Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 26 Apr 2009 (Sunday) 14:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Show Us Your RAW Conversions, BEFORE And AFTER

 
dorkiedoode
Senior Member
Avatar
438 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2008
Location: SoCaL
     
Aug 07, 2009 22:45 |  #916

it kinda does



Feedback:
1 2 3 4 5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
imrtun
Member
Avatar
249 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: England, West Sussex
     
Aug 08, 2009 12:27 |  #917

Not to mention the banding around the sun.


Canon 20D - Canon 10-22 3.5/5.6 - Canon Speedlite 580EX - Canon 24-70 /2.8 - Canon 17-55/2.8 - Sigma 70-200 /2.8 - Sekonic L-358 - Bowens Esprit Gemini 500/500 - Bowens Travel Pak - 120cm Octobox
www.fotu.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
THREAD ­ STARTER
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Aug 08, 2009 15:43 |  #918

Heh! I'd say that sun area would be pretty impossible with anything, but the rest of the shot came out nicely. Maybe paste a mushroom cloud in the middle of the sunburst:)?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ziffle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,896 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Big "D" - Texas
     
Aug 09, 2009 00:57 |  #919

tonylong wrote in post #8423498 (external link)
Heh! I'd say that sun area would be pretty impossible with anything, but the rest of the shot came out nicely. Maybe paste a mushroom cloud in the middle of the sunburst:)?

And a UFO coming down to land!!!!! ;)


_______________
Wedding Photog's rule ........... just not sure what???
--
Gear List ~ VIAweddingPhoto(DOT)co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CanonJosh
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Aug 2009
     
Aug 09, 2009 10:00 |  #920

I didn't think such ends could be reached with some of them pictures


:rolleyes:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WhyFi
Goldmember
Avatar
2,774 posts
Gallery: 246 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 845
Joined Apr 2008
Location: I got a castle in Brooklyn, that's where I dwell.
     
Aug 09, 2009 10:54 |  #921

Fun thread - not a fantastic pic, and not night & day, but here's something...

Import -

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2511/3804510330_3c39e29306_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …5@N08/380451033​0/sizes/o/  (external link)

Export -

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3017/3804514296_c48564fb37_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …finyc/380451429​6/sizes/o/  (external link)

Bill is my name - I'm the most wanted man on my island, except I'm not on my island, of course. More's the pity.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,607 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8338
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Aug 09, 2009 11:30 |  #922

So, WhyFi, what did you do? What adjustments did you make? What software did you use? Do you have a pic of your monitor with the software running and this image up so we can see what your screen looked like as you were editing? It'd be nice to be able to see just what you did.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WhyFi
Goldmember
Avatar
2,774 posts
Gallery: 246 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 845
Joined Apr 2008
Location: I got a castle in Brooklyn, that's where I dwell.
     
Aug 09, 2009 12:12 |  #923

Tom Reichner wrote in post #8427040 (external link)
So, WhyFi, what did you do? What adjustments did you make? What software did you use? Do you have a pic of your monitor with the software running and this image up so we can see what your screen looked like as you were editing? It'd be nice to be able to see just what you did.

Whew - I've been looking at my screen, seeing if a screen shot would tell a story - I don't think so, unfortunately, but I can describe what I did and in what order. This was done exclusively in LR2

* Lowered the overall exposure a little bit.

* Bumped the Fill Light to open up some of the shadows that got a little too dark. Not a problem with this photo, but I always keep an eye out for too much of an increase in noise when I lighten.

* Graduated Filter on the sky - this has become a favorite tool of mine. Within the graduated filter sliders, I:
- lowered the exposure on the sky even more
- increased saturation (rather than increase the blue saturation for the entire photo, I like to increase here, in the Graduated Filter, to avoid over-saturation elsewhere. Not really a problem with this photo, but if you had blue objects on the ground, they might get too hot)
- increased clarity (I think of it as a Local Contrast adjustment) to give more pop in the clouds, darkening the shadows on the bottom - just watch out for halos. Again, I like to do 'Clarity' for the sky here, as opposed to bumping it too much on the whole pic - with the amount of clarity I added (63! on the slider), there probably would have been really unnatural light/dark transitions elsewhere in the pic.

* Corrected for chromatic aberration

* Lots of dust spot removal (time to clean the 5D!), including covering the little radio tower on the left

* Added a little more saturation/vibrance on the whole photo, and tweaked the adjustments previously done in the Graduated Filter, if the cumulative effect got to be too much

* LR2 'Landscape Sharpen' preset


Bill is my name - I'm the most wanted man on my island, except I'm not on my island, of course. More's the pity.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Spike44
Goldmember
2,155 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2007
     
Aug 09, 2009 15:47 |  #924

Nice sky recapture WhyFi - sounds like what I would do except I always, always leave final sharpening in Photoshop (Smart Sharpen). I do accept the default values in "Develop" on export...(I assume you last comment was all the sharpening you did)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
THREAD ­ STARTER
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Aug 09, 2009 16:13 |  #925

WhyFi,

Thanks for that shot and your detailed explanation! You definitely have a great show and tell for the tools in LR2 with that gradient demo!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tigerotor77w
Goldmember
1,564 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 52
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Allgäu, BY, Germany
     
Aug 09, 2009 23:49 |  #926

I went out to Seattle and had a few trips to Mt. Rainier National Park -- just after sunrise on Sunday, August 2:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


C&C welcome, as this is the first time I really did much with LR. :/ Still a lot to learn (as you can tell by the limited stuff I did). You can't see it in the screen capture, but I also did a "Camera landscape" on the profile. I dunno why there are all those crops in the history; I went back and looked and most were just garbage crops. I must have been playing around. I will say that this is similar to how my eye saw the scene, but again, any comments are welcome either on what I did or how I shot.

Photo blog (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
weezerfan84
Senior Member
Avatar
903 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Fort Smith, AR
     
Aug 12, 2009 11:49 |  #927

WhyFi wrote in post #8426863 (external link)
Fun thread - not a fantastic pic, and not night & day, but here's something...

Import -

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …5@N08/380451033​0/sizes/o/  (external link)

Export -

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …finyc/380451429​6/sizes/o/  (external link)

I like the finished product, but I would spot heal that cloud. The filter definitlely brought out the cloud imperfection.


Canon 5D classic/Canon 85 1.8/17-40L/Siggy 50 f/1.4 ex/430ex speedlite/and some books

My slowly improving flickr (external link)
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=735845

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
THREAD ­ STARTER
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Aug 12, 2009 12:36 |  #928

Tigeroter,

That is definitely a beautiful scene with Mt. Rainier you captured! I've been negligent in getting up there and taking pics of it myself, nice to see someone in POTN is capturing the beauty!

I'd love it if you could post the After shot full forum size, not in the screen capture. It looks like the foreground could use some lightening, maybe just a touch of fill light or shadow enhancing?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tigerotor77w
Goldmember
1,564 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 52
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Allgäu, BY, Germany
     
Aug 12, 2009 13:15 |  #929

tonylong wrote in post #8446679 (external link)
Tigeroter,

That is definitely a beautiful scene with Mt. Rainier you captured! I've been negligent in getting up there and taking pics of it myself, nice to see someone in POTN is capturing the beauty!

I'd love it if you could post the After shot full forum size, not in the screen capture. It looks like the foreground could use some lightening, maybe just a touch of fill light or shadow enhancing?

Thanks for the encouragement. I tend to have a habit of making this thread go away after my posts here. :p

The "after" picture at 800 pixels wide:

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2554/3801555116_27c2c7e55e_o.jpg


I could probably add a bit of fill light, but as for shadow enhancing... I'll have to look that up. I'll still a noob! :oops:

Photo blog (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zincozinco
-Followers of Fidget-
Avatar
4,420 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Andalucía
     
Aug 12, 2009 13:31 |  #930

that is a great image, love the light on the mountain, if you fill just a tiny bit - it gives great depth to the image with the "dark " bottom!


Living the life, overexposing...
Web (external link), Blog (external link) Name: Mike, Maik, Micke or just zinco.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,407,872 views & 238 likes for this thread, 1059 members have posted to it and it is followed by 176 members.
Show Us Your RAW Conversions, BEFORE And AFTER
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
521 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.