Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
POTN forums are closing 31.12.2023. Please see https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1530921 and other posts in that thread for details.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 21 Feb 2009 (Saturday) 04:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

A crack @ M31 processing (image not mine)

 
dpastern
Cream of the Crop
13,765 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Ipswich, Queensland, Australia
     
Feb 21, 2009 04:54 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

Image data from:

http://www.mistisoftwa​re.com/astronomy/index​_fits.htm (external link)

In accordance with image usage rules:

Image Acquisition by Jim Misti and Steve Mazlin

I've done the processing using Photoshop CS2 and FITS Liberator, using the tutorials here (brilliant tutorials imho):

http://rdelsol.com/Pre​sentations.html (external link)

In lieu of having clear skies to actually use my own scope/DSLR setup, I've taken to learning how to process astro images using other peoples. Since the owners of these data files are kind enough to 1) allow others to use, i.e. play around with them, and 2) post the resultant PP shots on websites etc, I'm hard @ work learning :-) This image has taken me a few hours of carefully following the tutorials etc. I've had a *lot* of fun doing this. I'm sure the image could be made better, this is really my first attempt!

Without further ado (large image download, may take some time to display):

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


I'd really like to thank both Jim Misti and Steve Mazlin for their kindness in offering these images to play with.

Cheers,

Dave

http://www.macro-images.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris.bailey
Goldmember
2,061 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
     
Feb 21, 2009 10:56 |  #2

I have played with the same data in the past and very good it is. Your process has blown out the core and clipped the black, the formeer being the major trick to imaging and processing M31.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dpastern
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
13,765 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Ipswich, Queensland, Australia
     
Feb 21, 2009 12:03 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

Yeah, I realised that I blew the core - hence the practicing :-)

Dave


http://www.macro-images.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dpastern
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
13,765 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Ipswich, Queensland, Australia
     
Feb 22, 2009 04:21 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

I'm not sure what you meant by clipping the black (or how you could tell so, unless you mean the histogram creeping up the black end?). Here's a 2nd attempt:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Dave

http://www.macro-images.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
policy
Senior Member
Avatar
305 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Elk Grove Village, IL
     
Feb 22, 2009 07:27 |  #5

Wow! What a difference!


Canon Digital Rebel T5i, EF-S 17-85mm IS, EF-S 18-135mm IS STM, EF-S 40mm f2.8, EF 50mm f1.8, Speedlite 430EX + some stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris.bailey
Goldmember
2,061 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
     
Feb 22, 2009 08:35 |  #6

Second is much much better and closer to what I got with the same data, core is still a little blown. Clipping the black is pretty obvious as empty space is not jet black. If you consider where that the in astrophotography all of the data is squeezed into a very narrow portion of the histogram, by clipping the backkground to black, you are loosing some of those photons you have worked so hard to get a hold of. If you avoid clipping the black with this data you will find that the faint outer reaches of M31 almost stretch from corner to corner.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nighthound
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,675 posts
Gallery: 224 photos
Best ofs: 24
Likes: 4526
Joined Aug 2007
     
Feb 22, 2009 09:48 as a reply to  @ chris.bailey's post |  #7

You're making progress Dave and that's the goal. You did well.

To better demonstrate black point clipping I attached your image histogram and one from one of my attempts. I don't know how much total data was collected in your image so I realize I'm not comparing apples to apples in these two images but it does help demonstrate what "clipping" is and looks like.

As you can see all channels are pushed all the way left on your histogram graph. The red and blue channels being the most clipped. Try to aim for a histogram the peaks away from the left side as well as one that has all three channels peaking at the same area on the graph, this will insure better color balance. It's a good idea to keep the multi-channel histogram in view during the entire process to help keep an eye on color balance and clipping.

IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Nighthd/Astrophotography/test/tst2/clip.jpg

IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Nighthd/Astrophotography/test/tst2/noclipx.jpg

Hope this helps some.

Steve
Canon Gear: 1D Mark IV | 1D Mark II | 5D | 20D | 500L IS (f/4) | 100-400L
SteveEllwoodPhotograph​y.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris.bailey
Goldmember
2,061 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
     
Feb 22, 2009 13:16 |  #8

A quick play with that data gets. Core is still alittle hot (but then it is in the L channel of the data) and its a little green and has a bit of a gradient to it but you get the idea.

I have found the histogram in PS a bit insenstive for astro images and prefer the precision of PixInsight


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dpastern
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
13,765 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Ipswich, Queensland, Australia
     
Feb 22, 2009 14:11 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

Ah good, the black clipping was what I thought you meant. I'll probably have another go at this during either this week, or probably the weekend where I have more time @ hand.

Chris - I did have the galaxy dust lanes that far extended at one stage during my processing, but added some contrast which ended up removing some of the dust on the outer edges.

Thanks Steve for the clipping visuals - excellent, I have some idea what I'm doing! And need to do.

A question - how did you both manage to present the core like that? It looks far nicer and more natural than my 2nd attempt, more gradual.

Thanks for the input, much appreciated.

Cheers,

Dave


http://www.macro-images.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dpastern
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
13,765 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Ipswich, Queensland, Australia
     
Feb 22, 2009 14:13 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

Oh, and Steve, that's the 2nd M31 shot I've seen with a lot of Blue nebulosity in it. I don't seem to be able to pull that out of the data, anything I'm missing?

Dave


http://www.macro-images.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MidnightSun
Goldmember
Avatar
1,204 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Afton, VA / Korat, Thailand
     
Feb 27, 2009 16:52 as a reply to  @ dpastern's post |  #11

Nice progress and info. Processing is what I'm trying to get a handle on now. Just reading everything I can find and alot of practice......


Dave
Canon 350D, AE-1, Orion 8" Newt. f/4.9; EQ6 w/ modified motor drive; Orion 70mm f/10 Refractor Guide Scope; Celestron NexImage CCD Imager; Starshoot Autoguider. Orion Electronic Focusers.
Astro Setup / Midnight Sun Astrophotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dpastern
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
13,765 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Ipswich, Queensland, Australia
     
Feb 27, 2009 17:47 |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

MidnightSun wrote in post #7420974 (external link)
Nice progress and info. Processing is what I'm trying to get a handle on now. Just reading everything I can find and alot of practice......

That's what I'm doing Dave!

Dave


http://www.macro-images.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

9,365 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
A crack @ M31 processing (image not mine)
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
3397 guests, 94 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.