Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 08 Jun 2009 (Monday) 23:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Polaris Star Trails

 
boost_dependent
Senior Member
Avatar
300 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Pensacola, FL
     
Jun 08, 2009 23:51 |  #1

Canon 40D
Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 @ 11mm f/4
ISO 200

164 30sec exposures (82 min) & 1 dark frame
combined with startrails.de

Color

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3657/3609212367_3da0cde358_b.jpg



B/W
IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3373/3610025274_4fba5cc91c_b.jpg

+Canon 7D+|+[COLOR=Navy]Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 AT-X DX Pro+|+Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM+|+Canon 100mm f/2.8 macro[COLOR=DarkGreen]​+|+Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM[COLOR=DarkGreen]+|+Canon 430EX Flash[COLOR=DarkGreen]​+|+Slik Tripod
https://www.facebook.c​om/NostalgicImaging (external link)
http://www.youtube.com​/user/boostdependent/v​ideos (external link)
http://www.nostalgicim​aging.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Catanonia
Senior Member
968 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: UK
     
Jun 09, 2009 03:44 |  #2

Can definately say you got your polarscope aligned :)


MY NEW WEBSITE : www.portrait-universe.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jgrussell
Looking around nervously
Avatar
18,758 posts
Likes: 14
Joined May 2008
Location: NJ USA
     
Jun 09, 2009 08:29 |  #3

Very nicely done!


-- jgr
blog (external link) | gear | my birds (external link)http://photos.jgrussel​l.com/gallery/7381653_​pK9fK (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vseth24
Hatchling
6 posts
Joined Sep 2008
     
Jun 09, 2009 23:17 |  #4

just interested in why you would need a dark frame?...i want to get into star trails too




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
boost_dependent
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
300 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Pensacola, FL
     
Jun 10, 2009 08:27 as a reply to  @ vseth24's post |  #5

The dark frame helps cut down on the noise.

I also have a question.
I get people asking me why I just don't do one long exposure vs. doing the multiple short exposures. Can someone give me the pros and cons of of both ways please?

Thanks for the comments!


+Canon 7D+|+[COLOR=Navy]Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 AT-X DX Pro+|+Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM+|+Canon 100mm f/2.8 macro[COLOR=DarkGreen]​+|+Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM[COLOR=DarkGreen]+|+Canon 430EX Flash[COLOR=DarkGreen]​+|+Slik Tripod
https://www.facebook.c​om/NostalgicImaging (external link)
http://www.youtube.com​/user/boostdependent/v​ideos (external link)
http://www.nostalgicim​aging.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nipper
Member
Avatar
50 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: ENGLAND where they tax you for breathing
     
Jun 10, 2009 15:37 as a reply to  @ boost_dependent's post |  #6

The one thing that does come to mind with long exposures is you tend to get hot pixels show up in the dark sky, because ( I think) the sensor gets pretty warm.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Jun 10, 2009 23:47 |  #7

boost_dependent wrote in post #8083151 (external link)
I get people asking me why I just don't do one long exposure vs. doing the multiple short exposures. Can someone give me the pros and cons of of both ways please?

Two reasons:


  1. Noise is integrated as an essentially linear function of exposure time and you reach a point that the really dark areas will become pure noise.
  2. With extremely long exposures, any foreground objects (like trees) will eventually wind up being greatly overexposed.

nipper wrote in post #8085733 (external link)
The one thing that does come to mind with long exposures is you tend to get hot pixels show up in the dark sky, because ( I think) the sensor gets pretty warm.

That's one of those urban legends that is based on a misunderstanding of of the term hot pixel -- the term "hot" refers to the effective analog gain and not the temperature. Each photosite on a CMOS image sensor has its own isolation amplifier that converts stored charge into a voltage. It is impossible to manufacture a sensor in which each of the ten to twenty million amplifiers have precisely the same gain -- add to this, the variation in light sensitivity between photosites and also finite differences between each of the micro lenses over each photosite. The end result is that the longer the exposure, the more apparent the differences in gain between individual photosites.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ Johnston
Cream of the Crop
9,334 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2008
     
Jun 10, 2009 23:50 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

Wow, you guys have stars down there? ;) Its bloody twilight all the time past 11 oclock up here! I'm jealous you actually get to see stars, nevermind make trails!


Adventurous Photographer, Writer (external link) & Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nipper
Member
Avatar
50 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: ENGLAND where they tax you for breathing
     
Jun 11, 2009 12:23 as a reply to  @ Bill Boehme's post |  #9

That's one of those urban legends that is based on a misunderstanding of of the term hot pixel -- the term "hot" refers to the effective analog gain and not the temperature. Each photosite on a CMOS image sensor has its own isolation amplifier that converts stored charge into a voltage. It is impossible to manufacture a sensor in which each of the ten to twenty million amplifiers have precisely the same gain -- add to this, the variation in light sensitivity between photosites and also finite differences between each of the micro lenses over each photosite. The end result is that the longer the exposure, the more apparent the differences in gain between individual photosites.[/QUOTE]

Now in English please.:p




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dcad10
Member
Avatar
211 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: California, USA
     
Jun 11, 2009 14:01 |  #10

nipper wrote in post #8090891 (external link)
Now in English please.:p

If you take too long of an exposure with a digital sensor, then it will turn out poorly;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Jun 11, 2009 15:26 |  #11

nipper wrote in post #8090891 (external link)
Now in English please.:p

dcad10 wrote in post #8091483 (external link)
If you take too long of an exposure with a digital sensor, then it will turn out poorly;)

Excellent job of translation! ;)

My wife keeps telling me that when she asks what time it is, she does not want to know how to build an atomic clock. :p


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
boost_dependent
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
300 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Pensacola, FL
     
Jun 11, 2009 15:43 as a reply to  @ Bill Boehme's post |  #12

Thanks for the answer(s)... that helped out.
Some other people I know were saying their Nikon D700 would be able to do a single long exposure just fine, unlike my 40D. Something about the full frame and in camera noise reduction and the high ISO performance that it has.

Yes, down here in Pensacola, FL we do have stars LoL although the light pollution sucks! Polaris is about 30deg for us.


+Canon 7D+|+[COLOR=Navy]Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 AT-X DX Pro+|+Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM+|+Canon 100mm f/2.8 macro[COLOR=DarkGreen]​+|+Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM[COLOR=DarkGreen]+|+Canon 430EX Flash[COLOR=DarkGreen]​+|+Slik Tripod
https://www.facebook.c​om/NostalgicImaging (external link)
http://www.youtube.com​/user/boostdependent/v​ideos (external link)
http://www.nostalgicim​aging.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Jun 11, 2009 17:57 as a reply to  @ boost_dependent's post |  #13

Invite them to show you. Set up cameras side by side and the rule is that they must do a single 82 minute exposure while you do 164 half-minute exposures. Of course, the loser must buy the winner a nice expensive dinner.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,641 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 406
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Jun 12, 2009 09:41 |  #14

Very nice !




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ajayclicks
Senior Member
Avatar
902 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 106
Joined May 2006
Location: Bangalore, India
     
Jun 16, 2009 02:36 |  #15

Nice shot. One question- do you take the dark frame prior to taking the multiple shots, or after your done with it?


https://www.instagram.​com/ajaygargphotograph​y/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/ajaygargphotography (external link)http://flickr.com/phot​os/ajayclicks (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,089 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Polaris Star Trails
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is arohastories
1232 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.