can anyone tell me if its different than the 40D's auto ISO, or if its similar to the 5dmk2's auto ISO? just wondering
thanks
Sfordphoto Goldmember 2,564 posts Joined Feb 2008 More info | Oct 20, 2008 16:56 | #1 can anyone tell me if its different than the 40D's auto ISO, or if its similar to the 5dmk2's auto ISO? just wondering
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nervous Senior Member ![]() 372 posts Joined Oct 2008 More info | Oct 20, 2008 18:34 | #2 I've tested both 40D and 50D in AutoISO. I don't know how's good AutoISO on 5D, but here are the results of AutoISO testing of 40D and 50D, back-to-back. I set Av mode, F 4.0, focal range 35mm, spot metering, central point, Sigma 24-60/2.8, AutoISO on both. I am in the room with 4 lamps on, 3 on the ceiling and one on the table lighting the wall. 7D | 5D classic | EF-S 10-22 | EF 24-105 L IS | EF 70-300 IS USM | EF 85/1.8 | EF 50/1.8 II | Sigma 24-60/2.8 | Tamron 90/2.8 | 580EXII | 2x 420EX | 055XPro + 488RC2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sbbruin Member 116 posts Joined Aug 2008 More info | Oct 20, 2008 18:46 | #3 Nervous wrote in post #6530846 ![]() Aim on worse lighted wall - ISO 160, T=1/50 Same, but focal is 50mm - ISO 250, T=1/80 (wow!) Need I say more? AutoISO on 40D actually knows just two values - 400 and 800 and in fact is unusable. 50D shows a HUGE improvement here and I would use AutoISO on 50D with no hesistation. wow, you mean that the camera actually took into consideration the crop FOV and chose it as the minimum shutter speed?? that is pretty good!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nervous Senior Member ![]() 372 posts Joined Oct 2008 More info | Oct 20, 2008 18:52 | #4 Well, at least it seems so. 7D | 5D classic | EF-S 10-22 | EF 24-105 L IS | EF 70-300 IS USM | EF 85/1.8 | EF 50/1.8 II | Sigma 24-60/2.8 | Tamron 90/2.8 | 580EXII | 2x 420EX | 055XPro + 488RC2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gotmoose Member ![]() 46 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Burlington, Ontario More info | I'm loving the auto ISO option. It seems to work well, I've had few situations where it is not pretty much picking the ISO I would normally have to set. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
overclock Goldmember 1,191 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: Fort Worth, TX More info | Oct 20, 2008 22:24 | #6 The auto ISO on the 40D was and still is a gimmick.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sbbruin Member 116 posts Joined Aug 2008 More info | Oct 21, 2008 03:01 | #7 overclock wrote in post #6532070 ![]() The auto ISO on the 40D was and still is a gimmick. Auto ISO on the 50D is what the 40D should have been. Honestly, in many aspects the 50D is what the 40D should have been. dont tell that to the 40D owners who just bought their cameras before the 50D was announced!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nervous Senior Member ![]() 372 posts Joined Oct 2008 More info | Oct 21, 2008 08:54 | #8 Gotmoose wrote in post #6531934 ![]() I'm loving the auto ISO option. It seems to work well, I've had few situations where it is not pretty much picking the ISO I would normally have to set. If you shoot in Av + AutoISO then exposure correction dial will change ISO first and only if this is not enough it will change the shutter speed. So, you may correct the ISO easily, if you don't like the one AutoISO picked. 7D | 5D classic | EF-S 10-22 | EF 24-105 L IS | EF 70-300 IS USM | EF 85/1.8 | EF 50/1.8 II | Sigma 24-60/2.8 | Tamron 90/2.8 | 580EXII | 2x 420EX | 055XPro + 488RC2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nervous Senior Member ![]() 372 posts Joined Oct 2008 More info | Oct 21, 2008 08:55 | #9 sbbruin wrote in post #6532881 ![]() dont tell that to the 40D owners who just bought their cameras before the 50D was announced! Even after, since changes in AutoISO were not advertised at all.... 7D | 5D classic | EF-S 10-22 | EF 24-105 L IS | EF 70-300 IS USM | EF 85/1.8 | EF 50/1.8 II | Sigma 24-60/2.8 | Tamron 90/2.8 | 580EXII | 2x 420EX | 055XPro + 488RC2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fiveFPS Goldmember 1,180 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2007 More info | Oct 21, 2008 13:29 | #10 hahahaa... good one! Canon XTI | Canon 430ex | Crumpler 7MDH | 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ef2 Goldmember ![]() 1,135 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Pittsburgh More info | Oct 21, 2008 13:53 | #11 Nervous wrote in post #6530846 ![]() I've tested both 40D and 50D in AutoISO. I don't know how's good AutoISO on 5D, but here are the results of AutoISO testing of 40D and 50D, back-to-back. I set Av mode, F 4.0, focal range 35mm, spot metering, central point, Sigma 24-60/2.8, AutoISO on both. I am in the room with 4 lamps on, 3 on the ceiling and one on the table lighting the wall. First is the 40D. Aim on far wall - ISO 800, T=1/10 Aim on a lamp - ISO 400, T=1/6400 (what????) Aim on lighted near wall - ISO 400, T=1/640 (too bad!). Aim on worse lighted wall - ISO 400, T=1/160 Same, but focal is 50mm - ISO 400, T=1/200 (ah, whatever...) 50D, everything is the same: Aim on far wall - ISO 1600, T=1/20 (expectable) Aim on a lamp - ISO 100, T=1/1000 (!!!!! GREAT!) Aim on lighted near wall - ISO 100, T=1/80 (!!!!). Aim on worse lighted wall - ISO 160, T=1/50 Same, but focal is 50mm - ISO 250, T=1/80 (wow!) Need I say more? AutoISO on 40D actually knows just two values - 400 and 800 and in fact is unusable. 50D shows a HUGE improvement here and I would use AutoISO on 50D with no hesistation. This sounds very promising, and might be exciting if the 5DMkII has the same functionality. 5D Mk III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Scott McLoud Senior Member ![]() 557 posts Joined Oct 2008 Location: Highlands More info | Oct 21, 2008 14:05 | #12 ![]() ef2 wrote in post #6535459 ![]() This sounds very promising, and might be exciting if the 5DMkII has the same functionality. I agree, this does look promising.... wonder if the 40d had a fault in it and this was them fixing it or if it was just built that way
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nervous Senior Member ![]() 372 posts Joined Oct 2008 More info | Oct 21, 2008 14:12 | #13 40D was built this way, since even manual says that in Av mode AutoISO works only in 400-800 range. 7D | 5D classic | EF-S 10-22 | EF 24-105 L IS | EF 70-300 IS USM | EF 85/1.8 | EF 50/1.8 II | Sigma 24-60/2.8 | Tamron 90/2.8 | 580EXII | 2x 420EX | 055XPro + 488RC2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sbbruin Member 116 posts Joined Aug 2008 More info | Oct 21, 2008 16:25 | #14 ef2 wrote in post #6535459 ![]() This sounds very promising, and might be exciting if the 5DMkII has the same functionality. new 5d DOES have this technology. its auto ISO works according to the lens you have mounted, so its set to a minimum shutter speed of 1/focal length. i know this will definitely work for primes, im not sure about the zooms.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sbbruin Member 116 posts Joined Aug 2008 More info | Oct 21, 2008 16:26 | #15 Scott McLoud wrote in post #6535537 ![]() I agree, this does look promising.... wonder if the 40d had a fault in it and this was them fixing it or if it was just built that way ![]() whats funny is that a simple firmware upgrade SHOULD take care of this issue, but it seems canon doesnt think its worthy of it...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is rickldewitt 1172 guests, 192 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |