Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 23 Dec 2008 (Tuesday) 08:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

New 40d - gymnastics - bad results

 
run53
Member
149 posts
Joined Feb 2008
     
Dec 23, 2008 08:33 |  #1

I need some help....anyone seen this before. About 1/3 of my shots came out like this (this shot is straight from the camera no PP). Why is half yellowed like this?

I shot gymnastics all last season with this lens (85m f/1.8 ) and my rebel XT and never had this problem. First time shooting in this gym and my brand new 40d. Needless to say, very disappointed. I did manage to get some decent ones, but like I said about 1/3 were like this (either half the photo or the entire one).

Is there something wrong with the new 40d?
Is it operator error?
Is there some strange affect from the lighting (which was horrible by the way)?

Thanks for your help......I was so excited to use the new camera and now I'm bummed.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Canon 40D* Canon XT * Canon 430EX II * Canon 85 f/1.8 * Canon 70-200 f/2.8ISL * Canon 18-55 IS * Manfrotto 3021XPROB w/488RC2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joedlh
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,480 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 643
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea.
     
Dec 23, 2008 08:45 |  #2

Your image file does not have the exif data attached, so it's not possible to examine the camera settings, particularly the white balance option. If you are only seeing this effect in 1/3 of your shots, then I suggest that it's not a fault in the camera. If the camera were faulty, I imagine that you'd see it in every shot. Take a shot of a blank wall with uniform lighting and see if you get it. Or a clear sky, or uniformly overcast sky.

If you determine that the camera is not the problem, then scrutinize the setting. I see a fluorescent light. Is there another light source off to the right. If it's a bright incandescent or even a sodium light, then your camera was trying to do the best it could under extreme lighting. Fluorescents tend to impose a greenish tint on an image. That it looks more bluish here suggests that your camera -- if it was on auto white balance -- was seeing a strong red/amber source to the right and tried, unsuccessfully, to adapt to it.

Also, clone out the head shadow in the bottom right. It's spooky.


Joe
Gear: Kodak Instamatic, Polaroid Swinger. Oh you meant gear now. :rolleyes:
http://photo.joedlh.ne​t (external link)
Editing ok

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Markitos
Goldmember
Avatar
1,615 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC
     
Dec 23, 2008 08:51 |  #3

I have had this same issue in a building with flourescent lights... If your shutter speed is fast enough and your shot timed right, you are catching the cycling/pulsing of the light, which changes color temperature a lot, apparently... mine were from a wedding reception, so imagine my dismay when some of the good shots were ruined by the crappy lighting.


|Fuji X-E2|Fuji X-E1|Fuji 18 f/2|Fuji 35 f/1.4|Fuji 60 f/2.4 macro|Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4|Fuji 55-200 f/3.5-4.8

http://www.newschoolof​photography.com/forum/ (external link)Where I Hone My Skillz (external link)
Where My "Serious" Stuff Is (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BradT0517
I almost caught fire
Avatar
3,010 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Dec 23, 2008 08:53 |  #4

If the entire area was lit with fluorescent bulbs that is the cause of your problem. The reason why is because the lights rapidly cycle in colors as they turn on and off. This same thing occurs in high school basketball gyms and sometimes even football stadiums. If I remember correctly it is best to shoot at/around 1/120 shutterspeed to reduce the occurance of catching the color shift. Thus saying the higher your shutter speed the more likely you are to have a color shift occur. Sorry if this all blended together I'm still waking up, I'll come back later to restate myself.
Brad


My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Markitos
Goldmember
Avatar
1,615 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC
     
Dec 23, 2008 08:57 |  #5

That's okay--it's been explained twice now, so hopefully he'll get it. ;)


|Fuji X-E2|Fuji X-E1|Fuji 18 f/2|Fuji 35 f/1.4|Fuji 60 f/2.4 macro|Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4|Fuji 55-200 f/3.5-4.8

http://www.newschoolof​photography.com/forum/ (external link)Where I Hone My Skillz (external link)
Where My "Serious" Stuff Is (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
waynedsargent
Senior Member
Avatar
405 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: West Paris, ME
     
Dec 23, 2008 09:00 |  #6

These were shot at 1/400 how is the op catching a color cycle? I have seen this before with slower shutter speeds that are a degree of 1/60. But once you get up higer shouldnt it reduce?


1D Mark IV 70-200 2.8L 28-70L 580ex and a bunch of alien bees stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Markitos
Goldmember
Avatar
1,615 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC
     
Dec 23, 2008 09:01 |  #7

waynedsargent wrote in post #6932347 (external link)
But once you get up higer shouldnt it reduce?

Yes, but you'll still get them occasionally.


|Fuji X-E2|Fuji X-E1|Fuji 18 f/2|Fuji 35 f/1.4|Fuji 60 f/2.4 macro|Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4|Fuji 55-200 f/3.5-4.8

http://www.newschoolof​photography.com/forum/ (external link)Where I Hone My Skillz (external link)
Where My "Serious" Stuff Is (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
waynedsargent
Senior Member
Avatar
405 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: West Paris, ME
     
Dec 23, 2008 09:03 |  #8

Yeah I can see occasionally but not at a 1/3 rate?

And to the OP defiantly get a white balance or shoot in RAW.


1D Mark IV 70-200 2.8L 28-70L 580ex and a bunch of alien bees stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stathunter
"I am no one really"
Avatar
5,659 posts
Likes: 58
Joined Aug 2006
Location: California & Michigan
     
Dec 23, 2008 09:04 |  #9

Fluorescent lights are the cause of all of our problems.... global warming.... wars.....etc.....ban those dang lights!


Scott
"Do or do not, there is no try"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr ­ B ­ Pix
Senior Member
492 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2007
     
Dec 23, 2008 09:14 |  #10

Read THIS (external link)


My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stathunter
"I am no one really"
Avatar
5,659 posts
Likes: 58
Joined Aug 2006
Location: California & Michigan
     
Dec 23, 2008 09:18 |  #11

Mr B Pix wrote in post #6932417 (external link)
Read THIS (external link)

Thanks. Good info.


Scott
"Do or do not, there is no try"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
waynedsargent
Senior Member
Avatar
405 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: West Paris, ME
     
Dec 23, 2008 09:50 |  #12

Good link very interesting information.


1D Mark IV 70-200 2.8L 28-70L 580ex and a bunch of alien bees stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snyderman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,084 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Wadsworth, Ohio
     
Dec 23, 2008 10:13 |  #13

Markitos wrote in post #6932348 (external link)
Yes, but you'll still get them occasionally.

To support your statement, I was shooting basketball at 1/500 and sometimes even 1/640 and caught the scoreboard OFF due to the cycling of the lights inside the scoreboard!

so yes, it's possible at even pretty fast shutter speeds.

dave


Canon 5D2 > 35L-85L-135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
run53
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
149 posts
Joined Feb 2008
     
Dec 23, 2008 15:51 as a reply to  @ snyderman's post |  #14

Thanks for all the input....I'm beginning to think it was indeed the lighting in this gym. I Shot 12 meets last year with my XT and never ran into this. It's hard to think none of those gyms had fluorescent bulbs. I never shot at this particular gym before though.

Let me see if i can answer some of the questions in the following posts.

Shot settings were RAW, ISO=3200 SS=400, Ap=f2.0, Spot meter, AI Servo.

Also, that black thing at the bottom is not a shadow. It was part of a gymnastics mural on the wall.


Your image file does not have the exif data attached, so it's not possible to examine the camera settings, particularly the white balance option. If you are only seeing this effect in 1/3 of your shots, then I suggest that it's not a fault in the camera. If the camera were faulty, I imagine that you'd see it in every shot. Take a shot of a blank wall with uniform lighting and see if you get it. Or a clear sky, or uniformly overcast sky.

I can see the exif on my browser...not sure why you can't see it. The blank wall tests out ok. In fact I've never seen this in any of the practice shots I took at home before the meet. Starting to feel better it's not the camera

Is there another light source off to the right.

Pretty sure that all of the lights were the same as the one in the image.


If the entire area was lit with fluorescent bulbs that is the cause of your problem.

As near as I can remember it was 100% fluorescent.


Canon 40D* Canon XT * Canon 430EX II * Canon 85 f/1.8 * Canon 70-200 f/2.8ISL * Canon 18-55 IS * Manfrotto 3021XPROB w/488RC2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DDCSD
GIVIN' GOOD KARMA
Avatar
13,313 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2007
Location: South Dakota
     
Dec 23, 2008 20:27 |  #15

waynedsargent wrote in post #6932347 (external link)
These were shot at 1/400 how is the op catching a color cycle? I have seen this before with slower shutter speeds that are a degree of 1/60. But once you get up higer shouldnt it reduce?

No, it will get worse. With a higher shutter speed you are only catching a portion of the cycle. In this case, there are multiple lights, and the lights are cycling. The lights won't cycle at the same color temp at the same time for all of the lights, so you'll get one while it is green, one while it is white, one while it is yellowish....

If it was a single light source, you could simply adjust the white balance in RAW. If it was two lights, you'd get lucky more often and not get the varying color casts in as many frames. With multiple lights, it will happen fairly often.

You can take the raw image and process them with different WB settings, and blend the images to get a decent looking image.

It is a lot of work though. Not much fun.


Derek
Bucketman Karma Fund
https://photography-on-the.net …php?p=9903477#p​ost9903477
POTN FF L2 MadTown Birds


Full Gear List & Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,534 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
New 40d - gymnastics - bad results
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Neverlost99
1302 guests, 223 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.