cicopo Goldmember  More info | Jul 03, 2009 18:02 | #1756 David, she's very attractive and deserves to be captured with your camera.  In this one you can just notice that some of the upper wing's covering has peeled off. Luckily it didn't cause a loss of control.   A skill is developed through constant practice with a passion to improve, not bought.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ALaS Goldmember  2,205 posts Likes: 7 Joined Aug 2007 More info | Jul 04, 2009 01:58 | #1757 David S wrote in post #8219422  Couple of more at ISO 1600 and f/2.8 and the use of outer points. No need to focus and recompose like my 30D.   Why is it the only noisy part of this image is the girl? Best Regards,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
voka_gsw Member 58 posts Joined Aug 2006 More info | Jul 04, 2009 02:20 | #1758 Selective noise reduction, I assume.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidS Senior Member  559 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2006 Location: La Jolla, CA More info | Jul 04, 2009 02:37 | #1759 The pics were a little underexposed so I had to correct that in PP and in addition to running curves in PP probably brought out more noise. Leica M | Sony a7R | Fujfilm X-Pro 1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
1Twist Senior Member  843 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: With 6,970,583,806 others give or take More info | Jul 04, 2009 02:43 | #1760 Thank you for reading
LOG IN TO REPLY |
zincozinco -Followers of Fidget-  4,420 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Andalucía More info | Jul 04, 2009 06:20 | #1761 ALaS wrote in post #8221339 Why is it the only noisy part of this image is the girl? I found as well if you pixel peep the files even from a studio shoot, if there is a bit of under exposure you will get this kind of noise. The exposure have to be dead on - then you wont get the noise. As her face is a bit shaded that will happen as you can see that the highlights are blown in the BG Living the life, overexposing...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheGhostofFM Goldmember  3,982 posts Likes: 8 Joined Apr 2006 Location: Toronto More info | Jul 04, 2009 08:32 | #1762 1Twist wrote in post #8221416 Well if I am in the correct place, I have found a bunch of people who have too much money to buy S#$t like EOS-1 Ds Mrk 11 dslr. Which turns out good because I just got one myself 6-9 months ago. I don't claim to be a newbie in the same sentence I would not claim to be a pro. Yet my images are sub par and on a very inconstant basis. And yes I am going to blame my new equp. before my self. I tried to use most functions on this camera and then go back to the ones I am comfortable with. Reset back to factory and the cycle continues.I can't believe some of the images I am getting! This rig it capable of much more than I am getting out of it. And I know ..... I am the one shooting right. If anybody would like to help out send me a message. I would appreciate any advise. Thank you for reading! 1Twist,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dlintz Senior Member  614 posts Likes: 4 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Midwest More info | Jul 04, 2009 10:05 | #1763 M3Rocket wrote in post #8185419 Your fourth? Something happen to the other three? Maybe the Hoff "graduated" to a 1Ds3?  I bought his second or third, less than 7000 clicks and it works great....couldn't be happier. Doug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
1Twist Senior Member 843 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: With 6,970,583,806 others give or take More info | Jul 05, 2009 22:39 | #1764 Just trying to make a joke excuse me. As for the font ... really. Perhaps I could "describe more specifically what issues I am having" but I wont because of persons like you. "This is not a great way of starting out here" -nice touch!!! from a senior member also.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sheawyatt Goldmember  1,406 posts Likes: 28 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Victoria, BC More info | Jul 05, 2009 23:09 | #1765 1Twist wrote in post #8230194 Just trying to make a joke excuse me. As for the font ... really. Perhaps I could "describe more specifically what issues I am having" but I wont because of persons like you. "This is not a great way of starting out here" -nice touch!!! from a senior member also. If you claim that you aren't the problem (which you did in your first post) and you can't (won't) describe the specific problems you are having with the camera, we cannot help you, it's as simple as that. It's like calling the doctor and saying I'm sick, not going in to see him, refusing to tell him anything that is wrong with me, and expecting a diagnosis off of one phone call during which no details were exchanged. It just won't happen. X-T3 | 10-24 f/4 | 18-55 f/2.8-4 | 16 f/1.4 | 80 f/2.8 Macro | 55-200 f/3.5-4.8 | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 | 1.4x TC |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
1Twist Senior Member 843 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: With 6,970,583,806 others give or take More info | Jul 05, 2009 23:36 | #1766 Got it! Done with asking for help, will just keep quite and read, maybe I will learn more.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sheawyatt Goldmember 1,406 posts Likes: 28 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Victoria, BC More info | Jul 06, 2009 00:00 | #1767 No need to keep quiet... we like helping. Answers require a question to be posed first. Even a single sample image with an explanation of what you think is wrong with it is a start. X-T3 | 10-24 f/4 | 18-55 f/2.8-4 | 16 f/1.4 | 80 f/2.8 Macro | 55-200 f/3.5-4.8 | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 | 1.4x TC |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheGhostofFM Goldmember 3,982 posts Likes: 8 Joined Apr 2006 Location: Toronto More info | I'll interrupt this discussion with a picture from tonight's sun set.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sheawyatt Goldmember 1,406 posts Likes: 28 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Victoria, BC More info | Jul 06, 2009 00:24 | #1769 Playing with some sort of HDR are we? Looks pretty good in the shadows... could use some fake sun flare though :P X-T3 | 10-24 f/4 | 18-55 f/2.8-4 | 16 f/1.4 | 80 f/2.8 Macro | 55-200 f/3.5-4.8 | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 | 1.4x TC |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sheawyatt Goldmember 1,406 posts Likes: 28 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Victoria, BC More info | Here we go. I had a week off from school this past week, so I took advantage of it to go do some proper recreation. I didn't do as much photography as I had hoped, but there was enough to keep me somewhat satisfied.
Watching the sunset
Being mobbed by hummingbirds at the feeder -- there were up to 25 at the feeder at a time, which made for some great photo ops.
Excuse me...
Got lucky on this one. I prefocused on an area away from the feeder where they were hovering before going in, and got a couple sharp shots. This is the full frame with 300L + 1.4XTC. I could have used 8.5 fps here, but I only had my 1Ds with me.
Resting in the tree.
X-T3 | 10-24 f/4 | 18-55 f/2.8-4 | 16 f/1.4 | 80 f/2.8 Macro | 55-200 f/3.5-4.8 | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 | 1.4x TC |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is nzfotodog 601 guests, 200 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
