #2 For photo, just about any card will work. Even onboard video thies days are fine. Photo editing is not a high FPS type of action so the extra memory and high speed video processors are wasted. And that is all the extra price is for on top of the line cards. There is no shading polygons and animating multiple textures. Only thing you need in Photo editing is the colors. ANd any video outout will accomidate. Sorry to dissapoint you. But most likely what you have is more than enough.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kento Goldmember ![]() 1,207 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2008 Location: Innsbruck, Austria More info | Aug 08, 2008 18:55 | #3 Mark1 wrote in post #6073062 ![]() For photo, just about any card will work. Even onboard video thies days are fine. Photo editing is not a high FPS trype of action so the extra memory and high speed video processors are wasted. And that is all the extra price is for on top of the line cards. There is no shading polygons and animating multiple textures. Only thing you need in Photo editing is the colors. ANd any video outout will accomidate. Sorry to dissapoint you. But most likely what you have is more than enough. Yep, buy a good monitor. So what you see in photoshop is whats actually being printed. My Tools
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark1 Cream of the Crop ![]() 6,725 posts Likes: 7 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Maryland More info | Aug 08, 2008 19:00 | #4 Its true. The monitor is probably more important than the video card for photo editing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer ![]() 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Aug 08, 2008 19:38 | #5 Makes little difference for XP, but integrated graphics will slow your system. I like nVidia based cards, get whatever's cheapest that has the outputs you need. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop ![]() 14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Aug 09, 2008 00:57 | #6 Unless you are doing vector type stuff, or plsying some of the latest games, then get the cheapest card you can find. I would get 512mb on board memory so that the card does not "steal" some of your main memory. Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KarlosDaJackal Goldmember ![]() 1,740 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2008 Location: Dublin, Ireland More info | ATI have traditionally had much better 2d quality. nVidia are very close now but for photo editing I'd go with an ATI every time. My Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2432 guests, 134 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |