
That's the beauty of "art". It's purely subjective. I, at times, would rather see some noise in some shots.
underexpose by 2/3s of a stop .
ed rader
ed rader "I am not the final word" ![]() More info | Sep 30, 2009 02:54 | #61 jwcdds wrote in post #8728909 ![]() That's the beauty of "art". It's purely subjective. I, at times, would rather see some noise in some shots. underexpose by 2/3s of a stop http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 30, 2009 03:25 | #62 jacobsen1 wrote in post #8728223 ![]() you get a new camera, PotN's down for the entire day, and NO DUCK SHOTS?! ![]() ![]() I know - terrible isn't it. Never mind, here's what you really want. Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Reservoir_Dog Member ![]() 148 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Belgium More info | Have the impression that this 7d dont touch the d700's noise performance, but hey, why the hell did they choose that 7d to have even more pixels then the 50D????
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jm4ever Senior Member ![]() More info | Sep 30, 2009 04:46 | #64 Reservoir_Dog wrote in post #8732785 ![]() Have the impression that this 7d dont touch the d700's noise performance, but hey, why the hell did they choose that 7d to have even more pixels then the 50D???? ![]() ![]() Why compare it to a camera that costs a $1000 more and is FF. Would the D300 not be a bit more of a direct competitor?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tom W Canon Fanosapien ![]() 12,747 posts Likes: 24 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | Sep 30, 2009 04:49 | #65 It does! Thanks! Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
apersson850 Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Sep 30, 2009 05:05 | #66 RiaGurl wrote in post #8729149 ![]() ok so the memory is for 25 lenses. the post sounded like there are only 25 lenses of all the canon lenses that are micro adjustable. that's still not clear i don't think??? You're mixing things up. There are two different, lens related things that can be corrected by the camera. Anders
LOG IN TO REPLY |
carshop Goldmember ![]() 1,845 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: Ontario, Canada More info | Sep 30, 2009 05:35 | #67 Thanks apersson 850 ShawnSmugmug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DarthVader Cream of the Crop ![]() 6,508 posts Likes: 40 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Death Star More info | Sep 30, 2009 06:27 | #68 Super clean..even clean is hard for any crop cameras. I guess you'll stuck with Xsi forever. kompakt wrote in post #8729141 ![]() i played with a 7d today at my local camera shop.. i was disappointed with noise levels above 1600, i never expected this camera to have super super clean iso up to 3200 and beyond but for all the hype about this camera's ability to handle higher iso,i was alittle let down. but besides iso performance..man is the 7d an amazing model! Nikon/Fuji.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stsva Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Sep 30, 2009 08:02 | #69 RiaGurl wrote in post #8732276 ![]() i don't agree about adobe not making later versions compatible. So is it safe to say that, let's say if cs5 comes out in march2010, then a 1ds4 comes out in april, that the 1ds will not work with cs4. if so thats crazy. are photographers with the latest equipment usually the types that would also upgrade photoshop every version, no matter what (and apparently the only way for cameras to work that came out after a release of photoshop?) That's what Adobe hopes, anyway. Some Canon stuff and a little bit of Yongnuo.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stsva Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Sep 30, 2009 08:04 | #70 RiaGurl wrote in post #8729961 ![]() that is if you have cs4, correct? is it correct that you need cs4 to read the 7d raw? will cs3 work? what i don't get and what sucked in the past is that adobe requires you essentially to upgrade to newer version for some cameras. i don't understand why they cannot make newer raw added cameras work within a reasonably recent version of photoshop. i think it's a conspiracy for more money. surely the programmers are smart enough. if other software vendors can handled older version reads, surely adobe could figure it out, but alas, they don't. I'm using CS3 also. I plan to use the Adobe DNG converter and then process the .dng files, or possibly use DPP 3.7 for the initial raw conversion, save as TIFF, then process in ACR and CS3. Some Canon stuff and a little bit of Yongnuo.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 30, 2009 08:14 | #71 stsva wrote in post #8733341 ![]() That's what Adobe hopes, anyway. To give them their due, they did include beta support for the 7D in the latest Lightroom - even though that was released just two weeks after the 7D was announced. I was expecting them to only support it in v3. Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
The_Terminator Member ![]() 178 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Nextdoor to Sarah Connor More info | Sep 30, 2009 08:19 | #72 I'm sure that many people know, but it doesn't hurt to say it again: I only exist for your entertainment.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
District_History_Fan Goldmember 2,286 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2008 More info | Wouldn't it be nice if the industry would adopt DNG as a standard RAW format... It's waaaay overdue.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RiaGurl Goldmember 1,857 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: somewhere south of the arctic circle More info | It would be nice format, if that's how it works, but is DNG better than raw? Not sure I understand the difference, but are you saying I can take raw files, process them through a converter and then open that in camera raw? VictoRia
LOG IN TO REPLY |
puzzle Senior Member ![]() 347 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: London, UK More info | As far as I understand things. DNG is the same as RAW only compatible with more software. I convert ALL of my Raw files to DNG using Adobe Bridge and save them to my hard drive. I then process them as DNG files using Lightroom 2 or photoshop. Before I convert my raw files (CR2) in Bridge I can't see the preview of my shots, once the conversion is complete I see the preview of my shots in bridge and can then Import them into lightroom. Its all relatively simple and quick. Canon5D mkII | 50D | Canon 24-70 f2.8L | Canon EF 85 f1.8 | Canon Speedlite 580ex ii *2 | Elinchrom Skyports | Macbook Pro
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is zaza1 842 guests, 228 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |