Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
POTN forums are closing 31.12.2023. Please see https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1530921 and other posts in that thread for details.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 19 Jul 2009 (Sunday) 23:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Not satisfied with my Canon 20D

 
MultiDim2009
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Jul 2009
     
Jul 19, 2009 23:53 |  #1

Dear All,

3-Years ago, I traded my Digital Rebel in and bought my Canon 20D. Since then I had never been very satisfied with my 20D's low light performance (even relative to my Rebel). The pictures mostly came out very dark. My friends who have rebel or entry Nikon DSLR's pull in great shots.

I thought it was my lens and went through a series of lens changes and I currently have the Canon 17-85, 2.8 Lens. Even after having a 2.8 lens, if my shots are dark, I am starting to wonder if the 20D is not a good camera.

Now, I am using exposure compensation or high ISO 1600 to get good shots.

Anything else that I am doing wrong or is 20D known for mediocre performance in low light?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
effstop
Senior Member
810 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: San Diego
     
Jul 19, 2009 23:59 |  #2

The 20D is a great camera so post some pictures and EXIF data to determine what is going on.


5D MKI | 1D MKII | 24-70mm 2.8 L | 80-200MM 2.8 L | 400mm 5.6 L |50mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,752 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 207
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Jul 20, 2009 00:02 |  #3

barno wrote in post #8309747 (external link)
The 20D is a great camera so post some pictures and EXIF data to determine what is going on.

+1 Without images it's going to be pretty hard to tell what's really going on.

And when you post the image please ensure theat the exif is intact (don't "save for web" in Photoshop).


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stickman
Goldmember
Avatar
1,966 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Nov 2006
     
Jul 20, 2009 00:03 as a reply to  @ effstop's post |  #4

I've published a lot of work with the 20D, post some pictures so we can see what the problem is.


Stick
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/stickgunner/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikeassk
Goldmember
Avatar
2,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley
     
Jul 20, 2009 00:13 |  #5

Also like to hear more about this Canon 17-85 2.8 Seems like a rare find:rolleyes:


Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
Jul 20, 2009 00:28 |  #6

MultiDim2009 wrote in post #8309715 (external link)
Dear All,

3-Years ago, I traded my Digital Rebel in and bought my Canon 20D. Since then I had never been very satisfied with my 20D's low light performance (even relative to my Rebel). The pictures mostly came out very dark. My friends who have rebel or entry Nikon DSLR's pull in great shots.

I thought it was my lens and went through a series of lens changes and I currently have the Canon 17-85, 2.8 Lens. Even after having a 2.8 lens, if my shots are dark, I am starting to wonder if the 20D is not a good camera.

Now, I am using exposure compensation or high ISO 1600 to get good shots.

Anything else that I am doing wrong or is 20D known for mediocre performance in low light?

Firstly, welcome to the cauldron..

I'm on my second 20D since 2005.. The first was issued to me as a back up for a 1D MkII when I worked for a newspaper.. I found the 20D so good it became my work horse.. My second 20D I bought 2nd hand off a fellow POTNer.. The 20D is one camera Canon got right from the start..The image quality I get out of my 20D never fails to amaze me and can stand up to some of the new offerings from Canon..

It's maybe a good idea you post some examples where your 20D (or you) went wrong.. Have the exif intact.. Maybe you need to re-evaluate your photographic techniques..

Here are examples of low light work using the 20D,,most shot at 3200 iso..

http://www.pbase.com …eue/regurgitato​r&page=all (external link)


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MultiDim2009
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Jul 2009
     
Jul 20, 2009 00:30 |  #7

Friends,
Thanks for the quick responses.
Please see a picture attached with the Exif data.
http://www.screencast.​com/t/WDS9rucwn (external link)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
flareak
Member
Avatar
182 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Jul 20, 2009 00:37 as a reply to  @ MultiDim2009's post |  #8

It's all in the way you meter and what subject your camera is metering. In that photo, the camera is set to meter the background... and you can see the background is perfectly exposed.

The people turn out dark because the background is much brighter than the people inside. If you meter the people instead of the background, you should not have a problem and the people will be properly exposed.


What is L? Oh baby don't hurt me... don't hurt me... no more
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CoryAllenPhotos
Member
Avatar
84 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
     
Jul 20, 2009 00:38 |  #9

It looks like your aperture is kinda high...


Canon 30D x2 ¦ Canon XTi ¦ Canon 70-200mm f/4L ¦ Canon 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II ¦ Canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 ¦ Canon 50mm f/1.8

WTB: Canon 17-40 f/4 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MultiDim2009
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Jul 2009
     
Jul 20, 2009 00:39 |  #10

Mike,
There was a typo in the lens. It is 17-55, 2.8. Not 85. Sorry.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MultiDim2009
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Jul 2009
     
Jul 20, 2009 00:43 |  #11

Flare, not sure what I metered of on this photo, but let me take a few more pictures and share here. This is a perennial problem for me, so it is easy to take a few more and see similar impact.

Cory, I didn't set the aperture. I put in "p" mode and let it chose the aperture and shutter speed.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
flareak
Member
Avatar
182 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Jul 20, 2009 00:45 |  #12

what metering is your camera set to? spot meter, center weighted, average?


What is L? Oh baby don't hurt me... don't hurt me... no more
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikeassk
Goldmember
Avatar
2,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley
     
Jul 20, 2009 00:51 |  #13

Learn to shoot in manual.
Your camera is exposing properly for what you are telling it to expose.
If you shoot in manual (M) you just need to look at the back of the camera (Histogram) to see what your getting and adjusting as you need to.
You can also learn to shoot in AV or P or TV but it does help you learn exposure control nearly as fast IMHO.

If you can nail shots while shooting in M you will advance much faster.


Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MultiDim2009
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Jul 2009
     
Jul 20, 2009 00:53 |  #14

Flare, It is set to evaluative metering.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikeassk
Goldmember
Avatar
2,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley
     
Jul 20, 2009 00:57 |  #15

flareak wrote in post #8309922 (external link)
what metering is your camera set to? spot meter, center weighted, average?

the 20D does not have spot.


Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,973 views & 0 likes for this thread, 25 members have posted to it.
Not satisfied with my Canon 20D
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
3004 guests, 94 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.