If a guy already has a 100mm 2.8 macro is the any sense getting a 50mm 1.8? I know the 100mm takes great portraits and I love to shoot macro so is there any benefit to having a nifty fifty?
Please note all I want is advice.
BBOwen Member ![]() 50 posts Joined Sep 2007 More info | Jul 26, 2009 20:46 | #1 If a guy already has a 100mm 2.8 macro is the any sense getting a 50mm 1.8? I know the 100mm takes great portraits and I love to shoot macro so is there any benefit to having a nifty fifty?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 43 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Jul 26, 2009 20:49 | #2 The only 50mm f2.8 I know of is the Sigma 50mm f2.8 macro. Is that the one you are thinking of? If so, well I don't know what it buys you since you can do 1:1 macro with your 100mm. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sorry, I fixed it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nevermind , I got my answer in another thread.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 43 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Jul 26, 2009 23:18 | #5 I would think the 70-100mm end of your 70-200 @ f2.8 would be great for portraits. I'd probably start there. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xoldboy Senior Member ![]() 577 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Philadelphia More info | Jul 26, 2009 23:21 | #6 aubiecat wrote in post #8348274 ![]() "If you aren't sure then you don't need it". Hehe, i respectfully disagree, if you aren't sure then rent it first! Crance Studios
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 30, 2009 17:50 | #7 xoldboy wrote in post #8348896 ![]() Hehe, i respectfully disagree, if you aren't sure then rent it first! Ah, this is true.I am having a hard time resisting the urge of buying a 24-70 f/2.8L. The pretty much covers the lower end of the spectrum.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nureality Goldmember 3,611 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2008 More info | Jul 30, 2009 17:59 | #8 you want to plunk down $1300 for a 24-70L but are having a tough time with $100 for the nifty? Just get it and find out if its for you. Alan "NuReality" Fronshtein
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 31, 2009 22:31 | #9 nureality wrote in post #8371547 ![]() you want to plunk down $1300 for a 24-70L but are having a tough time with $100 for the nifty? Just get it and find out if its for you. What? LMAO
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Undispu7ed "Yeah I'm dirty minded." 470 posts Joined Jul 2008 Location: Austin, TX More info | Jul 31, 2009 22:50 | #10 nureality wrote in post #8371547 ![]() you want to plunk down $1300 for a 24-70L but are having a tough time with $100 for the nifty? Just get it and find out if its for you. Got my 24-70 yesterday from BH. I say it's worth it. Primes are nice but you need a walk around lens and the 24-70 is great for everything in between. - Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is lakemacaircon 735 guests, 232 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |