Oh come on, you aren't really going to be one of those people that think we don;t need more than XXX amount of ram now are you? (is 64 K enough?)
If 8GB is not better than 6Gb then how is 6 better than 4?
How is 4 better than 2.. and so on.
You can read my point, which is 100% accurate.
I gave you that you were 100% accurate as well in that the correct division of 3 would improve RAM speed,..
You can't logically argue that 6GB will be faster when you reach the limit... and need more.
And of course we can reach that limit!
Why on earth are you debating that?
basroil wrote in post #8383506
Just what do you have to run in order to be memory limited with 6gb? I'm sure you could find something random you do, but will an average photographer run out of memory?
Yes. This is absolutely the case.