I've heard mixed statements about whether it's okay to leave the IS on while using a tripod or not. I did a test to see for myself using the 18-55 IS kit lens.
IS on
IS off
The kit lens seems to be OK to leave the IS on while using a tripod
PaulLi Goldmember  1,144 posts Joined Apr 2009 Location: Long Island More info | Oct 13, 2009 18:27 | #1 I've heard mixed statements about whether it's okay to leave the IS on while using a tripod or not. I did a test to see for myself using the 18-55 IS kit lens. IS off The kit lens seems to be OK to leave the IS on while using a tripod Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
carlXSI Senior Member 315 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Oct 13, 2009 18:38 | #2 A better test would probably be 55-250 IS (or any other telephoto lens with IS) and 100% crop. 6D | 17-40L | 70-200L | 35 2.0 IS | 430ex II | flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikeassk Goldmember  2,329 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2006 Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley More info | Oct 13, 2009 18:41 | #3 the 100-400 IS is the only lens I believe needs to switched off while on a tripod.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NPuter Senior Member  574 posts Likes: 46 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Miami, FL More info | Oct 13, 2009 18:44 | #4 I hate to be a pixel-peeper here, but as far as I can see from those small thumbnails, there seems to be a (slight) difference between the two - I'm favoring the IS off one... whatever though, the difference is completely negligible... NPuter | flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 13, 2009 18:46 | #5 |
ToddLambert I don't like titles  More info | Oct 13, 2009 18:46 | #6 mikeassk wrote in post #8816333  the 100-400 IS is the only lens I believe needs to switched off while on a tripod. Nevermind, did a bit of research which I've listed below:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CYO Member 43 posts Joined Oct 2009 More info | Oct 13, 2009 18:46 | #7 No difference to me at all ...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lisa "At least once a day"  2,325 posts Joined Feb 2009 More info | Oct 13, 2009 18:48 | #8 NPuter wrote in post #8816346 I hate to be a pixel-peeper here, but as far as I can see from those small thumbnails, there seems to be a (slight) difference between the two - I'm favoring the IS off one... whatever though, the difference is completely negligible... Yep. Gear (full list)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ToddLambert I don't like titles More info | Oct 13, 2009 18:54 | #9 Ok, just did a quick Google, here is the list :
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kidslash Member  173 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: NJ More info | Oct 13, 2009 18:55 | #10 Thanks for digging up that list Todd. Very helpful! Canon 5DMII - 1DMIII - Nikon 14-24mm - Canon 17-40L - Canon 50mm f/1.8 - Sigma 50mm f/1.4 - Canon 85mm f/1.8 - 85L - 100L Macro - Canon 24-105L - Canon 70-200mm L IS f/4.0 - Canon 300L f/2.8 - Speedlite 580EX II and 580EX "Every picture tells a story don't it..."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
phreeky Goldmember 3,514 posts Likes: 15 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Australia More info | Oct 13, 2009 18:59 | #11 Turn it off to save battery.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 40 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Oct 13, 2009 19:52 | #12 Your shutter speed is only 1/3 a second. Try it for a 10 second exposure and you will see the difference. It is not going to be a shaky mess like it was handheld, just not as sharp as it could be. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
johnj2803 Senior Member 869 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2009 Location: Miami, FL More info | Oct 13, 2009 20:11 | #13 a better test would be night shots with lights. My personal experience is that the lights in the night shots were a bit blurred with IS ON with a tripod.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop  14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Oct 13, 2009 20:25 | #14 The 70-200 f4 IS definately needs to have the IS off. I did some tests with long exposures 5-10 seconds and many, not all, the IS shots had a "jump" in the image. Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
johnj2803 Senior Member 869 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2009 Location: Miami, FL More info | Oct 13, 2009 20:28 | #15 bohdank wrote in post #8816985 The 70-200 f4 IS definately needs to have the IS off. I did some tests with long exposures 5-10 seconds and many, not all, the IS shots had a "jump" in the image. +1 on this... long exposures will really be messed up with IS on
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is rperkins7 735 guests, 269 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
That coming from the kit lens