Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 29 Jan 2009 (Thursday) 07:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Jobo Photo GPS

 
nadtz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,483 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jan 30, 2009 15:06 |  #16

Wilt wrote in post #7220623 (external link)
One fundamental advantage of the Jobo is the fact that it only records positions when you press the shutter button...it does not have hundreds of thousands of extraneous positions in a log file which rely upon synchronization of the camera time and GPS time in order to pair the position to the photo.

The downside is the need to mount the Jobo in the hot shoe (or, I presume it has a capability to be tethered to a camera with a PC cord, which itself is bothersome).

Yeah, I think its actually a neat idea, but using the hotshoe is a deal killer for me. Given the size of a GPS log file, and current software that easily allows time syncronization, even thousands of waypoints and time mismatch isn't a big deal so long as you can do some math. Canon's grip+GPS solution seems overly cumbersome as well, I need a grip + GPS unit... when I could just leave the GPS unit attached to my belt or bag and sync later.

While I like technology, I also like simplicity. Right now for my use for geotagging it still seems a good GPS unit and tagging images later is still the best solution. I know I personally would rather have built in GPS functionality than a print button, but hey =)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,217 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4347
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jan 30, 2009 15:20 |  #17

Does anyone, other than Grandpa Bob, use the Print button?!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
souporman
THREAD ­ STARTER
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2011
Avatar
5,462 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Sep 2006
Location: London, UK
     
Jan 30, 2009 19:19 |  #18

nadtz wrote in post #7221757 (external link)
Yeah, I think its actually a neat idea, but using the hotshoe is a deal killer for me. Given the size of a GPS log file, and current software that easily allows time syncronization, even thousands of waypoints and time mismatch isn't a big deal so long as you can do some math. Canon's grip+GPS solution seems overly cumbersome as well, I need a grip + GPS unit... when I could just leave the GPS unit attached to my belt or bag and sync later.

While I like technology, I also like simplicity. Right now for my use for geotagging it still seems a good GPS unit and tagging images later is still the best solution. I know I personally would rather have built in GPS functionality than a print button, but hey =)

I wasn't planning on bringing my flash along, so the only thing I'd lose out on is my hotshoe level (which I admit, I do use quite a bit...)

Wilt wrote in post #7221843 (external link)
Does anyone, other than Grandpa Bob, use the Print button?!

Don't have one of those on my camera :P


http://www.evilkitchen​.ca (external link) (365 (external link)) .
500px (external link)
Twitter (external link)http://365.evilkitchen​.ca (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JWright
Planes, trains and ham radio...
Avatar
18,399 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Dec 2004
     
Jan 30, 2009 21:23 as a reply to  @ souporman's post |  #19

I use a Garmin GPSMap 76Csx that records the track data to a Micro SD card installed in the unit. When I'm ready to download my pictures to the computer, I connect the GPS to the computer via USB and the computer reads it as a drive. I use DownloaderPro to download and it reads the track data in the GPS, matches it to the time the photo was taken and if there's a match, it writes the coordinate data to an xmp sidecar file in the same folder it downloads the RAW images to.


John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Jan 31, 2009 09:09 as a reply to  @ JWright's post |  #20

Wilt wrote in post #7220623 (external link)
One fundamental advantage of the Jobo is the fact that it only records positions when you press the shutter button...it does not have hundreds of thousands of extraneous positions in a log file which rely upon synchronization of the camera time and GPS time in order to pair the position to the photo.

The downside is the need to mount the Jobo in the hot shoe (or, I presume it has a capability to be tethered to a camera with a PC cord, which itself is bothersome).

How fast are you moving between shots that a minute (even) time difference will throw off your location by much at all? The software solutions I've seen that use a conventional GPS track have also got provisions for entering (once) the time difference between your GPS and your camera and automatically applying that to the track data when matching. "Extraneous" position data's ignored by the program when it's matching.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,217 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4347
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jan 31, 2009 15:03 |  #21

Jon wrote in post #7226057 (external link)
How fast are you moving between shots that a minute (even) time difference will throw off your location by much at all? The software solutions I've seen that use a conventional GPS track have also got provisions for entering (once) the time difference between your GPS and your camera and automatically applying that to the track data when matching. "Extraneous" position data's ignored by the program when it's matching.

Jon,
I know 'the solution'. One issue is whether or not there is a good utility to synch the camera time with GPS time, or if there is an easy way to calculate the differential between them. For most purposes error in time may not mean a really large difference in time, but imagine that an error of 2 minutes existed in the computation of the time difference and you happened to by flying over Hawaii in a helicopter...it might show you in the wrong place by 300' and plot the photo on the map in the wrong location by that much.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bruce ­ Watson
Senior Member
Avatar
530 posts
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Ajax for the work week and on weekends, south of Ottawa, Canada
     
Jan 31, 2009 15:19 |  #22

Wilt wrote in post #7227627 (external link)
Jon,
I know 'the solution'. One issue is whether or not there is a good utility to synch the camera time with GPS time, or if there is an easy way to calculate the differential between them. For most purposes error in time may not mean a really large difference in time, but imagine that an error of 2 minutes existed in the computation of the time difference and you happened to by flying over Hawaii in a helicopter...it might show you in the wrong place by 300' and plot the photo on the map in the wrong location by that much.

I always double check the time on my gps (merax) and camera before travelling, once set, there is only seconds of variance.


Cheers,
Bruce Watson
My Camera Bag Overfloweth...........​....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nadtz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,483 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jan 31, 2009 17:46 |  #23

Wilt wrote in post #7227627 (external link)
Jon,
I know 'the solution'. One issue is whether or not there is a good utility to synch the camera time with GPS time, or if there is an easy way to calculate the differential between them. For most purposes error in time may not mean a really large difference in time, but imagine that an error of 2 minutes existed in the computation of the time difference and you happened to by flying over Hawaii in a helicopter...it might show you in the wrong place by 300' and plot the photo on the map in the wrong location by that much.

My computer and GPS time are synced via NTP, its not that hard to keep my camera within a few seconds of those. Even if camera time was off substantially, all the software I have tried has some facility for adjusting/syncing the time. Aside of covering DST I don't think I've ever had any major issues. I know of someone who wrote a script to check the time from exif and his track file via some perl wizardry and set the differential automagically, I'm sure you could do the same with any other language of choice given that you know the current time, and have a reference image to sync between the GPS and the camera images (and of course can read the exif data).

Then again, my inner geek is showing... I find things like that fun (and am thinking out how to script that as we speak...)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,231 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Jobo Photo GPS
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Nat Zagninski
885 guests, 182 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.