SF Lights Senior Member 682 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Northern California More info | Dec 19, 2008 02:57 | #1 ![]() Deck One - Star Trek
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlyingPhotog Cream of the "Prop" ![]() 57,560 posts Likes: 160 Joined May 2007 Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft More info | Dec 19, 2008 03:13 | #2 Looks like it stopped a bullet... Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 19, 2008 03:14 | #3 ![]() Look at the price it went for! Deck One - Star Trek
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlyingPhotog Cream of the "Prop" ![]() 57,560 posts Likes: 160 Joined May 2007 Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft More info | Dec 19, 2008 03:17 | #4 sflights wrote in post #6907433 ![]() Look at the price it went for! I'm not familiar with the history of Leica but I'm guessing a body from that early is worth adding to a "serious" collection? Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 19, 2008 03:22 | #5 ![]() I found some new models for about twice that price, so I wouldn't consider it to be that good of a deal. Deck One - Star Trek
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 19, 2008 03:25 | #6 That right there is my goal in life. To be rich enough to not think twice before buying an "absolutely non functional piece of ancient metal in original black paint" and be able to justify that its a collectors item. flickr photostream
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlyingPhotog Cream of the "Prop" ![]() 57,560 posts Likes: 160 Joined May 2007 Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft More info | Dec 19, 2008 03:27 | #7 One source I found re: Leica prices... Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 19, 2008 03:32 | #8 ![]() So he bought a broken one for more than a working one is worth? Deck One - Star Trek
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cryforashadow Senior Member ![]() 321 posts Joined May 2008 Location: whatever. More info | Dec 19, 2008 05:48 | #9 WOW. And I'd think it belonged to garbage.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Elphaba Senior Member ![]() 377 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2005 Location: 'burbs of Washington, DC More info | Dec 19, 2008 09:06 | #10 Obviously the buyer thought it was worth paying more than the estimated book price, putting into play an aspect that is very relevant to any market: at times, personal want is an entity that is more than willing to pay outside of the official book value. 5Dc grip'd * 60D grip'd* 17-40 L * 24-70 L * 70-200 F2.8 IS L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
medhora Member ![]() 31 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Brampton, ON More info | Maybe the buyer has sentimental value for the camera, long lost one! _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shooterman village idiot, actually a genius! ![]() More info | Dec 19, 2008 10:43 | #12 $787 for a POS. Amazing indeed...... Randy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
brecklundin Goldmember ![]() 2,179 posts Joined Jun 2008 More info | Dec 19, 2008 13:35 | #14 _Sim wrote in post #6908833 ![]() Wow. Makes me wonder how many hundreds of dollars I've thrown away over the years. Mental note: list things on ebay first. Actually anymore ya need to research your goodies first...apparently the key to that body is the black as well as the serial number under 1-million. Notice the higher serial numbers sell for significantly less. Real men shoot Pentax because we're born with our own Canon's!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
_Sim Senior Member ![]() 532 posts Joined Nov 2008 Location: Toronto More info | Dec 19, 2008 13:43 | #15 Yeah, there's research and knowledge involved... of course. My comment was made tongue-in-cheek. I seriously doubt I've actually had anything valuable in my possession because I'm pretty new to the hobby and have had very few hand-me-downs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is DTPhotography 763 guests, 205 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |