I was completely taken back with sharpness of the 50D & the 10-22mm. No need to micro-adjust the lens. Lensalign was dead on. Have others found this to be the norm?
May 01, 2009 21:53 | #1 I was completely taken back with sharpness of the 50D & the 10-22mm. No need to micro-adjust the lens. Lensalign was dead on. Have others found this to be the norm? 1Dx MKII | 5D MKIV | Sony a7Riv | 5Ds r | Sony a7Siii | Sony a9ii | 14 f2.8 II | 50 f1.2 | 85 f1.2 | 135 f2 | 24-70 f2.8 II | 11-24 f4 | 35 f1.4 II | Pentax 645Z | SMC Pentax-DA 645 25mm F4 AL | SMC Pentax-D FA 645 55mm F2.8 AL | Pentax 90mm f/2.8 D FA 645 Macro ED AW SR | SMC Pentax-D FA 645 200mm f/4 IF | SMC Pentax-D FA 645 300mm f/4 ED IF | SMC FA 645 400mm f/5.6 ED IF Lens | FujiFilm GFX 100
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!"  More info | May 01, 2009 22:30 | #2 TheMissouriShooter wrote in post #7841671  I was completely taken back with sharpness of the 50D & the 10-22mm. No need to micro-adjust the lens. Lensalign was dead on. Have others found this to be the norm? From what I understand the 10-22 is supposed to be one of the 2 best wides you can get Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kingdaddy Senior Member  396 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Fort Worth More info | May 01, 2009 22:49 | #3 I thought all Wide angle lenses are inhearntly sarp because of their DOF. 6D | 7D | XSI | EF-S 10-22 | EF 50 1.4 | EF 24-105L | 100-400L │ EF-100mm Macro| MT-24EX │580 EXII | Black Rapid RS-5 | lots of Think Tank.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop  14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | May 01, 2009 22:51 | #4 I am always impressed by my 10-22. Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dino8031 Senior Member  849 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2005 Location: Boulder, Colorado More info | Not surprised. The 10-22 is an awesome lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Frads Member  76 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Edmonton, Alberta More info | May 01, 2009 22:57 | #6 yeah I loved my 10-22mm, it was sharp, but I guess I never worried too much because everything was in focus... 5D, canon 24-70mm 2.8, 50mm 1.4, 430ex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jblaschke Goldmember  More info | I've always enjoyed it on my 400D, but when we put it on The Wife's 50D I was blown away. The Wife had done a bridal shoot, and a sequence came up that was amazingly crisp. I asked her "Did you use the Nifty on these?" She called up the Exif data and we were both stunned that it read 22mm. Canon 7D | Canon 50D IR modified | Canon EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS L | Canon FD 500mm 8.0 Reflex | Canon EF 85mm 1.8 | Canon EF 50mm 1.8 mk I | Canon EF-S 10-22mm | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Meade 645 (762mm f/5)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vfrstephen Member 167 posts Joined Aug 2008 More info | May 01, 2009 23:05 | #8 Yes i was blown away by the image quality of the 10-22 on a 50d compared with my 400d. Sharpness spot on my lense too. 400D,30v , EF 24-105L, EF 50 1.8, EF 85 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jblaschke Goldmember More info | May 02, 2009 01:19 | #9 vfrstephen wrote in post #7842019 Yes i was blown away by the image quality of the 10-22 on a 50d compared with my 400d. Sharpness spot on my lense too. I think this is a case where the 50D's much-maligned pixel density is a positive, maxing out the len's full potential as opposed to exposing the flaws of lesser glass. Canon 7D | Canon 50D IR modified | Canon EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS L | Canon FD 500mm 8.0 Reflex | Canon EF 85mm 1.8 | Canon EF 50mm 1.8 mk I | Canon EF-S 10-22mm | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Meade 645 (762mm f/5)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
By-tor Goldmember  More info | My 10-22mm has become my fav. to use and play with... The shots are amazing... Fujifilm: X-Pro3, X100V, 16mm f2.8, 35mm 1.4, 50mm f2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sebr Goldmember  4,628 posts Likes: 9 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sweden/France More info | May 02, 2009 01:47 | #11 Yes, the 10-22 is one sharp lens Sebastien
LOG IN TO REPLY |
roentarre Goldmember  1,130 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | May 02, 2009 02:57 | #12 |
budjames Hatchling 2 posts Joined Aug 2004 More info | May 02, 2009 03:14 | #13 I have one for sale, excellent condition and hardly used. I'm also selling my 40D. I have the 16-35 MkII and it's awesome too on my 1DsMkIII. Now I want to get a 5DMkII, so the I will have no use for the 10-22.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lownotelee dammit, i suck at observation...  250 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2008 Location: I come from a land down under More info | May 02, 2009 04:26 | #15 KenjiS wrote in post #7841841 From what I understand the 10-22 is supposed to be one of the 2 best wides you can get I'm guessing from your signature the other is the Sigma 10-20?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is jroth614 886 guests, 286 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
