Wow! Thanks for the great link.
Apr 25, 2009 18:31 | #16 Wow! Thanks for the great link.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joemama Senior Member  666 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Earth More info | Apr 25, 2009 19:20 | #17  Permanent banyogibear wrote in post #7803239  Wow! Thanks for the great link. You're welcome. How's the saying go? A picture is worth a thousand words? : ) --joe
LOG IN TO REPLY |
booja Goldmember 1,638 posts Likes: 102 Joined Jan 2008 Location: houston, tx More info | Apr 25, 2009 21:34 | #18 yogibear wrote in post #7802326 I currently have the 24-105 and 70-200 f/4 IS lens. I'm thinking about adding a 17-40 but don't know if it's worth it because I'll only be gaining an additional 7mm. Will the additional 7mm in width make a significant difference? I own both a 5d II and a 40D. If the difference is not that much then I'll probably go in a different direction and get the Sigma 50 1.4 for its low light and bokeh advantage. Unfortunately, I only have funds for just one more lens. the 24-105 is decently wide on the 5d and leave the zoom on the cropped. but if you must get a wide lens the 17-40 on the 5d is really wide... like a 10-22 on a cropped... even though the 10-22 equivalent is probably a 16-35 on a ff camera
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is Isa-FR 662 guests, 224 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
