Hey, ive got a 350D and am gonna invest in some filters for it. Obviously a Polarizing is a must but any others i should look at getting and where is the best place? Cheers
garetheves Member 41 posts Joined Mar 2007 More info | May 05, 2009 15:31 | #1 Hey, ive got a 350D and am gonna invest in some filters for it. Obviously a Polarizing is a must but any others i should look at getting and where is the best place? Cheers Still an amateur:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kokakaste2 Goldmember ![]() 3,546 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Luxembourg More info | May 05, 2009 15:37 | #2 You should imo get neutral density filters and gradual neutral density filters. Something like Cokin A or P series would be good (maybe not the best quality but very affordable). These would be filters i would buy if i have to chose, they offer a lot of oppurtunities. ^^ I guess someone else might correct me if im wrong or forgot something Oskar (Oscar) - stuff I use- Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Madweasel Cream of the Crop ![]() 6,224 posts Likes: 61 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Fareham, UK More info | May 05, 2009 15:48 | #3 No, I think you have it about right kokakaste2. All other effects can be done equally well in post-processing. The ones you list are the only ones you might need these days. I find the Cokin filters acceptable - I know their 'neutral' filters are not as neutral as more expensive options like Lee filters, but they're near enough and if the colour balance is off enough to notice, you can easily correct it in post-processing. Mark.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DaveG Goldmember 2,040 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2003 Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia More info | May 06, 2009 06:17 | #4 Polarizing, ND, and of course UV filters are all that I own. Split ND work can be done better - in my opinion - in Photoshop. "There's never time to do it right. But there's always time to do it over."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kuma Senior Member ![]() 996 posts Joined May 2007 Location: The Igloo spirit remains More info | HVstar is a good place to get your filters from.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JackLiu Senior Member 570 posts Joined Apr 2009 Location: Ventura County, Calif., USA More info | May 06, 2009 11:10 | #6 As a start the best filters to get is a (1) circular polarizing filter and (2) UV filter (for lens protection). Afterward you may want to get additional filters based on your photographic needs. Try this site - http://maxsaver.net/ "Love life and life will love you back. Love people and they will love you back." Arthur Rubinstein.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Madweasel Cream of the Crop ![]() 6,224 posts Likes: 61 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Fareham, UK More info | May 06, 2009 12:15 | #7 DaveG wrote in post #7866944 ![]() ...Split ND work can be done better - in my opinion - in Photoshop. This can only be true if the highlights are not blown. When the sky is especially bright, only an ND grad in front of the lens will do the job. Once a part of the image is truly blown, nothing can bring it back. Unless you mean by combining different exposures in Photoshop. That would enable you to overcome ANY difference in brightness, much as with HDR. Mark.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DutchOven Senior Member ![]() 349 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | May 06, 2009 13:00 | #8 what's ND? and what does a polarizing filter do? -Kevin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DaveG Goldmember 2,040 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2003 Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia More info | May 06, 2009 13:22 | #9 Madweasel wrote in post #7868857 ![]() This can only be true if the highlights are not blown. When the sky is especially bright, only an ND grad in front of the lens will do the job. Once a part of the image is truly blown, nothing can bring it back. Unless you mean by combining different exposures in Photoshop. That would enable you to overcome ANY difference in brightness, much as with HDR. I find that if I shoot RAW I can decode for the highlights and then open the file in Photoshop. Then I decode the same RAW file for the shadows and open it up in PS as a new layer. Short of a VERY blown out sky then a combination of the two "original" shots, using Layers with Layer Masks, will produce very nice results. "There's never time to do it right. But there's always time to do it over."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Madweasel Cream of the Crop ![]() 6,224 posts Likes: 61 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Fareham, UK More info | May 06, 2009 13:29 | #10 ND is neutral density, which refers to a dimming of the light transmitted without giving a colour. This can therefore allow use of a longer exposure than would otherwise be possible. An ND grad on the other hand means a graduated filter which is clear in one part and which graduates to a darker, but still neutral, effect at the other end. This is typically used in landscape photography to control bright skies so as not to lose detail in them, but at the same time not darken the foreground. Mark.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 3198 guests, 127 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |